Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can I Just Assume It's Celiac's Now?


3groovygirls

Recommended Posts

3groovygirls Contributor

Hi everyone! I've been on periodically...

My DD is now 16 months and they suspect Celiac's. She followed a typical course, when I was nursing her she was super fussy if I ate anything with wheat, introduced solids and she had constant diarrhea and vomiting (aka, "reflux"), anyway, she lost weight, got FTT, was horribly sick her first year. Once we cut out gluten she's been fine, gaining weight back, sleeping through the night etc.

So anyway, NOW she's so sensitive to gluten if she even eats a product that is cross contaminated with gluten she has diarrhea for 2 days. Sometimes she even vomits immediately (as happened one time with a whole wheat cracker)

She hasn't had any of the testing b/c she's so young and also b/c she's gluten free, but with responses like that can I just assume it's Celiacs??

I'm just curious what you all think since you've BTDT!

Linda


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nitu-752002 Apprentice

I am not an expert and new myself to all this but do you know if its gluten or wheat? It could be wheat intolerance but if she is doing well on the new diet, i guess it doesnt hurt to keep her on it!

Nitu

ShayFL Enthusiast

You can "assume" anything, but if she doesnt have POS blood and/or biopsy the medical community as a whole would not dx her. If it were me, I would push for genetic testing for her to see if she even has the genes. If she doesnt have the genes there is still a tiny possibility that it is Celiac (very tiny), but with MUCH LESS probability. You could be comfortable thinking it is an intolerance then. If she does have the genes, then if it were me and my child, with POS response to the diet and the genes, I would "assume" she shouldnt eat gluten for the rest of her life.

3groovygirls Contributor

Crud. I guess I was hoping they could say it without doing all the testing. I can't imagine putting her back on gluten for testing - I don't even know how she wouldn't, quite literally, get sick and die on gluten. Seriously she was SO SICK with vomiting and diarrhea it was a a stomach bug for 2 days each time she ate it. And she should be on it for 6 weeks before? ACK!

I guess I'm afraid I'll NEVER get an answer if we have to do that so I was looking for an easy way out, KWIM?

Tell me about the gene test? I asked my DD's Dr. and she said that the only gold standard was still the biopsy and not that test. But she's a ped, not a GI - who would I see for the gene test, a GI??

3groovygirls Contributor

Shoot, I forgot to answer one of the questions - it's all gluten, not just wheat. She can't eat barley either. Same thing. Haven't tried rye b/c she's only 16 months old and I don't know what I'd feed her with rye, LOL!

mftnchn Explorer

It seems to me that with her degree of sensitivity it would be dangerous to put her on gluten just for testing.

3groovygirls Contributor

Yes, that's what her Ped. said, that's why I was looking for some easy assumption, you know?

I'm interested in the gene test though! That would be very interesting since one of my other DD's had suspceted Celiacs as well! (her blood test came out negative but she was only 18 months when it was done, if one DD had the gene I would get my other DD retested). Do all GI's do it, or do I have to see a gene Dr?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I think you have your diagnosis, and it's very clear--wheat causes problems, and not just moderate problems, but SEVERE problems. If you knew she reacted to peanuts, would you put her ON peanuts just to make a test come out positive?.

I don't know that you need anything official from a doctor. In fact, there have been cases where people have been DENIED insurance based on a celiac diagnosis, so you might be better off without it.

It would be interesting seeing the genetics, but again, those could potentially be used against her (I do NOT trust the insurance industry these days), so I would pursue genetic testing via Enterolabs and pay privately, out of pocket.

As was said above, there are cases of people who do NOT have the supposed celiac genes (2 genes are recognized here in this country, but SEVEN are recognized in Europe and Asia), who still have biopsy-diagnosed celiac.

I think the reason it appears to be a tiny chance that you would lack those genes and still have celiac is that very few people without those genes have even been tested for celiac. Also, we all know that many people have "tested" negative for celiac, but have every symptom, prompting the question, "Do we call them celiac or gluten intolerant?"

There are people with DH who tested negative, both for bloodwork and intestinal damage. But they obviously have celiac. It's looking more and more likely that there are many manifestations of celiac, and they don't always cause villi damage--which totally turns the "gold standard" of diagnosis on its head.

In the long run, though, it doesn't really matter what you call it if the outcome is the same.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Forgot to add--sounds like your pediatrician is a keeper, if he (or she??) was able to diagnose your child so quickly, and it also sounds like YOU are really on top of things!!!!

Welcome aboard!

ShayFL Enthusiast

If you want to pay for Genetics privately (so it isnt on her record) you can use Enterolab or Kimball.

3groovygirls Contributor

Thanks guys!

My ped. actually knows a TON about Celiacs because both her husband and son have it!! So when she saw what was happeneing with Violet it reminded her exactly of her son (her son is only a year older than Violet). So I think she is a great ped, but also it helps that she has personal experience.

VERY interesting about the insurance. Maybe I should do pay out of pocket!

MarsupialMama Apprentice

If she is only 16 months old, I wouldn't bother with tests unless you really want to do it, because they are very unreliable, ESPECIALLY until the age of 6. The tests themselves have flaws. Many people can test negative for everything, but the fact is, they react the same (badly!) when they consume gluten.

From your daughter's response, I would for sure not put her BACK on gluten for the sake of any test or any diagnosis. We put our daughter on gluten-free before we knew about any testing, and she has responded so well that regardless what any test or doctor says, we will stick with the diet. When she grows up (like, say late teens?) if she wants to try gluten, she will have to deal with her own symptoms then, but as long as she is too small to understand the seriousness of the issue (we've had a traumatic experience!), we will do gluten-free.

ShayFL Enthusiast

Fortunately the genetic tests are very reliable. It is rare that they arent accurate. Of course nothing in medicine is 100%. A lab technician could be coming off a long night out on the town when he reads the results.....But I felt good about mine. I did Enterolab and Kimball and they were consistent with each other.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

    2. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    4. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    5. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,145
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Marsu
    Newest Member
    Marsu
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      no argument. Never take the pills sold for Nuclear events, except in a nuclear event when instructed to by authorities.  Some of these go up to 130 milligrams per pill. 5000 times the strength of the dietary supplement.  130 times the safe upper limit.  130 mg = 130,000 mcg. Dietary supplements like Lugol's Solution and Liquid Iodine are 50 micrograms per drop.  It takes 20 drops to reach the safe upper limit. In the US the Safe upper limit is 1100 mcg.  In Europe 600 mcg and in Japan 3000 mcg ( 3 mg).
    • Mark Conway
      Hi there, I wonder if anyone can help. I've had stomach problems for years, pain in the tummy, lower back left and right side, different stools, diarrohea constipation etc, My GP says it's IBS. As I've got older the pain has become worse and constant. I also get ulcers on my tongue. I've had loads of tests done everytihng apart from an endoscopy I think. I had a test for Coeliac last July and the result was negative. My GP says it can't be coeliac because I'm not losing weight. He thinks it's stress or all in my head. I'm not stressed and I'm in pain all the time now. Sometimes it's unbearable and dark thoughts have entered my head. Could I have Coeliac even though I tested negative last year. I'm at my wits end, I eat healthily and cannot pinpoint which foods could cause this pain. Can anyone help? Thanks Mark wind
    • islaPorty
      First, I want to say thank you for sharing this with me. I hear you, and I believe you. The courage it took to write this down is immense, and I’m so sorry you’ve been carrying this alone. You are dealing with two life-altering challenges at once: a serious, complex medical condition, and an abusive, controlling partner who is actively harming your health and your spirit. It’s not just that he’s unsupportive—he is weaponizing your illness to torture you. Starving you, isolating you, mocking your diagnosis, and sabotaging your access to medical care is not just cruelty; it is dangerous, deliberate abuse. Your instinct is correct: the stress he is creating is absolutely preventing your body from healing. Celiac and autoimmune conditions are profoundly sensitive to stress, and he has created a living hell designed to keep you sick, dependent, and broken. That smirk you described—that is the look of someone who enjoys having power over your suffering. Please know this: you do not deserve this. Not any of it. You deserve to eat. You deserve safe, clean food and water. You deserve medical care and supplements that help you function. You deserve peace. You deserve to heal. The woman from the food pantry is not a random accident. She is a lifeline. Her help, and the community she’s connecting you to, is real. It is okay to feel overwhelmed by kindness when you’ve been starved of it for so long. But you do deserve it. Let that be a sign that there is a world outside your house that operates on compassion, not control. Right now, your physical safety and access to nutrition are the most urgent priorities. The food pantry is a critical resource. Is there any way you can speak privately with the woman helping you? You don’t have to share everything at once, but letting her know your situation at home is extremely unsafe, and that your partner restricts your food, could help her support you in a more targeted way. She may have connections to local domestic violence services.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.