Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Just Received Test Results


grannygogo

Recommended Posts

grannygogo Newbie

I just received a copy of my blood test results from the lab today. My doctors have not yet called to let me know what they mean. I think I understand that I have tested in the normal range for both test for Celiacs and therefore I don't have the disease. Can someone out there help me ? I hate to wait till Monday. Here are my results and the ranges they have marked as normal.

Result Reference Range

IgA 247 [70-400] mg/dl

tTG IgA 4 [0-19] EU

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Terri

p.s. I have several symptoms.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lizard00 Enthusiast

Welcome to the forum!! :D

Well, according to your blood work, your test is negative. HOWEVER, that doesn't mean you don't have Celiac. Testing can only confirm, not rule out, as the tests can be negative... mine were. Have you already tried the gluten-free diet? That can also have a bearing on the results of your test. If you haven't tried it, that's really the key. If it makes you feel better and improves your health, then you know to avoid it.

I want to add: There are many on here who believe that if you have a Ttg number at all, there is a reaction going on, and that in itself could be indicative of Celiac. That's still up for debate though... but the philosophy is: Having a little reaction to gluten is like being a little pregnant. You either react, or you don't.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes you could still be celiac with a negative blood test. Up to 30% of us do show up negative on blood work, unfortunately. That negative result can result in years and years of deteriorating health before a doctor is smart enough to tell us to try the diet. Most will see that result and not look any furthur. If just one of the fancy specialists had told me to try the diet during all those years of repeated testing and repeated negatives my life and that of my children would have been quite different.

If you are planning on a biopsy then wait to go gluten-free but if you have finished with testing do try the diet for a few months strictly. That is the best test. You also could go with Enterolab, they can test for antibodies in the stool and although they technically don't diagnose you they can tell you if the antibodies are there. You wouldn't produce antibodies to a substance if your body does not see it as poison.

leadmeastray88 Contributor

I'm not very good at test results, but something else you might want to consider is that they didn't do the complete Celiac panel. Here's all the tests they should have run:

EMA (Immunoglobulin A anti-endomysium antibodies)

AGA (IgA anti-gliadin antibodies)

AGG (IgG anti-gliadin antibodies)

tTGA (IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase)

Looks like they only did the AGA and tTGA for you.

The purpose of the other tests is to rule out the fact that you may be IgA deficient (which means you can't produce enough IgA antibodies) therefore skewing the results.

Before going gluten free, you may want to ask for these tests first just to be sure.

Then, I would try a strict gluten free diet for a few months and see what happens. Some people find that cutting out dairy and/or soy for the first bit is helpful also.

Good luck and welcome!

Kim

nora-n Rookie

I too had anumber on ttg-test. I had been low-gluten before that for months. Thinking back I think it is significant.

I am planning on getting a positive DH test instead, but I might have to wait until I get glutened so mudh that I break out with a DH rash. I had a biopsy for DH, but it was takenwhen I did not have an outbreak.

The Ttg-tests are calibrated to only be positive when the villi are severly damaged, so negative tests are common becasue they are very much concerned about tests being specific, so they set an extremely high cutoff.

There was an article here on celic.com about some cientits sending out blood samples of confirmed celiacs to different labs, and half of the labs said the tests were negative.....

You might want to ask for the rest of the celiac tests, like antigliadin, which is widely available but they say more people test positive on that one, so they wanto avoid it becasue they do not want to diagnose so many patients and put them on this "horrible" diet...

(In longitudinal studies, they tested relatives of diagnosed celiacs over many years and they first had positive antigliadin tests, then positive ttg tests, and then they had positive biopsies)

You could also get a gene test, either private in case they use it against you if you are not DQ2 or 8, or through the doctor.

nora

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,836
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Art Glassman
    Newest Member
    Art Glassman
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @ABP2025, Here's some studies and articles that will help you learn more about thiamin and all... I will write more later. It's possible that your antibiotic for giardiasis has caused thiamine deficiency.   https://hormonesmatter.com/metronidazole-toxicity-thiamine-deficiency-wernickes-encephalopathy/ And... https://hormonesmatter.com/thiamine-deficiency-testing-understanding-labs/ And... Thiamine and benfotiamine: Focus on their therapeutic potential https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682628/ and... Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/      
    • DayaInTheSun
      Interesting you mention MCAS. I have come across mcas before but I wasn’t entirely sure if that’s what it was. When I eat certain food like dairy or soy my face gets so hot and I feel flush and my heart rate shoot’s up. And sometimes my bottom lip swells or I get hives somewhere. This started happening after I had a really bad case of Covid.  Before that I was able to eat all those things (minus gluten) I was diagnosed with celiac way before I had Covid.  Hmm, not sure really. I may look for a different allergist my current one told me to take Zyrtec and gave me an epi pen. 
    • Kiwifruit
      This is all really useful information, thank you so much to you both.    I have a history of B12 and vit D deficiency which has always just been treated and then ignored until it’s now again.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Gill.brittany8! There are two main genes that have been identified as creating potential for developing celiac disease, HLDQ2 and HLDQ8. Your daughter has one of them. So, she possesses genetic the potential to develop celiac disease. About 40% of the general population carries one or both of these genes but only about 1% of the general population develops celiac disease. It takes both the genetic potential and some kind of triggering stress factor (e.g., a viral infection or another prolonged health problem or an environmental factor) to "turn on" the gene or genes. Unfortunately, your daughter's doctor ordered a very minimal celiac antibody panel, the tTG-IGA and total IGA. Total IGA is not even a test per celiac disease per se but is a check for IGA deficiency. If the person being checked for celiac disease is IGA deficient, then the scores for individual IGA tests (such as the tTG-IGA) will be abnormally low and false negatives can often be the result. However, your daughter's total IGA score shows she is not IGA deficient. You should consider asking our physician for a more complete celiac panel including DGP-IGA, TTG_IGG and DGP-IGG. If she had been avoiding gluten that can also create false negative test results as valid antibody testing requires having been consuming generous amounts of gluten for weeks leading up to the blood draw. Do you know if the GI doc who did the upper GI took biopsies of the duodenum and the duodenum bulb to check for the damage to the small bowel lining caused by celiac disease? Having said all that, her standard blood work shows evidence of possible celiac disease because of an elevated liver enzyme (Alkaline Phosphatase) and low values for hemoglobin.
    • Gill.brittany8
      Hi everyone  After years of stomach issues being ignored by doctors, my 9 y/o daughter finally had an upper endoscopy which showed a ton of stomach inflammation. The GI doctor ordered some bloodwork and I’m attaching the results here. Part will be from the CBC and the other is celiac specific. I’m not sure what’s relevant so I’m just including extra information just in case.   The results are confusing because they say “No serological evidence of celiac disease. tTG IgA may normalize in individuals with celiac disease who maintain a gluten-free diet. Consider HLA DQ2 and DQ8 testing to rule out celiac disease.” But just a few lines down, it says DQ2 positive. Can someone help make sense of this? Thanks so much.  result images here: https://ibb.co/WFkF0fm https://ibb.co/kHvX7pC https://ibb.co/crhYp2h https://ibb.co/fGYFygQ  
×
×
  • Create New...