Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Follow Up With Gi Doc


ohsotired

Recommended Posts

ohsotired Enthusiast

I had a follow up with my GI doc today............

We talked about test results, and he says everthing is normal. I asked about the high levels of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit and MCV from my first round of blood tests, and he said that all that means is that my red blood cells are larger than normal, but that it's probably not anything to worry about.

He talked about my stool tests, and those are normal. (I have a copy, and that's what it says.)

He talked about my colonoscopy, and how he didn't see anything out of the ordinary, except for the internal hemmhroids, and that the biopsies showed no evidence of anything. (I don't seem to have a copy of the biopsy report, even though I requested it.)

He asks me if I'm still having 'issues' or if I'm feeling better.

Uhm, doc? I told ya this has been going on for over 8 years, and I don't think it's going to magically go away, and why else would I be sitting here in your office?

I really wish I'd actually said this to him, instead of just mumbling "yeah, everything's the same."

So I ask about the celiac test and told him that everything I've read says there are a total of five tests that should be run. He tells me that the Ttg IgA is the most sensitive and that the results can be trusted.

I proceed to tell him about how I've done some additional family research, and how my cousin has similar issues (as do many other family members) and that his doctor recently put him on a gluten free diet.

He says "Well we can run the additional tests but if they come back negative, then that will be in your chart." :blink::unsure: WHAT? I push a little more and he agrees to run the rest of the tests, and he even mentioned something about gene testing, but that he'd need to do some research to find out what was involved with that, because he's never dealt with that before. Again..... :blink:

(We're also running blood work for B12 deficiency.)

So he basically says that we wait for this blood work, and if it's negative we 'monitor and wait' and treat as though it's IBS, which I'm sure means a pill or twelve.

So then the MA comes in to do the blood draw, and she says "I'm not sure how much blood we need - we've NEVER done this set of tests before. So I guess I'll just take two vials......" :blink:<_<

So, this tells me something. He's willing to listen, and appease me to a certain extent, but that he has never treated or diagnosed a Celiac patient.

So what do I do now? Wait for the blood work, get copies of the results, and then find a new doc, I guess. He's not mentioned an endoscopy, and even if my blood work comes back positive, I doubt I'll let him do one. I don't know whether to try a naturopath next, or to try another visit back to my PCP, or to find another GI. I guess I just sit and wait to see what the blood work says.

I feel like I'm back pedaling here. <_<


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



leadmeastray88 Contributor

I hear 'ya! I had the same thing happen to me today.

In June I had the "Celiac Panel" done, not knowing what that was or what tests they were, I didn't know then what I know now (Thanks to this place). When I went back all they said was 'its negative'

So I went today to fill a prescription, and while i was there I asked for a copy of my 'Celiac Panel' results to see what they tested.

Same as you, he only tested the ttG. He actually laughed at me when I asked for a copy.

I am very angry now, because now i don't know where I stand, and its too late because I"ve already started eating a gluten free diet and I can't go back now. If I had known they didn't test everything I would never have went gluten free before getting the testing.

People - learn from our mistakes! Go in armed with information and a LIST of the tests!:

Total IgA Serum

ttG - IgA

EMA - IgA

AGA - IgA

AGA - IgG

The doctors work for you - get what you want out of them or find someone who will listen.

lizard00 Enthusiast

Find a new doc!!! Did your PCP recommend this one? If not, and you like your PCP, ask them for a referral. Or do you know any nurses? They're always great to tell you who to see or not see.

I had a similar experience with the PA at my GP's office. CLUELESS!!!

I really love my GP, just not her PA. So, now, I insist that I see the GP instead. The GP sent me to the GI I currently have and I couldn't be happier with him.

ohsotired Enthusiast

leadmeastray - Precisely the reason I haven't just started the gluten-free diet yet, in case they screwed up and didn't do all the tests. I'm sorry you went through this too - I hope the diet is working for you.

lizard00 - Uhm........sort of (PCP recommending the GI)..........my PCP was on vacation, so I saw another doc in the office, and THAT doc referred me to this GI. Although, I may be looking for a new PCP too, as the last time I saw her she sort of 'pooh poohed' my claim of fatigue and told me to get more sleep. <_<

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.