Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Research


katebuggie28

Recommended Posts

katebuggie28 Apprentice

Just wanted to know if anyone on here has researched antinutrients, lectins and glycoalkaloids? If so what if anything did you dechiper from the information. Did any of the information cause you to change your eating habits ever further?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

I believe Ursa Major will be able to address your question quite well. Although I have done some poking around on the subjects in question, I concluded that most of what I cannot eat I already know about. I do know nightshades are toxic to everyone though, and that it is only a matter of how much a person notices the effects. Some of us are simply more sensitive to them. Since lectins are in so many veggies to varying degrees, I figure they can't be all that harmful to everyone. But we're all different, so it's good to be able to listen close to what your body is telling you.

On anti-nutrients, I think many if not all nutrients are balanced by others. For instance, potassium tends to balance sodium. Calcium and iron should be ingested at different times in order to be effectively absorbed. Magnesium can inhibit calcium absorption too. There are untold numbers of these types of interactions, but I believe it just underscores the importance of a well balanced and widely varied diet. That's not to say there aren't compounds in foods which are mostly detrimental, but the specific levels of those compounds aren't usually very high. In those cases where they are highly toxic, we generally don't regard them as edible.

I'd like to think our natural food sources are the way they are for good reasons, even if we don't fully understand why. But how our individual makeup plays a part in the scheme is something which, sadly, each of us needs to figure out. That saying "nobody's perfect" comes to mind.

That's my two cents.

Ursa Major Collaborator

There are a number of foods very high in lectins. Those include all grains (which includes rice and corn), eggs, all dairy, legumes (including soy) and nightshade foods (potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, eggplant and tobacco).

Nightshade foods are also high in oxalates, which will cause or aggravate arthritis in many people.

I was investigated for arthritis several times, because of the crippling pain in my joints. But x-rays never showed anything. Now it is obvious that the joint pain was caused by lectin foods (besides other symptoms, including gastrointestinal distress, brain fog and others).

Here is a link to a great website about lectins, where these things are explained much better than I can explain them:

Open Original Shared Link

RiceGuy Collaborator

I hadn't really looked into the whole lectin thing in-depth, but I find it interesting how lectins and gluten are so intertwined. Aside from the very informative link Ursa Major posted, here's one I just found: Open Original Shared Link

The only word I have right now is: Amazing!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.