Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Almond/cherry Cookies - Scd Legal! - And So Yummy!


ShayFL

Recommended Posts

ShayFL Enthusiast

I made these today. A modification of another recipe I found. I made them SCD legal and they are delicous:

Ingredients

* 2 1/2 cups blanched almond flour (I prefer the flour from digestive wellness over Bob's)

* 1/2 teaspoon celtic sea salt

* 1/2 teaspoon baking soda

* 1/4 cup honey

* 1/2 cup oil (I made mine with 1/4 cup coconut oil and 1 egg white because I tolerate eggs)

* 1/2 teaspoon vanilla extract

* 1 tablespoon almond extract (I used 2 for a more almond flavor)

* 1 cup cherry jam (I used digestive wellness brand which is SCD legal fruit and honey only)

Directions

1. In a large bowl, combine almond flour, baking soda and salt.

2. In a smaller bowl, combine oil, honey, vanilla and almond extract. (or honey, almond extract, vanilla, coconut oil and eggs if you want what I did)

3. Stir wet ingredients into dry.

4. Roll into 1 inch balls (give or take)

5. Place balls on parchment paper on top of a cookie sheet.

6. Press balls to 1/4 inch thick (give or take)

7. Put a dollop of cherry jam in the center of each cookie.

8. Bake at 350 for 6-9 minutes. Watch them. You want them to just start turning brown on the edges. Not too brown. My oven needed the full 9 minutes.

9. Cool and serve.

***If you are not SCD. Then you could use regular jam for these. Raspberry would also be good for those that can tolerate them.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Green12 Enthusiast

These sound really good. What can be used in place of the almond flour? I can't have almonds, would a regular flour work, or another nut meal?

ShayFL Enthusiast

Raspberry Hazelnut sounds good. I think pecan or walnut meal would be too strong of a taste and too oily.

I dont know if you could use gluten-free flour blend. You would likely need to add a binder like xanthum gum. You would have to experiment.

I know these ingredients arent cheap and I dont want to be to blame for a flop. :P

sickchick Community Regular

mmm :):):)

purple Community Regular
I made these today. A modification of another recipe I found. I made them SCD legal and they are delicous:

Ingredients

* 2 1/2 cups blanched almond flour (I prefer the flour from digestive wellness over Bob's)

* 1/2 teaspoon celtic sea salt

* 1/2 teaspoon baking soda

* 1/4 cup honey

* 1/2 cup oil (I made mine with 1/4 cup coconut oil and 1 egg white because I tolerate eggs)

* 1/2 teaspoon vanilla extract

* 1 tablespoon almond extract (I used 2 for a more almond flavor)

* 1 cup cherry jam (I used digestive wellness brand which is SCD legal fruit and honey only)

Directions

1. In a large bowl, combine almond flour, baking soda and salt.

2. In a smaller bowl, combine oil, honey, vanilla and almond extract. (or honey, almond extract, vanilla, coconut oil and eggs if you want what I did)

3. Stir wet ingredients into dry.

4. Roll into 1 inch balls (give or take)

5. Place balls on parchment paper on top of a cookie sheet.

6. Press balls to 1/4 inch thick (give or take)

7. Put a dollop of cherry jam in the center of each cookie.

8. Bake at 350 for 6-9 minutes. Watch them. You want them to just start turning brown on the edges. Not too brown. My oven needed the full 9 minutes.

9. Cool and serve.

***If you are not SCD. Then you could use regular jam for these. Raspberry would also be good for those that can tolerate them.

Sounds like a good recipe for Christmas or Valentine's Day and Today!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?

    2. - shell504 replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?

    3. - trents replied to filippa's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Mistakenly eating gluten

    4. - trents replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?

    5. - shell504 replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,885
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    macnult
    Newest Member
    macnult
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I would ask the GI doc about the elevated IGA score of 401. That one is what we commonly refer to as "total IGA" and also known as "Immunoglobulin A (IgA)". It could be nothing but it can also indicate some other health issues, some of them serious in nature. I would google potential causes for that if I were you. Also, if there is a chance the GI doc will want to do more testing for celiac disease, either antibody testing or an endoscopy with biopsy, you should not cut back on gluten consumption until all celiac disease testing is done. Otherwise, you will invalidate the testing.
    • shell504
      Hello. I apologize. I didn't know there wasn't a standard.  The standard listed  for the IGA is normal range 47-310.  The others were all listed as <15.0 u/l is antibody not detected and 15> antibody is detected.  And the negative one the standard is negative.  It is a normal PCP dr. I do have a second opinion appt scheduled with a GI specialist in 2 weeks. Honestly, I haven't cut out gluten at all. I just switched to whole fibers and everything has been getting better. She wanted to do the test just to check, which I was fine with. We'll see what the GI dr says. Thank you for commenting. 
    • trents
      It is also possible that since eating the fries you have been glutened again during the week. I would double check the food in your cupboard and reread the ingredient lists. Food companies can and do change their formulations from time to time such that something that used to be gluten free is no more. What I am saying is, don't assume the distress you are experiencing comes from one incident of glutening. There could, coincidentally, be another one on it's heels. 
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @shell504! The IGA 401mg/dl is not a test for celiac disease per se but a check to see if you are IGA deficient. People who are IGA deficient will produce celiac blood test antibody scores that are artificially low which can result in false negatives for the individual antibody tests such as the TTG IGA. You did not include reference ranges along with the test scores and since each laboratory uses custom reference range scales, we cannot comment with certainty, but from the sheer magnitude of the IGA score (401) it does not look like you are IGA deficient. And since there are no annotations indicating that the other test scores are out of range, it does not appear there is any antibody evidence that you have celiac disease. So, I think you are warranted in questioning your physician's dx of celiac disease. And it is also true that a colonoscopy cannot be used to dx celiac disease. The endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel is the appropriate procedure for diagnosing celiac disease. But unless there is a positive in the antibody testing, there is usually no justification for doing the endoscopy/biopsy. Is this physician a PCP or a GI doc? I think I would ask for a second opinion. It seems as though this physician is not very knowledgeable about celiac disease diagnositcs. Having said all that, it may be that you suffer from NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) rather than celiac disease. The two gluten disorders share many of the same GI symptoms. The difference is that NCGS does not damage the villous lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. The antidote for both is complete abstinence from gluten. Some experts believe NCGS can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. There is not test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. So, if it becomes apparent that gluten is causing distress and testing rules out celiac disease, then the diagnosis would be NCGS. Hope this helps. 
    • shell504
      I apologize i can't figure out how to get the picture on here.  Results were: IGA 401mg/dl Deamidated Gliadin IGG. <1.0 Deamidated Gliadin IGA. <1.0 Tissue Transglutaminase IGA AB. <1.0 Endomysial IGA. Negative.  Is she just going based off of the IGA alone? And because that is elevated, it's positive? The test states: "Results do not support a diagnosis of celiac disease." 
×
×
  • Create New...