Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confusion About Silent Celiac

mhb

Recommended Posts

mhb Apprentice
mhb
Posted

Hi, I am gluten-free for a little over a week. While feeling better overall, my bloating (main symptom) still kicks in, possibly due to other sensitivities I am trying to identify.

Somewhere i got the understanding that some people have silent celiac (no observable villi damage), but I also got the notion that some people react to gluten and are not *any* form of celiac (incl. being without the same medical risks and malabsorption, and not really an immune response). Is this right, or is it true that if you respond well to gluten-free diet you are definitely celiac, whether silent or not?

TIA

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Tim-n-VA Contributor
Tim-n-VA
Posted
Somewhere i got the understanding that some people have silent celiac (no observable villi damage), but I also got the notion that some people react to gluten and are not *any* form of celiac (incl. being without the same medical risks and malabsorption, and not really an immune response).

That is correct. There are non-Celiac reactions to gluten. To add to the confusion Celiac and non-Celiac reactions to gluten can happend at the same time. Specifically people can have Celiac and be allergic to a gluten-conatining grain.

Lux Explorer
Lux
Posted

I am what you have referred to as a 'Silent Coeliac'. This means that, despite receiving positive blood results, I am lacking in visible villi damage, ordinarily required to recieve 'official diagnosis'. In saying that, many on this board will tell you that such tests are unreliable, and it is very common to receive false negatives when having such tests administered. My thinking is that it doesn't really matter either way; so long as you react to gluten, you react to gluten, and you know it cannot be good for you. I will not touch it with a ten foot pole ;-) Anyway, I never really differentiate between the two - nor do I use that term when explaining to anyone what is 'wrong' with me...I am always willing to discuss Coeliac with anyone - and have never experienced anything but support (alongside a little pity, which I can deal with even if I don't want or need it) when I do bring it up...but it just tends to complicate matters when you go into the details of being 'silent' or whatever. As far as I'm concerned, if you get sick, you get sick...sorry for that ramble! *sheepish smile*

Tim-n-VA Contributor
Tim-n-VA
Posted

I had no significant symptoms when I ate gluten. However, routine liver function tests that my doctor ordered showed a lot of fluctuation. That lead to a GI doctor ordering a series of screening tests to eliminate things that could cause the symptoms. Net effect was positive blood test and positive biopsy.

That is what I thought was meant by silent celiac - having the disease and the internal damage - without external symptoms.

In retrospect the occasional nausea that I had was probably an external symptom but nothing like the exteme or even mild symptoms many describe.

darlindeb25 Collaborator
darlindeb25
Posted

There is so much confusion about silent and latent celiac. A silent celiac is someone who does have damage, but no other symptoms. The villi does show damage, yet the patient doesn't know they are sick, a silent celiac is usually diagnosed by accident. A latent celiac is the one who has no visible damage yet. Here is an article I found from medicinenet for you to review.

http://www.medicinenet.com/celiac_disease/page5.htm

What is latent and silent celiac disease?

The terms latent and silent celiac disease are used to refer to patients who have inherited the genes that predispose them to celiac disease but have not yet developed the symptoms or signs of celiac disease.

Latent celiac disease refers specifically to patients who have abnormal antibody blood tests for celiac disease (see discussion of specific tests for celiac disease) but who have normal small intestines and no signs or symptoms of celiac disease. For example:

Some patients may have had a childhood onset of celiac disease and the disease may have been successfully treated with a gluten-free diet. The patients' intestines may have resumed a normal appearance and function, and they may have no signs or symptoms of celiac disease.

Some patients with celiac disease in childhood abandon the gluten free diet as adults, yet they remain free of the signs or symptoms of celiac disease.

In both of the above instances, the celiac disease is latent, and the patients can develop signs and symptoms of celiac disease later in life.

Silent celiac disease refers to patients who have abnormal antibody blood tests for celiac disease as well as loss of villi in the small intestine but have no symptoms or signs of celiac disease, even on a normal diet that contains gluten. Like patients with latent celiac disease, these patients can develop signs or symptoms of celiac disease later in life.

Lux Explorer
Lux
Posted

Ah, in which case Iwould appear to be a Latent Coeliac...I see. Doctors. I have definitely had symptoms, so that rules Silent out! (Always thought it funny that something so horrendously...not silent would have such a label attached to it!) ;-)

  • 10 years later...
Blvr Rookie
Blvr
Posted

I have silent Celiac disease.  My small intestine biopsy was positive as well as all my blood tests.  I had no symptoms except anemia which has been treated with iron supplements and now is normal.  I would like to hear from others who have no pain. This makes it very difficult to be gluten free.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,263
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Carol mintuck
    Newest Member
    Carol mintuck
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      is Kirkland Imported French Brie gluten free?

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      Agree with everything your wrote. Just to clarify my earlier comment, I was specifically focusing on cross-contamination risk, as opposed to identified, obfuscated, or occult ingredients. I've noticed that Costco does like many other manufacturers and errs on the side of caution by putting the major allergen exposure label on products that are actually safe. My first bump into this was buying their Kirkland quinoa online, where the website says it is gluten free but the package says it was/might have been/ made in a facility that processes wheat. They were able to tell me that the package I bought was certainly safe, but they explicitly stated that that could change at any time (so don't count on their answer today being relevant for next month's purchase).
    • trents
      Elimination diet think I may be Gluten tolerant next steps to get tested? Questions

      By trents · Posted

      The reality is, returning to gluten consumption makes some people so ill that they cannot complete the gluten challenge. There is no shame in that. Nonetheless, they must live with the ambiguity of not knowing whether they have celiac disease or NCGS. Another reality is that at the end of the day, both conditions require complete abstinence from gluten and other "cross reactive" foods. One thing you can do is to get genetically tested to see if you have one or both of  the genes that have been linked to the development of celiac disease. This doesn't require a gluten challenge. However, the gene test cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population have one or both of the genes but only 1% of the general population ever develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. If you don't have either gene but you are certain that gluten causes distress then you know you have NCGS. And, to answer your previous question about the gluten challenge causing further damage to the SB villous lining, the answer is "yes" if you have celiac disease. However, a few more weeks of damage on top of months/years of existing damage is not likely to do irreparable harm. 
    • trents
      UK Member Looking For Help - Recent Test

      By trents · Posted

      There are some other things that can cause elevated blood antibody numbers on the celiac tests. Some other diseases, some medications (olmesartan, NSAIDs) and even some other intolerances to non-gluten foods, especially dairy. But the odds are, the elevated numbers are caused by celiac disease.
    • xxnonamexx
      Elimination diet think I may be Gluten tolerant next steps to get tested? Questions

      By xxnonamexx · Posted

      I just don't want to eat too much gluten and get sick for 6 weeks before the test. I would rather eat just enough for the test and not over gluten. I guess 2 slices of whole wheat which I was having and my regular oatmeal may work which was my previous routine and pasta but that's about of gluten daily lol I will have to see not sure about buying our gluten. Is it true after eating gluten it can stay in your body for a long time? If I eliminated gluten for 3 weeks does it mean it's really still in me and I can still have issues? Thanks
    • LeeRoy83
      UK Member Looking For Help - Recent Test

      By LeeRoy83 · Posted

      Thanks for the info guys. I’ll follow up with my GP next week. So as it stands it’s looking like Celiac is likely? It’s come as a bit of a shock really, I know my symptoms have persisted a bit more over the past month or so compared to previous flares. I did have a bout of norovirus about 8 weeks ago and stomach never quite returned to it’s best since.
×
×
  • Create New...