Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Follow Up With Gi Doc


ohsotired

Recommended Posts

ohsotired Enthusiast

I had a follow up with my GI doc today............

We talked about test results, and he says everthing is normal. I asked about the high levels of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit and MCV from my first round of blood tests, and he said that all that means is that my red blood cells are larger than normal, but that it's probably not anything to worry about.

He talked about my stool tests, and those are normal. (I have a copy, and that's what it says.)

He talked about my colonoscopy, and how he didn't see anything out of the ordinary, except for the internal hemmhroids, and that the biopsies showed no evidence of anything. (I don't seem to have a copy of the biopsy report, even though I requested it.)

He asks me if I'm still having 'issues' or if I'm feeling better.

Uhm, doc? I told ya this has been going on for over 8 years, and I don't think it's going to magically go away, and why else would I be sitting here in your office?

I really wish I'd actually said this to him, instead of just mumbling "yeah, everything's the same."

So I ask about the celiac test and told him that everything I've read says there are a total of five tests that should be run. He tells me that the Ttg IgA is the most sensitive and that the results can be trusted.

I proceed to tell him about how I've done some additional family research, and how my cousin has similar issues (as do many other family members) and that his doctor recently put him on a gluten free diet.

He says "Well we can run the additional tests but if they come back negative, then that will be in your chart." :blink::unsure: WHAT? I push a little more and he agrees to run the rest of the tests, and he even mentioned something about gene testing, but that he'd need to do some research to find out what was involved with that, because he's never dealt with that before. Again..... :blink:

(We're also running blood work for B12 deficiency.)

So he basically says that we wait for this blood work, and if it's negative we 'monitor and wait' and treat as though it's IBS, which I'm sure means a pill or twelve.

So then the MA comes in to do the blood draw, and she says "I'm not sure how much blood we need - we've NEVER done this set of tests before. So I guess I'll just take two vials......" :blink:<_<

So, this tells me something. He's willing to listen, and appease me to a certain extent, but that he has never treated or diagnosed a Celiac patient.

So what do I do now? Wait for the blood work, get copies of the results, and then find a new doc, I guess. He's not mentioned an endoscopy, and even if my blood work comes back positive, I doubt I'll let him do one. I don't know whether to try a naturopath next, or to try another visit back to my PCP, or to find another GI. I guess I just sit and wait to see what the blood work says.

I feel like I'm back pedaling here. <_<


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



leadmeastray88 Contributor

I hear 'ya! I had the same thing happen to me today.

In June I had the "Celiac Panel" done, not knowing what that was or what tests they were, I didn't know then what I know now (Thanks to this place). When I went back all they said was 'its negative'

So I went today to fill a prescription, and while i was there I asked for a copy of my 'Celiac Panel' results to see what they tested.

Same as you, he only tested the ttG. He actually laughed at me when I asked for a copy.

I am very angry now, because now i don't know where I stand, and its too late because I"ve already started eating a gluten free diet and I can't go back now. If I had known they didn't test everything I would never have went gluten free before getting the testing.

People - learn from our mistakes! Go in armed with information and a LIST of the tests!:

Total IgA Serum

ttG - IgA

EMA - IgA

AGA - IgA

AGA - IgG

The doctors work for you - get what you want out of them or find someone who will listen.

lizard00 Enthusiast

Find a new doc!!! Did your PCP recommend this one? If not, and you like your PCP, ask them for a referral. Or do you know any nurses? They're always great to tell you who to see or not see.

I had a similar experience with the PA at my GP's office. CLUELESS!!!

I really love my GP, just not her PA. So, now, I insist that I see the GP instead. The GP sent me to the GI I currently have and I couldn't be happier with him.

ohsotired Enthusiast

leadmeastray - Precisely the reason I haven't just started the gluten-free diet yet, in case they screwed up and didn't do all the tests. I'm sorry you went through this too - I hope the diet is working for you.

lizard00 - Uhm........sort of (PCP recommending the GI)..........my PCP was on vacation, so I saw another doc in the office, and THAT doc referred me to this GI. Although, I may be looking for a new PCP too, as the last time I saw her she sort of 'pooh poohed' my claim of fatigue and told me to get more sleep. <_<

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.