Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Shows No Evidence Of Celiac...is It Still Possible To Have It?


Wrigley

Recommended Posts

Wrigley Newbie

Hi everyone,

I've been having GI problems since April and a variety of other issues involving thrush, fuzzy (yellow tongue), weakness, headaches, redness and pimples on the scalp.

I had a blood test for Celiac Disease which came up as a partial positive. One antibody was high and the other was normal. I then had an endoscopy in July and they biopsied the small intestine. It came back as no evidence of Celiac Disease.

My question is: Is it possible to have Celiac even if an endoscopy shows no evidence?

A couple other things to note:

When this first started a CT scan showed an inflamed colon..colitis. I had a colonoscopy which came out clean. I then had a cystoscopy and that was clean. A upper GI/small bowel X-ray showed only a sliding hiatal hernia (incidental finding).

Any insight would be appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

The different explanations I've read about around here: endoscopy looks for damage in the small intestine. That damage doesn't develop overnight. So it is possible that if you haven't been ill for very long, that you just haven't developed enough damage to be seen yet. In that case a repeat endoscopy in a couple years might give a different result.

Another reason could also be that the damage is patchy, and it was simply missed. There is quite a lot of intestine and the scope doesn't really reach all that far.

Of course it's also possible that you really don't have celiac and that there is another explanation for your symptoms. The difficulty is that our GI tract only has a couple of ways of saying that it feels bad, so different GI conditions have similar symptoms. <_<

Pauliina

mftnchn Explorer

Also from what I have read, some damage is microscopic only, so depends on a good lab technician to read it, too, assuming it is caught in the biopsy selection.

Wrigley Newbie

Thanks guys. Would you recommend I get the gene test?

ShayFL Enthusiast

If you can get your insurance to pay....by all means get the gene test. It is not diagnostic, but another piece to the puzzle. You might be more inclined to try the diet if you have the genes which could result in better health.

In my case...NEG blood...refused biopsy...NEG genes....POS response to the diet.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

It depends on how anxious you are to have an official piece of paper saying you have celiac disease.

If you have other autoimmune issues, such as thyroid, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis,fibromyalgia, lupus, MS, etc., or if you have GERD (is commonly caused by gluten intolerance), you might want to just try a gluten-free diet and see if your symptoms improve. Gluten intolerance/celiac disease can cause a whole host of other problems. Many people with neuro problems also find that a gluten-free diet helps more than medicine. There is even a recent study indicating that bipolar symptoms can be directly caused by gluten in susceptible individuals (corroborated by members here on this board).

If your symptoms do resolve on a gluten-free diet, I'd say you have just as good an answer as you could get--without the expense of testing and doctor's appointments, and without investing TIME, and without depending on the limited competence of most doctors today, who were not taught about celiac in medical school (until the last couple of years, it was thought of as an extremely rare condition). If they don't, then you'd need to keep looking (and then you ought to research things like Lyme Disease, candida, mercury toxicity, mold sensitivity, etc.).

mftnchn Explorer

What you need as far as a diagnosis is an individual decision and all decisions are respected here.

Going through the testing involved may find another problem altogether or confirm this as the main problem. A firm diagnosis may make it easier in terms of family members, especially because confirmed celiac in the family means all first degree relatives should be tested.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Can you get a copy of your bloodwork and post what tests were run, your results, and the reference ranges?

Can you get a copy of your endoscopy report, and post the findings, including how many biopsies were taken?

The answer is, yes, depending on a variety of factors, you could still have Celiac. You could have a non-Celiac gluten problem, or a problem not related at all to Celiac/gluten. Provide us some more information, and hopefully we can give you some more ideas.

Best of luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,049
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AMCONRAD
    Newest Member
    AMCONRAD
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      69.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'm not a gastro doctor, but it seems reasonable to conclude that they would be able to spot any cancer-related issues during the endoscopy, at least in the areas that were checked.
    • Matt13
      Sorry cut out. Scott! Thanks You are really the master of this things! Thanks! One more question please, i did 2 EGD. In first EGD there was taken 2 samples from duodenum where they found MARSH 3b. In second EGD after 1year (i described in first post of this topic) they have taken multiple Samples from duodenum and jejunum and everything is ok (other than some of the samples is not readable but the explanation is very small and short, villi form good samples is OK and  they only found inflammation in lamina propria. Sorry, I am little overwhelm by this and scared so dr.google almost every-time frightens me. Would my GI and histology expert doctor see if there were like something serious like small bowel cancer or neoplasms(especially in histology)?  
    • Matt13
      Scott! Thanks You are really the master of this things! Thanks! One more question please, i did 2 EGD. In first EGD there was taken 2 samples from duodenum where they found MARSH 3b. In second EGD after 1year (i described in first post of this topic) they have taken multiple Samples from duodenum and jejenum. Would doctor GI and histology expert doctor see if there were like something serious like small bowel cancer or neoplasms(especially in histology)?
    • Scott Adams
      It's quite common for the mucosa to appear normal during an endoscopy in patients with celiac disease, especially in cases of Marsh 3a or 3b histological changes. Studies have shown that the "naked eye" assessment of the small intestine during endoscopy often misses the subtle changes associated with early or less severe villous atrophy. This is why multiple biopsies from different parts of the duodenum, including the bulb, are essential for a reliable diagnosis. Visual clues like scalloping, nodularity, or atrophy may not always be visible, particularly in patients with less advanced disease. In fact, research indicates that histology can reveal significant findings even when the mucosa looks normal on endoscopy, reinforcing the need for biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease. For anyone preparing to have an endoscopy, it's important to ensure that your gastroenterologist takes multiple biopsies from various areas to increase the likelihood of an accurate diagnosis.
    • Matt13
      Thanks Scott! One more question how many of celiac had normal mucosa on naked eye (i mean endoscopy) but histology was postive like marsh 3 a or b?  
×
×
  • Create New...