Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy

TLymanP

Recommended Posts

TLymanP Rookie
TLymanP
Posted

HI all:),

Does anyone know if small intestinal biopsies are always conclusive for celiac? If your tests come back normal, does that mean you cant have celiac? I was just wondering because isnt it possible for the biopsy to come back normal, but still have damage in other places? I mean its just a small section. what if the section they took the biopsy on was normal(say in the duodenum) but there are othere spots(say in the jejunum: or however you spell it). Any input is appreciated!!

Tyler

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


celiac3270 Collaborator
celiac3270
Posted

Biopsies are not 100% accurate. If you get a positive result, that's usually pretty accurate, but if it comes out negative, you should not rule out celiac disease. Like you said, the damage can be in another area. So even if the samples they take show no damage, there could be a different section where the villi are completely gone. Also, if you have been eating little or no gluten, you might see little or no intestinal damage, even though you have celiac. That's why if someone who's been on the diet long enough (5-12 months for most) and they perform another biopsy, it will test negative for celiac disease, even if the person actually has the disease. Simply, you're right--it's not always accurate. If you have positive bloodwork or Enterolab results, I would find that conclusive enough in my mind and would not worry about negative biopsy results.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

Yes a biopsy can miss the diagnosis altogether. I know a lot of people who have had positive blood results but negative biopsies because of lack of damage or looking in the wrong areas. I agree with celiac3270, if you have blood test and Enterolab results that are positive then I would not worry if the biopsy was negative.

plantime Contributor
plantime
Posted

I was fortunate: the doc that did my endoscopy was looking specifically for damage. He said he saw patches that were red and inflamed, so he took the biopsy samples from those patches. Otherwise, the diagnosis would have been missed, because not all of my small intestine was damaged at the time. A doctor that is not so careful might have missed it, and I would still be consuming gluten and not getting better.

gf4life Enthusiast
gf4life
Posted

I had a doctor who didn't want to find any damage. She only took 3 samples and did not go very far into my intestines. She did not look for damaged spots, and I have a feeling that she would have taken the samples from a normal looking area, just to confirm her diagnosis of IBS...I hate feeling like this about her, but she absolutely refuses to accept that I feel better off gluten, and she won't even believe that I have the gene...

BTW, my biopsy was negative, and we opted out of biopsies for the kids. Their pediatric GI doesn't like to do them unless it is absolutely necessary. I was okay with them not having the biopsy.

God bless,

Mariann

Guest BellyTimber
Guest BellyTimber
Posted

Pardon my commenting on this:

a lot of you people are very cool about not having biopsies or not thinking them important.

I think that is massively healthy.

Over here in the UK the snag however is that doctors won't send you for one in good time.

There is a rumour going around the UK that if one takes gluten to make a biopsy work, the danger to health is extreme.

Is this correct?

Everything in the UK hinges on the doctor who is a state servant so I don't see any way of being able to get a meaningful certificate to show my employer to negotiate a reasonable attendance target for on & off ailments.

Parents who change their children's diet when young, seem to get kids that are healthier than a person who has ate wrong for 50 years, whatever other consequences ...(?)

Michael

Ruth UK Newbie
Ruth UK
Posted

Hi, 'Gapspan',

I, too, am from UK - just received +ve blood tests for celiac disease from Haematologist following VERY long term (almost 30 years) iron deficiency anaemia. Been referred to GE clinic (could take up to 17 weeks!) and dietician. Haematologist mentioned I 'might need a biopsy', but wasn't sure if I should go gluten free beforehand or not!

Because I'm really desparate to get a +ve biopsy, I've actually 'upped' my gluten intake! Probably a BAD idea, because now I have 'gastro' symptoms too. Mind, that's probably 'proof' in itself that I have celiac disease - but as you said in your post, may be it's actually dangerous??

I want a +ve biopsy because otherwise I still won't know why I've been anaemic for so long and why I have all the accompanying 'symptoms' that go along with anaemia. And at last I will be able to start getting myself better. (Also can't get gluten-free food on prescription without +ve biopsy - and I really need to be able to do that! And I want my drs to ckeck my children, and I'll have more 'ammunition' to convince them with if I get +ve result.)

I think my best plan will be to go 'low' gluten until I know exactly when biopsy date will be and then pile the gluten on for a few weeks before. Knowing the NHS it will be several weeks/months after I see the GE before the biopsy takes place. Mind, as much as I hate the long waits that happen sometimes, I do LOVE the NHS - it's (mostly) free and when you need care IMMEDIATELY you usually get it - at least my husband (re acute pancreatitis) and my son (re kidney problems) did.

Sorry - I'm 'waffling' as usual! I should be studying for my degree now, not writing an essay on the benefits or otherwise of the NHS!

All the best

Ruth

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast
MySuicidalTurtle
Posted

I personally do not think you need to have the biopsy done if you do not need it.

I was diagnosed with blood and improved 100% on the diet. The diagnosis made sense to me right away and I didn't think to go for further testing on it.

However, my brother had a biopsy done even though blood came back positive along with the fmaily line but he wanted to be more confirmed.

In instances like his I don't see any need to have the procedure but to have a double check.

I don't think I could ever go back on gluten just to see what a biopsy says.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,885
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    susieq312
    Newest Member
    susieq312
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      @Mynx, how long have you been gluten-free? I ask because many newly diagnosed celiacs react to many things, and often think their reactions are caused by gluten, when in fact, they are really caused by a combination of a sensitive gut due to damage, as well as additional food intolerance/leaky gut issues to other foods which may be temporary until their villi heal.
    • Scott Adams
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Many major brands of distilled vinegar in the USA, including Heinz white vinegar, are typically made from corn. In the United States, corn is a common and cost-effective raw material used in the production of distilled white vinegar. The process involves fermenting the sugars derived from corn into alcohol, which is then further fermented into acetic acid to produce vinegar. Distillation follows, which purifies the liquid and removes impurities, including any residual proteins or allergens. While the source of the vinegar (e.g., corn) is not always explicitly stated on the label, corn-derived vinegar is widely used in the food industry due to its neutral flavor and affordability. For individuals with gluten intolerance or celiac disease, distilled vinegar made from corn is generally considered safe, as the distillation process effectively removes gluten proteins. However, if you have concerns about cross-contamination or specific sensitivities, it’s always a good idea to contact the manufacturer directly to confirm the sourcing and production practices. Heinz, for example, has stated that their distilled white vinegar is gluten-free and safe for those with celiac disease, but verifying this information can provide additional peace of mind. The belief that distilled vinegar is gluten-free is rooted in the scientific understanding that gluten proteins, which are large and complex molecules, are generally too big to pass through the distillation process. Distillation involves heating a liquid to create vapor, which is then condensed back into a liquid form, leaving behind larger molecules like gluten proteins. However, the concern about cross-contamination arises from the possibility that gluten-containing ingredients may have been present in the liquid prior to distillation. While the distillation process itself is highly effective at removing gluten, the equipment used in production could potentially introduce trace amounts of gluten if not thoroughly cleaned between batches. For most individuals with gluten sensitivity or celiac disease, distilled vinegar is considered safe because the gluten content, if any, is typically below the threshold that would trigger a reaction. However, for those with extreme gluten intolerance or celiac disease, even trace amounts can cause adverse effects. This is why some individuals, like yourself, may choose to avoid commercially produced distilled vinegar and opt for alternatives like apple cider vinegar, which can be verified as gluten-free. The meticulous process of researching ingredients and preparing homemade products, such as ketchup, is indeed challenging but crucial for maintaining health and avoiding gluten exposure. It’s important to note that regulatory standards for gluten-free labeling vary by region, and in many places, products labeled "gluten-free" must contain less than 20 parts per million (ppm) of gluten, which is considered safe for the vast majority of people with celiac disease. Nonetheless, individual sensitivity levels can vary, and your approach highlights the importance of personalized dietary management for those with severe gluten intolerance.
    • Bebee
      Testing for celiac

      By Bebee · Posted

      I have been diagnosed with Microscopic Colitis (LC) for quite a few years, so I have been gluten-free and DF.  I would like to get tested for Celiac Disease because of the possibility of cross contamination and colon cancer.  And if you were hospitalized and didn't have a celiac diagnosis you could not get gluten-free food, I don't know if that is true or not.  Also because there is chance of colon cancer so I want to know if I have Celiac Disease and need to be on very restrictive diet.  The only testing I did was a sigmoid scope and Enter Lab but no gene testing.  I know I can go back to eating gluten for a few months, but I would worry you would have to stay home for the few months while getting gluten.  What other options do I have?  Should I do the gene testing?  Maybe through Entero Lab?  Any other tests?  How important is it to have Celiac diagnosed? Thank you! Barb
    • trents
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By trents · Posted

      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Mynx · Posted

      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
×
×
  • Create New...