Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused And Depressed


angieInCA

Recommended Posts

angieInCA Apprentice

3 weeks ago my Dr. (GP) said that she was about 90% sure I was Gluten Intollerent and suggested I go on the gluten-free diet. So gluten-free I went!

When I got the copy of all my tests that had been ran not one was for finding out if I had celiac disease. I called the Dr. office and asked if she planned on running any of the tests and she said "If the gluten-free diet is working why bother." But then suggested I see a GI for testing so "We can see what the extent of damage there might be and where to go from here". She said I didn't have to start eating Gluten again.

I found a Gastroentrologist in this area that was recommended for celiac disease. Called to make an appointment but I can't get in for 6 weeks. I asked the appointment taker (I know, not the best person to ask) if I should start eating Gluten again and she said if I was getting tested for celiac disease I should not be eating gluten. :huh:

So.........After doing much reading (on here and elsewhere) I decided to start eating Gluten again till the Dr. appointment because I want to make sure to give the test the full benefit of a positive exposure. I have been back on Gluten for 2 days and I am soooooooooo sick. Nausea, headache, pain in all my joints, pain on my left side, hips hurt so bad I can hardly walk or sit. I itch from my waist to the top of my head (no rash yet) especially on both of my forearms. Brain fog, extremely tired almost like I have a hangover with out the benefit of the drunk. And of course the dreaded diarrhea. Six times this morning in 3 hours.

I can't imagine going through this for 6 weeks. And that is just for the first consult appt. Am I thinking about this all wrong. Should I really be doing this to my body?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

It's obvious that you have either Celiac Disease, a gluten intolerance or a gluten allergy. The diet is a diagnosis in itself.

Sometimes it does seem like a very dumb thing to do by making yourself sick, do further damage, just so that MAYBE that damage can show up for doctors to be satisfied. Your doctor said that he/she was 90% sure you have Celiac, is the remaining 10% worth feeling sick as a dog?

Angie, my advise would be, that if it makes you that sick, stop. Go back to the gluten free diet and feel better. You already know that you have an issue with Gluten. Listen to your body.

Whatever you choose, I hope you feel better soon.

Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

What Momma Goose said is right on. If gluten makes you sick and you feel better not eating it then you have a problem with gluten and you shouldn't eat it. It sounds like you already know the answer to your health problems - gluten free! You could be doing your body more harm then good by eating gluten for the next 6 weeks. Your body is telling you something! Listen to it. Good luck!

Nancym Enthusiast

I'm with them, why do this to yourself for a test that a lot of people seem to get false negatives from?

angieInCA Apprentice

Thank you for your responses, you just keep confirming what I feel.

I guess I should explain why I want to give the tests every opportunity to be positive.

I KNOW I have a problem with gluten and will avoid gluten the rest of my life.

But.......I have two children ages 19 and 23 who I believe show some signs of celiac disease but refuse to listen to me. But heck, what do I know, I'm only their Mom and if it took me 47 years to figure this out then they don't have to worry about any damage untill they really have to, Right?

They really are great kids and are very supportive especially after they saw what just 3 weeks off gluten did for me. But when I broach the subject that they should get tested, their response is "well you haven't been tested so you don't know if this is really what is wrong".

So, I guess I'm looking for solid confirmation so I can be a bit more pushy with my adult children.

After all the research I have done, I have no doubt I have suffered with this all my life, It explains so much of the unexplainable. I just wish to hopefully keep my kids from going through the same things.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Thank you for your responses, you just keep confirming what I feel.

I guess I should explain why I want to give the tests every opportunity to be positive.

I KNOW I have a problem with gluten and will avoid gluten the rest of my life.

But.......I have two children ages 19 and 23 who I believe show some signs of celiac disease but refuse to listen to me. But heck, what do I know, I'm only their Mom and if it took me 47 years to figure this out then they don't have to worry about any damage untill they really have to, Right?

They really are great kids and are very supportive especially after they saw what just 3 weeks off gluten did for me. But when I broach the subject that they should get tested, their response is "well you haven't been tested so you don't know if this is really what is wrong".

So, I guess I'm looking for solid confirmation so I can be a bit more pushy with my adult children.

After all the research I have done, I have no doubt I have suffered with this all my life, It explains so much of the unexplainable. I just wish to hopefully keep my kids from going through the same things.

First you have a good doctor. If that doctor is 90% sure after you tell him the result of your gluten challenge that will go up to 100%. Dietary exclusion and challenge really are valid forms of diagnosis and it sounds like your doctor knows this. I am willing to bet that he has already noted it in your chart. He may back you up on the need for testing of your young people. But be forwarned sometimes even if they do get diagnosed they may refuse to do the diet anyway. Voice of experience here, unfortunately. :(

You may also want to consider having Enterolab testing done. They can test even if you have been off gluten for a bit. They do not formally diagnose but they can look for antibodies and they also do gene testing. That may be another route to go.

ECD Newbie

I'm just beginning the testing process, as well, and the idea of eating gluten again seems daunting. I'm sorry you are having such a difficult time with it!

I was just wondering that if there might actually be some beneficial medical reason for know if it is celiac disease vs. gluten intolerance vs. gluten allergy, like someone mentioned? I know the overall diet would be the same in all cases, but is there a possibility that if it's an allergy you might need an epipen or something? I was just curious if anyone knew?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mftnchn Explorer

My thought is that you could try to call the GI office again but don't talk to the appointment taker---she had no business answering your question in my opinion. Ask for the nurse. Explain what has happened. Some GI's would diagnose you from just your dietary response. Others will say it is not important. Then ask if you go off gluten and end up with negative testing how they will explain your dietary strong response.

Who knows? You might get some help with this, and if not, you can still do Enterolab, and make your own decision regardless.

I hear you about adult children. Could be though if you really improve and they notice a difference they will eventually give credence.

bsiyatadshmayah Newbie
I was just wondering that if there might actually be some beneficial medical reason for know if it is celiac disease vs. gluten intolerance vs. gluten allergy, like someone mentioned? I know the overall diet would be the same in all cases, but is there a possibility that if it's an allergy you might need an epipen or something? I was just curious if anyone knew?

Thanks!

From what I've read, wheat allergies could cause potentially life-threatening reactions very quickly, such as an anaphylactic attack. Yet, the symptoms between celiac disease and wheat allergies can also very similar. I know of a little guy who you'd swear has Dermetitis Herpetiformis (a form of celiac disease) by looking at him, and the doctors were sure that was what he had, at first. But his very thorough intestinal pictures (they looked through the entire intestinal tract) were negative, as were his blood tests. His family later found a clinic that specializes in food allergies, and his IgE levels was out of this world. There is only one other patient at that clinic, an adult, with higher IgE levels. It has taken over a year of being gluten free for his skin to improve. His wheat allergies (and other food allergies) were potentially life threatening from the loss of skin coverage alone, as well as from the severe malnutrition, and it was obvious he was malnourished, in spite of having a phenomenal cook for a mother.

Another difference between a wheat allergy and gluten intolerance or celiac disease is that one can grow out of food allergies. One doesn't grow out of celiac disease. Untreated celiac disease can lead to other serious illnesses. So, in my opinion, it is important to get a definitive diagnosis if at all possible. I am currently on that path, and it is very, very inconvenient, uncomfortable and annoying, to say the least.

Thus far, and I am only 10 weeks into the process, I personally advocate pursuing the diagnosis. 'Course, I'm already very tired of eating all this bread and all these noodles. I was pretty much grain free for more than 5 years due to a Candida Albicans overgrowth diagnosis that mysteriously kept returning. I barely consider most bread, crackers and noodles food anyway. So, I'm on a high "gunk" diet in my opinion, and I drool at the sight of a plate of sauted veggies, which I can barely find room for after two slices of bread. Plus, I'm gaining weight and my wardrobe is shrinking. So I'm not a hardliner on this. It really depends on one's circumstances. Mine necessitate a definitive diagnosis if possible. BUT, it may not be possible and that has to be recognized. I think there may be many variables that aren't yet recognized.

home-based-mom Contributor
Thank you for your responses, you just keep confirming what I feel.

I guess I should explain why I want to give the tests every opportunity to be positive.

I KNOW I have a problem with gluten and will avoid gluten the rest of my life.

But.......I have two children ages 19 and 23 who I believe show some signs of celiac disease but refuse to listen to me. But heck, what do I know, I'm only their Mom and if it took me 47 years to figure this out then they don't have to worry about any damage untill they really have to, Right?

They really are great kids and are very supportive especially after they saw what just 3 weeks off gluten did for me. But when I broach the subject that they should get tested, their response is "well you haven't been tested so you don't know if this is really what is wrong".

So, I guess I'm looking for solid confirmation so I can be a bit more pushy with my adult children.

After all the research I have done, I have no doubt I have suffered with this all my life, It explains so much of the unexplainable. I just wish to hopefully keep my kids from going through the same things.

You might consider having a gene test. Depending on the results you kids might respond to that as they each have half of your genes! :P

Also print out some of the damage that can happen from long term undiagnosed celiac. They might listen to that, too. :blink:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.