Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Clould This Be The Answer?!


bakingbarb

Recommended Posts

bakingbarb Enthusiast

Celiac untreated causes malabsorption, which leads to vitamin deficiencies. Without B12 you have malabsorption issues, which leads to the BIG D. The BIG D leads to more malabsorption and the vicious cycle goes on and on and on...

SO I started taking the sub-lingual B at the beginning of this week and this is the first time I haven't had the BIG D every dang day. I am on the verge of being excited. Here all this time I have been looking for what else might I be allergic to, or what food has wheat hidden in it (chips for example) and so on. I was sitting in front of the computer crying and just about to give up on a solution. Instead I looked for one more thing and found about about the B12 and away we go....

It is too soon to say this is the answer but I am so hopeful and am going to the Dr pretty soon. A new Dr because the last one didn't do anything regarding the Celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

That's very interesting, Barb, thanks for posting it.

Are there any easily absorbable food sources of B12, or is sub-lingual B12 the only option?

RiceGuy Collaborator
Are there any easily absorbable food sources of B12, or is sub-lingual B12 the only option?

Unfortunately not. B12 from food requires various parts of the digestive system to get digested and absorbed. While I'm sure there's more to it than what I've read, I do know it takes something called Intrinsic Factor, which is produced by the stomach. Antacids (and some other things) can decrease or destroy the stomach's ability to produce Intrinsic Factor, which would mean supplementation for life. However, it's more complicated than that, because the intestines have to do their job, so that the B12 can get absorbed into the bloodstream. From there it goes to the liver, which makes the final conversion to the forms that the body requires.

So basically, the sublingual B12 bypasses this entire process, getting B12 in useful form straight into the bloodstream. If you take methylcobalamin, it will not require conversion by the liver either. Though the most common form being sold is cyanocobalamin, which does require the liver, and unfortunatelly contains cyanide as the coenzyme :o

That's basically what I know about the assimilation of B12.

I am wondering though, if some other ingredient in the sublingual is causing a slight slowdown in digestion, stopping the big D like Imodium or something. My sublingual has no such effect. But I can certainly accept that perhaps you just needed the supplement, and I hope that's what it is.

  • 4 weeks later...
bakingbarb Enthusiast
That's very interesting, Barb, thanks for posting it.

Are there any easily absorbable food sources of B12, or is sub-lingual B12 the only option?

The issue is in the stomach so this bypasses that issue, I have read this is as effective as the shots.

The Dr visit was interesting. She did blood work and I am low in my D and my B was high because I am taking the sublingual. I don't know what anything else was because she didn't mention it over the phone. When I go see her I will find out the rest.

Interestingly enough I like her but the food allergy testing came back and it said I am not allergic to wheat so I don't have Celiac but I am still unable to digest it thats all. SIGH I really like her and I am hoping she educates her self more regarding the Celiac.

I have found there are all kinds of "clinics" out there that would probably be great for someone with Celiac but they never take insurance. Whats with that?

There is an IBS clinic in Seattle and one that tests for stomach acid too high or too low and treats for nutritional deficiencies but none of them take insurance. I understand its easier for them but expect us to pay cash upfront. Hmm that won't work for me!

rumbles Newbie

Celiac isn't an allergy to wheat. Allergy testing will not tell if someone

has or doesn't have celiac disease. If the doctor is telling you that you

don't have celiac disease because you don't have an allergy to wheat,

you might want to consider looking for another doctor.

Some of us call celiac an allergy (usually when ordering food) because

allergies are something that most people in the foodservice business

understand without us having to give a long explanation that they probably

wouldn't either believe or understand. It's used as a bit of a fib to keep us

from getting glutened.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
the food allergy testing came back and it said I am not allergic to wheat so I don't have Celiac

Celiac is NOT a food allergy! It's not an allergy at all, but an autoimmune response, where the immune system is triggered by gluten to attack YOU (intestines, joints, skin, thyroid, brain, pancreas, etc.).

Allergy testing shows if you are allergic to something, not if you have a dangerous autoimmune response to it. You need a celiac panel (bloodwork). Please see www.celiac.com for the info.

ang1e0251 Contributor

There are three issues with wheat. It took me a long time to wrap my brain around it.

Wheat allergy; those tests you took to see if you had a histamine reaction to wheat. You know, like you might have to ragweed? You tested negative, no histamine reaction. You are not allergic.

Celiac disease; you start with a blood panel for celiac disease, just as the other posters referenced. This measures your autoimmune response. If this is positive, you may be referred for an endoscopy of the small intestine. If performed and read correctly, this should show any villi damage you may have. Damaged villi warrent the dx of celiac disease. Warning!!! Here is where it gets tricky!! Many blood panels have false negatives, in other words, you show negative but still have celiac disease. You could also have the endoscopy and show negative but still have a problem.

Gluten Intolerance; some believe this is the precursor of celiac disease. You can't tolerate gluten but you haven't enough damage to show on the endoscopy. The problem is you still can't tolerate gluten and can't prove it except through elimination diet. Your dr has to really work with you on that. The thing is the treament for celiac disease & gluten intolerance is the same; GFD for life.

So no matter what, you need to stay gluten-free if gluten makes you sick. If you opt for more testing, keep eating gluten or you will definately test negative.

I hope this helps. It is tough to understand but you need to do your best to get it because there are many dr's out there who don't and you have to stand up for yourself with them. Get what you need to get healthy and remember that we are here for you!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,143
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Danamarie22
    Newest Member
    Danamarie22
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      no argument. Never take the pills sold for Nuclear events, except in a nuclear event when instructed to by authorities.  Some of these go up to 130 milligrams per pill. 5000 times the strength of the dietary supplement.  130 times the safe upper limit.  130 mg = 130,000 mcg. Dietary supplements like Lugol's Solution and Liquid Iodine are 50 micrograms per drop.  It takes 20 drops to reach the safe upper limit. In the US the Safe upper limit is 1100 mcg.  In Europe 600 mcg and in Japan 3000 mcg ( 3 mg).
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.