Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Digesting Vegetables... (may Be Gross)


coldnight

Recommended Posts

RiceGuy Collaborator

I've heard of people becoming sick when they move to a new country, and go off their native diet. They didn't feel well until they start eating what they used to. Genetics probably does play some role, though over the centuries, I suspect the gene pool has gotten a bit more blended up. I heard someplace, that we all have genes of every race on the planet, though obviously in relatively small amounts, and usually recessive.

I've been trying out some betaine HCL, and the only things I've noticed so far, is that I'm hungrier a little sooner, and I have a couple burps after eating.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star
I've been trying out some betaine HCL, and the only things I've noticed so far, is that I'm hungrier a little sooner, and I have a couple burps after eating.

:lol: :lol:

I'm curious if anyone has tried just lemon juice or vinegar - two old, non-pill methods of dinking with your stomach acids.

BRUMI1968 Collaborator

To the original question --

I suggest looking up insoluble fiber vs. soluble fiber. Insoluble fiber is indigestible - it is going to come out of us largely unchanged, though I suppose in some folks it might be more obvious than others. IBS sufferers (and probably everyone to a lesser degree) have trouble with insoluble fiber.

Insoluble fiber is fiber that is not soluble by water. Apple peel is a good example. I cannot eat apples much as they cause some pretty biazzarro pooping issues. Bananas are soluble.

Anyway, the reason that blending these veggies helps in digestion is because it breaks down the cellulose wall (imagine a cow chewing it's cud - only we dont do that - so the unchewed cud of these tough veggies ends up in our tummies, etc. Ouch.)

Just a thought.

coldnight Apprentice

That's a possibility, but I do eat other stuff fine. I guess my main concern was why it was making me sick, i.e. causing diarrhea. If that was not the case, it wouldn't be a problem. I take insoluble fiber, and eat other insoluble fibrous foods that don't cause the same problem. But it seems like it might make sense if there is some reason these certain foods cause me to be ill.

AliB Enthusiast

I couldn't digest fruits and veg very well at all for a long time - gradually I had to avoid the different fruits until I was pretty much down to bananas and nothing else - raw veg was also very problematic although cooked was ok.

Finally my digestion collapsed completely and I could hardly eat anything without getting some kind of reaction. I had gone gluten-free and dairy-free and although it helped with the immediate stomach pain and D, I still couldn't digest even the gluten-free carbs (carb digestion has always been a bit of a problem for me anyway).

After being told about the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) by another poster on here I have been following it for 10 months and can now tolerate a lot more foods including quite a few fruits and most veg, cooked and raw. Quite often I make a large jug of fruit and veg smoothie which I drink through the day and my digestion is more than happy with that (and my blood sugar is pretty ok with it too - I am diabetic). I do need to make sure I drink plenty of water or the fiber bungs me up, but then I have never really drunk enough anyway so that is no bad thing.

I didn't know why I was reacting to so many things and was very puzzled as to what was causing it - was it salicylates, was it tannins, was it nightshades? I am now pretty much convinced it was just because my gut was so damaged and different food particles were getting into places they shouldn't be. As it has now been finally able to heal the intolerances have gradually been receding.

Mtndog Collaborator
That's a possibility, but I do eat other stuff fine. I guess my main concern was why it was making me sick, i.e. causing diarrhea. If that was not the case, it wouldn't be a problem. I take insoluble fiber, and eat other insoluble fibrous foods that don't cause the same problem. But it seems like it might make sense if there is some reason these certain foods cause me to be ill.

Also, how long have you been gluten-free? Your system may be damaged and sensitive right now but as you heal, you may be able to eat these.

Nightshades are definitely a problem for a lot of people here.

coldnight Apprentice

A couple months, besides the times I have messed up and ate something wrong. I think it's slim odds that I have celiac disease given the genes, but flour and wheat definitely hurt in only small amounts. I'm leaning to nightshades, the common ones I avoid because they make me sick, didn't know bell peppers were one. =)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.