Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test And No Endoscopy?


hilwacat

Recommended Posts

hilwacat Rookie

My doctor diagnosed me with Celiac based on positive Endomysial AB and Transglutaminase IGA tests. She told me that the results were virtually 100% accurate and that I do not need further testing, but when I look online it seems like a lot of websites advise endoscopy for diagnosis.

Did anyone else only have blood work and not an endoscopy? I guess I am hoping that it is all a big mistake...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator

With both of those tests being positive there is really no reason to go through with a biopsy. The positive EMA and tTG is enough for an official diagnosis.

The biopsy can be false negative because damage can be "patchy".....if samples are taken from an unaffected area you can have a false negative. A negative biopsy does not rule out Celiac Disease.

Since you've got the positive bloodwork a biopsy is not necessary.

S-J-L Apprentice

I had both positive blood work and biopsies. I have heard the biopsies can be negative because its a patchy disease also. The main reason they do the biopsies is that not too many people want to go gluten free unless they absolutely have to. It changes your whole life style.

disneyfan Apprentice
My doctor diagnosed me with Celiac based on positive Endomysial AB and Transglutaminase IGA tests. She told me that the results were virtually 100% accurate and that I do not need further testing, but when I look online it seems like a lot of websites advise endoscopy for diagnosis.

Did anyone else only have blood work and not an endoscopy? I guess I am hoping that it is all a big mistake...

I'm so glad you said this because I feel much better now! My endo did the TTG test first since he said that was the screening test. That was positive so he ordered the EMA which came back positive also. I did make an appointment with a Gastro Dr and was disgusted. He did not believe that I had any gluten problems and said I had convinced myself that those foods were bad for me.

I decided that I felt horrible enough to go gluten free without his diagnosis and it was the best decision I made. My blood work now shows I am absorbing my calcium, Vit D, anemia is gone, and my thyroid meds have been lowered as well.

I felt much better within a week of going gluten free. I probably should have pursued an endoscope to be sure but so many reports say if they don't get the right spot in the biopsy, you will get a negative biopsy. I chose not to do this and follow the diet.

It's been a little over a year and you couldn't pay me to eat a piece of bread or cracker!

Leslie-FL Rookie
I'm so glad you said this because I feel much better now! My endo did the TTG test first since he said that was the screening test. That was positive so he ordered the EMA which came back positive also. I did make an appointment with a Gastro Dr and was disgusted. He did not believe that I had any gluten problems and said I had convinced myself that those foods were bad for me.

What a horrible doctor!! Especially with the positive bloodwork having brought you there. It's good that you went forward and tried eating gluten free for your own peace of mind. You're feeling better already and showing documented improvement in your health. Good for you, for doing what is right for you!

Can these blood tests be done with an accurate result after a person is gluten free for a year? I'd like to check into it with my doctor, just because an official diagnosis might be a good thing if, for instance, I were ever hospitalized and needed it noted in my records for the meals to be gluten free, but I don't want a diagnosis badly enough to start eating gluten again.

bakinghomesteader Contributor

I had positive blood work and with the positive diet response and the positive ttg from enterolab, my doctor gave me the diagnosis without endo. I said, with positive blood work, I really don't want to have to go through an endo. We agreed that the end results would be a gluten free diet anyway. So no endo.

hilwacat Rookie

That makes sense, but I wonder if positive blood tests can mean only gluten sensitivity, not Celiac disease. One is so much more serious than the other.

Does anyone know if these positive blood tests can mean just gluten sensitivity w/o Celiac disease?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

If you have a positive TTg and EmA, you are making antibodies against your own tissue. That to me spells celiac.

If you want to know whether or not there is damage to your intestine, you should do the endoscopy. No one can stop you from going gluten free after that whether or not it's positive, but then you'd know. I'm not necessarily saying that everybody always should have biopsies done. Just a point to consider I think.

Leslie-FL, no, blood work after a year gluten free would not be reliable at all. Some people do still show antibodies after a year but the chance is not very high I think.

Pauliina

Rachel--24 Collaborator
That makes sense, but I wonder if positive blood tests can mean only gluten sensitivity, not Celiac disease.

No, the positive antibodies indicate an autoimmune condition....not a sensitivity.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,877
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sasha bul
    Newest Member
    Sasha bul
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      @Mynx, how long have you been gluten-free? I ask because many newly diagnosed celiacs react to many things, and often think their reactions are caused by gluten, when in fact, they are really caused by a combination of a sensitive gut due to damage, as well as additional food intolerance/leaky gut issues to other foods which may be temporary until their villi heal.
    • Scott Adams
      Many major brands of distilled vinegar in the USA, including Heinz white vinegar, are typically made from corn. In the United States, corn is a common and cost-effective raw material used in the production of distilled white vinegar. The process involves fermenting the sugars derived from corn into alcohol, which is then further fermented into acetic acid to produce vinegar. Distillation follows, which purifies the liquid and removes impurities, including any residual proteins or allergens. While the source of the vinegar (e.g., corn) is not always explicitly stated on the label, corn-derived vinegar is widely used in the food industry due to its neutral flavor and affordability. For individuals with gluten intolerance or celiac disease, distilled vinegar made from corn is generally considered safe, as the distillation process effectively removes gluten proteins. However, if you have concerns about cross-contamination or specific sensitivities, it’s always a good idea to contact the manufacturer directly to confirm the sourcing and production practices. Heinz, for example, has stated that their distilled white vinegar is gluten-free and safe for those with celiac disease, but verifying this information can provide additional peace of mind. The belief that distilled vinegar is gluten-free is rooted in the scientific understanding that gluten proteins, which are large and complex molecules, are generally too big to pass through the distillation process. Distillation involves heating a liquid to create vapor, which is then condensed back into a liquid form, leaving behind larger molecules like gluten proteins. However, the concern about cross-contamination arises from the possibility that gluten-containing ingredients may have been present in the liquid prior to distillation. While the distillation process itself is highly effective at removing gluten, the equipment used in production could potentially introduce trace amounts of gluten if not thoroughly cleaned between batches. For most individuals with gluten sensitivity or celiac disease, distilled vinegar is considered safe because the gluten content, if any, is typically below the threshold that would trigger a reaction. However, for those with extreme gluten intolerance or celiac disease, even trace amounts can cause adverse effects. This is why some individuals, like yourself, may choose to avoid commercially produced distilled vinegar and opt for alternatives like apple cider vinegar, which can be verified as gluten-free. The meticulous process of researching ingredients and preparing homemade products, such as ketchup, is indeed challenging but crucial for maintaining health and avoiding gluten exposure. It’s important to note that regulatory standards for gluten-free labeling vary by region, and in many places, products labeled "gluten-free" must contain less than 20 parts per million (ppm) of gluten, which is considered safe for the vast majority of people with celiac disease. Nonetheless, individual sensitivity levels can vary, and your approach highlights the importance of personalized dietary management for those with severe gluten intolerance.
    • Bebee
      I have been diagnosed with Microscopic Colitis (LC) for quite a few years, so I have been gluten-free and DF.  I would like to get tested for Celiac Disease because of the possibility of cross contamination and colon cancer.  And if you were hospitalized and didn't have a celiac diagnosis you could not get gluten-free food, I don't know if that is true or not.  Also because there is chance of colon cancer so I want to know if I have Celiac Disease and need to be on very restrictive diet.  The only testing I did was a sigmoid scope and Enter Lab but no gene testing.  I know I can go back to eating gluten for a few months, but I would worry you would have to stay home for the few months while getting gluten.  What other options do I have?  Should I do the gene testing?  Maybe through Entero Lab?  Any other tests?  How important is it to have Celiac diagnosed? Thank you! Barb
    • trents
      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
×
×
  • Create New...