Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Results


leadmeastray88

Recommended Posts

leadmeastray88 Contributor

I received my Enterolab results yesterday, here are the results:

A) Gluten Sensitivity Stool and Gene Panel Complete *Best test/best value

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 11 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 7 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score <300 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal anti-casein (cow's milk) IgA antibody 7 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0202

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 2,3 (Subtype 2,7)

Interpretation of Fecal Antigliadin IgA: Intestinal antigliadin IgA antibody was elevated, indicating that you have active dietary gluten sensitivity. For optimal health, resolution of symptoms (if you have them), and prevention of small intestinal damage and malnutrition, osteoporosis, and damage to other tissues (like nerves, brain, joints, muscles, thyroid, pancreas, other glands, skin, liver, spleen, among others), it is recommended that you follow a strict and permanent gluten free diet. As gluten sensitivity is a genetic syndrome, you may want to have your relatives screened as well.

Interpretation of Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA: The level of intestinal IgA antibodies to the human enzyme tissue transglutaminase was below the upper limit of normal, and hence, there is no evidence of a gluten-induced autoimmune reaction.

Interpretation of Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score: Provided that dietary fat is being ingested, a fecal fat score less than 300 indicates there is no malabsorbed dietary fat in stool indicating that digestion and absorption of nutrients is currently normal.

Interpretation of Fecal anti-casein (cow's milk) IgA antibody: Levels of fecal IgA antibody to a food antigen greater than or equal to 10 are indicative of an immune reaction, and hence immunologic "sensitivity" to that food. For any elevated fecal antibody level, it is recommended to remove that food from your diet. Values less than 10 indicate there currently is minimal or no reaction to that food and hence, no direct evidence of food sensitivity to that specific food. However, because 1 in 500 people cannot make IgA at all, and rarely, some people can still have clinically significant reactions to a food antigen despite the lack of a significant antibody reaction (because the reactions primarily involve T cells), if you have an immune syndrome or symptoms associated with food sensitivity, it is recommended that you try a strict removal of suspect foods from your diet for up to 12 months despite a negative test.

Interpretation Of HLA-DQ Testing: Although you do not possess the main HLA-DQB1 genes predisposing to celiac sprue (HLA-DQB1*0201 or HLA-DQB1*0302), HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of a gene that predisposes to gluten sensitivity (any DQ1, DQ2 not by HLA-DQB1*0201, or DQ3 not by HLA-DQB1*0302). Having two copies of a gluten sensitive gene means that each of your parents and all of your children (if you have them) will possess at least one copy of the gene. Two copies also means there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity may be more severe.

Looks like my parents are a recipe for disaster! :P

Obviously I'm not having any malabsorption problems, no problem with casein, just elevated IgA with 2 copies of gluten sensitivity genes.

Any suggestions?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

I say try the diet and see if the "proof is in the pudding".....gluten-free pudding of course. :D

The fact that you are reacting to gluten shows up. If you have symptoms, what do you have to lose?

leadmeastray88 Contributor

Thanks for your input!

I have been on the gluten-free diet already for about a month (minus some mistakes).

Most of my symptoms have improved/disappeared, so I'm pretty confident in my decision.

I just wanted to see what others thought about these results. :)

fedora Enthusiast

Enterolab has it's own way of gene testing.

There are 2 parts to the gene, the alpha part and the beta part. Enterolab only tests for the beta part. In cases like yours I wish they tested that too.

so the whole celiac genes are DQ2(really DQ2.5) and DQ8.

HOWEVER, two other genes if both present in a person can come together and make the celiac gene DQ2.

These two genes are DQ2.2( your gene HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0202 is it) and some of the DQ7 genes(your DQ7 gene HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0301 MAY be the other).

There is only one DQ2.2 gene so it is always half of the gene. There are several DQ7 variations. Only one of them is the other half of the celiac gene.

Based on the info given your DQ7 may be the variation that is the other half of the celiac gene. The only way to know for sure is with genetic testing for the alpha part of the gene. Kimball tests for alpha parts too, but then it is more money.

I only have the DQ2.2 gene(the half) without the other half. I never had bloodwork or a biopsy. However, my results on the diet indicated that I was having an autoimmune reaction to it. My malabsorption test was negative, but I had symptoms of that too. I feel soooooo much better without gluten. My Dr seems okay with assuming I have an autoimmune reaction caused by gluten intolerance since it has helped me so much.

good luck and take care

leadmeastray88 Contributor
Enterolab has it's own way of gene testing.

There are 2 parts to the gene, the alpha part and the beta part. Enterolab only tests for the beta part. In cases like yours I wish they tested that too.

so the whole celiac genes are DQ2(really DQ2.5) and DQ8.

HOWEVER, two other genes if both present in a person can come together and make the celiac gene DQ2.

These two genes are DQ2.2( your gene HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0202 is it) and some of the DQ7 genes(your DQ7 gene HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0301 MAY be the other).

There is only one DQ2.2 gene so it is always half of the gene. There are several DQ7 variations. Only one of them is the other half of the celiac gene.

Based on the info given your DQ7 may be the variation that is the other half of the celiac gene. The only way to know for sure is with genetic testing for the alpha part of the gene. Kimball tests for alpha parts too, but then it is more money.

I only have the DQ2.2 gene(the half) without the other half. I never had bloodwork or a biopsy. However, my results on the diet indicated that I was having an autoimmune reaction to it. My malabsorption test was negative, but I had symptoms of that too. I feel soooooo much better without gluten. My Dr seems okay with assuming I have an autoimmune reaction caused by gluten intolerance since it has helped me so much.

good luck and take care

Wow, what helpful information! Thank you so much.

That has peaked my curiosity, I'm going to look into the Kimball genetic testing.

Does anyone happen to have a link to the Kimball site, or where I could get more info?

-Kim

fedora Enthusiast

just google kimball gene testing.

Even without the full gene I have had such a positive recovery that I will not go back to eating gluten.

There are documented cases of people with celiac with only DQ2.2 or the DQ7 half gene and not with both. It is a very small number, but it has happened.

I will never know for sure and that is okay.

good luck

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching

    2. - knitty kitty replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching

    3. - knitty kitty replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching

    4. - Yaya replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,157
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bronco76
    Newest Member
    Bronco76
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yaya, from the JAMA study you refer to: "Taking 60,000 international units (IU) a day of vitamin D for several months has been shown to cause toxicity." No one on this forum is recommending  taking anywhere near that amount. We're talking about 5-10,000IU daily.
    • knitty kitty
      "Doses higher than the RDA are sometimes used to treat medical problems such as vitamin D deficiency, but these are given only under the care of a doctor for a specified time frame. Blood levels should be monitored while someone is taking high doses of vitamin D." Quoted from the Healthline article @Yaya linked above...  
    • knitty kitty
      https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2748796 If read carefully, this study @Yaya refers to was done on healthy people.   "Meaning  Among healthy adults, supplementation with higher doses of vitamin D did not result in improved bone health; further research would be needed to determine whether it is harmful." "...311 community-dwelling healthy adults without osteoporosis, aged 55 to 70 years, with baseline levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) of 30 to 125 nmol/L."   High dose Vitamin D doesn't have substantial benefits if your Vitamin D level is already normal. High dose Vitamin D is used to restore severely deficient Vitamin D levels to normal levels.  "...high-dose vitamin D therapy, as a useful tool to rapidly replete vitamin D status, may support immune function in the context of an acute or chronic infection" ...and... "Therefore, in the context of inflammation and conditions where anemia is prevalent, including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and critical illness, high-dose vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial in rapidly repleting and maintaining 25(OH)D concentrations and may serve as a complement to other treatment regimens to improve anemia." "Among those who had insufficient 25(OH)D (<75nmol/L) at baseline, the High Dose group improved significantly and to a comparatively greater degree on the PRM." These quotes are from the articles I posted earlier.
    • Yaya
      My cardio did not hand me a study.  He just determined the dose for my size/weight. Here is one that is 4 days old:  https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/how-much-vitamin-d-is-too-much This is the D study: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/vitamin-d-toxicity/faq-20058108 This is a boring video I'm watching on Celiac.    
    • Yaya
×
×
  • Create New...