Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Cookies And Brownies.. Please Help If You Can..


Jamie

Recommended Posts

Jamie Contributor

I have this book called "the cookie bible"... of course I bought it a couple of months ago... before I was diagnosed.. I noticed that many of the ingredients for the cookies are gluten free except for the flour...

can I substitute gluten free flour in there and the cookies will come out almost the same?

Or will they probably be too piecy to stay together... a lot of faults in them... ect?

Same goes for brownies... can I just substitute the all purpose gluten-free flour in the brownie recipie if they other ingredients are gluten-free?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



candrews Newbie

Yes! I use Jules' Nearly Normal flour and it works as a replacement in any recipe, so it'll work for those cookies. Possibly add an extra teaspoon of xanthan gum to the cookies if the seem too thin, but I haven't had any problem. This flour tastes GREAT and the texture isn't crumbly like other gluten free cookies. My family orders it online at www.nearlynormalkitchen.com. I have tried almost every flour out there and this is by far the best. Cookies are my favorite food, so I use this flour for tollhouse chocolate chip cookies all the time.

Happy baking!!

Jamie Contributor

Do they really taste like the real thing?

And can I use this all purpose flour to make breads too? If so... how do those come out with this flour?

lobita Apprentice
Do they really taste like the real thing?

And can I use this all purpose flour to make breads too? If so... how do those come out with this flour?

Hi Jamie,

I've found in gluten-free baking that the easiest thing to mimic wheat products is cookies. Using different types of gluten-free flour might change the texture a bit (like putting a percentage of sorghum flour into a cookie will make it chewier), but I've found the taste holds up really well...sometimes even better.

Bread is, in my opinion, the hardest thing to make gluten-free. I've found the gluten-free flours make a very dense bread that doesn't rise very well, and falls very easily. gluten-free bread also requires something to hold it together, usually xantham gum and eggs. I think this is because the gluten in wheat is what makes the dough stretch and is hardy enough to stay risen. And in my opinion, I think this is also the reason why wheat is hard for a lot of people to digest (not just celiacs). Using different gluten-free flours will help in making bread because they add different qualities to the final product.

RiceGuy Collaborator

I've found that practically any flour or blend can work in cookies. It seems to be as much a matter of preference as anything else. One basic rule for gluten-free baking is to include something to bind it together - usually xanthan gum. As was stated, breads are trickier to get right, so starting with cookies is probably a good idea. However, I wouldn't ever expect a single blend to work in every recipe of every sort. Plus, not every wheat-based recipe can turn out right gluten-free, just by exchanging the flour. But when it doubt, just post the recipe, and I'm sure you'll get plenty of good suggestions on how to adjust it.

There was a thread or two with a peanut butter cookie recipe, which had only peanut butter, sugar, and an egg. Many have had good results with it.

Here's a list of gluten-free recipes:

https://www.celiac.com/categories/Gluten%252dFree-Recipes/

SevenWishes Newbie

I swear by the recipe Land O' Lakes published for gluten free chocolate chip cookies. They're every bit as good as "normal" ones, or, as someone wrote above, maybe even better. That recipe is easily found with a little Googling, so take a look! ;)

Brownies use very little flour compared to the ratio of their other ingredients, so they don't get affected as much by alternate flours as breads or cakes. There are several quite good gluten free brownie mixes out there on the market that are pretty much indistinguishable from wheat flour mixes.

As far as looking for a general rule replacement flour substitute, there is no 100% steadfast rule you can go by. Certain recipes work better with certain flours or binders, so you can't always just assume you can throw in equal amounts of x flour and some xanthan gum to replace the wheat flour. The most common replacement for wheat flour tends to be white rice flour and some xanthan, but not in every case.

It's best to search this site or Google recipes for whatever individual dish you are looking to make, or find a good gluten free cookbook that you trust and follow the recipe. I have winged it with some recipes and had fantastic results, but also have had some failures that became utterly inedible. Even the "all purpose" blends you can buy can be iffy in some cases, so don't expect things to come out completely the same or as expected...there is usually some small element of risk with baking this way.

Think of it this way...cooking is an art where a little more or less of this or that is up to personal taste and craftsmanship. With baking, however, you're pretty literally trying to make an edible chemistry experiment where heat, moisture levels, acidity, structure, and so much more have to be just so for the results to come out the way you want them to. Even with the magical structural protein of gluten, there is a fair chance things won't come out right; remove that constant and throw in other variables like flours from different plants, the hope that xanthan gum or guar gum might or might not mimic gluten the way you want it to, etc., and you have a volitile situation that might work or might not.

Good luck with the search...and when you find recipes you like, save them and guard them at all costs!

Mtndog Collaborator

I just substitute gluten-free Pantry's all-purpose flour mix. For chocolate chip cookies, I use the recipe on Pamela's pancake and baking mix and I swear by it! I'm about to make some in a few minutes. People who aren't gluten-free can't tell! The key is to soften the butter, not melt it. Yum!

The best gluten-free brownie mix I have found is gluten-free pantry's chocolate truffle brownies- even my hubby likes them and he is a brownie connosieur!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Darn210 Enthusiast

Don't throw out your new cookbook . . . you definitely can salvage most of those recipes.

Most people find a blend that they like to work with . . . I like Annalise Roberts' with fine ground brown rice flour/tapioca flour/potato starch. You'll see quite a few opinions on this website. I recommend trying one at a time and just use a process of elimination. The ones that I tried (and passed on) weren't horrible, I just lliked this one best. The key in baking something like cookies or brownies or bread is to have a combination of flours/starches. Gluten free recipes besides the xanathan gum also usually add extra baking powder and baking soda.

Here is how I convert one of my old recipes . . .

I google the gluten free version of what I'm making (or look it up in one of gluten free cookbooks) and see how much xanthan gum/baking soda/baking powder they use. Also check that you are using about the same amount of flour. . . if your recipe calls for twice as much flour as the googled recipe, then double their recommendation. Then I use my old faithful recipe and use the amounts of xanthan gum/baking soda/baking powder recommended by the recipe. Sometimes my cookies will spread a bit too much and I want to add a little more flour so I just do a "test bake" with a couple of cookies before I send a couple of pans into the oven and end up with a bunch of flat cookies.

Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

Janet, thanks for the advice to add more flour to flat cookies. I'd never thought of that and figured the cookie recipe just wouldn't work. I'll try a few of my recipes again.

When I first went gluten-free I didn't have all this great information at my finger tips. I just found a flour blend I liked and tried my old recipes. I use Pamela's pancake and baking mix. Haven't tried the others since I like the taste of Pamela's.

I think the hardest part is figuring out what's gluten free and what isn't. This board has helped a lot. Thanks to everyone on here!

Darn210 Enthusiast
Janet, thanks for the advice to add more flour to flat cookies. I'd never thought of that and figured the cookie recipe just wouldn't work. I'll try a few of my recipes again.

When I first went gluten-free I didn't have all this great information at my finger tips. I just found a flour blend I liked and tried my old recipes. I use Pamela's pancake and baking mix. Haven't tried the others since I like the taste of Pamela's.

I think the hardest part is figuring out what's gluten free and what isn't. This board has helped a lot. Thanks to everyone on here!

Ooooooh . . . a couple more things:

First, some people will refrigerate their dough instead of adding more flour . . . I've had success with adding more flour so that's what I do.

Second, I love Pamela's also and do use it but usually not exclusively as my substitution in a recipe . . . However, plenty of people do. The nice thing is - it already has baking powder, baking soda and xanthan gum in it. It also has the almond flour . . . the almond flour (ground almonds) will add additional "fat" to the recipe . . . this causes the cookies to spread also. It says on the bottom of the bag that if you have too much spread, try cutting the fat component of your recipe (butter or shortening) by 1/2.

lobita Apprentice
Think of it this way...cooking is an art where a little more or less of this or that is up to personal taste and craftsmanship. With baking, however, you're pretty literally trying to make an edible chemistry experiment where heat, moisture levels, acidity, structure, and so much more have to be just so for the results to come out the way you want them to. Even with the magical structural protein of gluten, there is a fair chance things won't come out right; remove that constant and throw in other variables like flours from different plants, the hope that xanthan gum or guar gum might or might not mimic gluten the way you want it to, etc., and you have a volitile situation that might work or might not.

I totally love this summary! It's the gluten-free bread that's killing me. EVERY time it comes out different, whether I change the recipe or not.

And Darn210, I do the refrigerating thing to my chocolate chip cookie dough, I've found that it does, indeed, make a cakeier cookie. But my mom did it to her molasses cookies and the process made them very thin and crispy. Weird, huh? That's a good idea about doing a sample run with the batter first, though.

SevenWishes Newbie
I totally love this summary! It's the gluten-free bread that's killing me. EVERY time it comes out different, whether I change the recipe or not.

My mental approach to baking is pretty much based on the philosophy and science of Alton Brown's show and books. And I do think it really is true, and why some people happen to be great cooks, but don't necessarily become good at baking, or even vice versa. Yes, both situations involve food, but cooking is harder to mess up and more open to interpretation. Baking involves a lot more actual chemistry where proportions and ingredients and moisture and all the rest pretty much need to be just so for things to come out right. ;)

ang1e0251 Contributor

I confess I haven't baked chocolate chip cookies since going gluten-free. Weird 'cause they're one of my all time faves. Actually I've exclusively eaten the PB cookies someone else mentioned. Very easy to make and satisfying. I never really liked PB cookies before this recipe which I tried for my celiac friend. I've been making them ever since. They use PB, baking soda, salt, vanilla and sugar. The recipe I found in a cookbook for picky eaters and it's called "The Best Peanut Butter Cookies, I Swear!"

With that recipe I would suggest you sprinkle a little sugar over the top of each cookie before baking. Leave them sitting on the cookie sheet for about 10 minutes after you remove them from the oven or they will fall apart. They freeze well too.

Back to chocolate chip, even though I haven't made them this year, I can tell you the tips I learned from before. I found the recipe that tasted the best was from my Betty Crocker cookbook. It had a note after the recipe that said "for a cakier cookie, add 1/3 cup flour to the recipe." I always made them this way and had many compliments. The other trick to cookies is to divide the amount of butter. I was always taught to never use more than 1/2 butter in the recipe. Always use the other half as shortening. Many cooking sites have questions from bakers that ask why their cookies brown too fast or come out flat. Butter has a lower melting temp than shortening and will brown quickly. Using 1/2 butter-1/2 shortening will help this problem. Also cream your shortening/butter into the sugar very well. I read once this has something to do with the chemical reaction in the baking. I don't remember exactly what it said, but it does make a great cookie!

Hope this helps. Happy baking!!

Darn210 Enthusiast
The other trick to cookies is to divide the amount of butter. I was always taught to never use more than 1/2 butter in the recipe. Always use the other half as shortening. Many cooking sites have questions from bakers that ask why their cookies brown too fast or come out flat. Butter has a lower melting temp than shortening and will brown quickly. Using 1/2 butter-1/2 shortening will help this problem.

That's a great tip to share . . . I've always done that (although I use 3/4 butter, 1/4 shortening) and I do/did it because otherwise my cookies spread too much (even before gluten-free baking). Funny how you do somethings without even thinking anymore about why you are doing them.

Maddie's mom Newbie
Yes! I use Jules' Nearly Normal flour and it works as a replacement in any recipe, so it'll work for those cookies. Possibly add an extra teaspoon of xanthan gum to the cookies if the seem too thin, but I haven't had any problem. This flour tastes GREAT and the texture isn't crumbly like other gluten free cookies. My family orders it online at www.nearlynormalkitchen.com. I have tried almost every flour out there and this is by far the best. Cookies are my favorite food, so I use this flour for tollhouse chocolate chip cookies all the time.

Happy baking!!

I agree that this is the best all-purpose flour mix I have used so far! I have made many "regular" recipes (bananna bread, sugar cookies, Christmas cookies, breading for chicken nuggets, ect.) using this flour - cup for cup - and it has worked great! I used to be so frustrated trying to get the ratio of all the different flours correct and it is so nice to have 1 flour mix that I can use! The Nearly Normal graham cracker mix is also very good!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,982
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amanda Jeanne
    Newest Member
    Amanda Jeanne
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for the reply! Doctors over the years have tested me for everything under the sun and tests are normal, except the decreasing bone density, high FSH (in regards to infertility), lower iron, and all the other celiac symptoms I experience. When I was 15 the infertility started (my whole life growing up I always ate gluten, and always had severe stomach problems, I’m an adult now and I still remember the stomach pain as a child) and then from here, they couldn’t figure out why. At the same time I was having all these celiac symptoms but nobody ever put two and two together.   Eventually in adulthood I went off gluten and dairy and felt better. Later in life, the topic was brought up by doctors, but they could never actually test for celiac because I was off gluten for years.   Just recently multiple doctors brought it up again, and said I should rule it out. So the ruling out of celiac, which is direct correlation with these symptoms, infertility at a younge age, on the edge and getting into osteopenia, etc. etc. is the concern. I was off of dairy for the same time as gluten because it made me sick. I did not surely have adequate calcium/D intake as well over these years.   The matter of concern is to once and for all get celiac ruled out for my own health, a gastro doctor recommended I get it done and other doctors to confirm yes or no to officially rule it out.  For these 6 weeks I have not been eating enough gluten then it seems, if 2-3 slices of bread a day is not really enough. I should increase my intake of gluten then and extend the test time?   Thank you very much for your help!!
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @WildFlower1! The reason you are seeing conflicting results when you research the length of time recommended for doing the "gluten challenge" is that the guidelines have recently been under revision. So there are two components: 1. amount of daily gluten consumption and 2. duration of that amount of daily gluten consumption Recently, the guidelines have been under revision because the medical community was sensing the previous standards were too relaxed, particularly in the daily amount of recommended gluten consumption. The more recent guidelines seem to be calling for higher amounts of daily gluten consumption over (perhaps) as shorter period of time. So, it is becoming a daily minimum of 10g of gluten daily (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks. Personally, I would recommend that amount of consumption be extended from two weeks to four weeks to ensure valid testing. Your Immunoglobulin IgA at 1.25. Was that within normal range? If that one is low, you are IgA deficient and other IgA test results cannot be trusted. But regardless of whether or not you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) the antidote is the same, namely, a gluten free diet. What would you do different if you had a more confident differential diagnosis? And there are other reasons for the development of osteopenia/osteoporosis that you probably should explore. Are you on any serious supplementation for D3 and magnesium?
    • WildFlower1
      The results of my blood tests after 4 weeks: *Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA —->   “<0.5 NEGATIVE” *Immunoglobulin IgA —-> “1.25” *Deamidated Gliadin peptide Ab IgG —-> “<0.5 NEGATIVE”    
    • WildFlower1
      Hi there, I have been scouring the forums, medical journals, celiac websites, speaking to my doctor and there seems to be a contradiction in the exact amount of time one must do the gluten challenge for a blood test. Let me please express my gratitude for taking your time to help! I will try and keep this short. In a nutshell, I am positive genetically for celiac. Previously for many years 10+ I have been on a strict gluten free diet. At a very young age, I had infertility, hair loss, low iron, stomach problems, neurological symptoms, continued low bone density etc. etc. all the symptoms that line up with celiac.  I could never get an “official diagnosis” because I was not eating gluten for years.   Recently, I had a bone density scan, and was shocked at the results. I am young and my low bone density is continuously lowering. This lead me  to seriously consider doing the celiac blood test to confirm if I actually have celiac. Years ago, I had an endoscopy and they did a biopsy saying it was negative for celiac - but I had been on a gluten free diet for years. Now, I asked my doctor if I can start the gluten challenge and get this over with. My doctor said two weeks then get the blood test. I have been having 2-3 pieces of bread daily. After four weeks of doing this, I went for the bloodwork - it came back negative for celiac. I am continuing to eat bread daily, it has now been over 6 weeks. I am not able to get an endoscopy. Please, from your experience how long really must I eat bread daily to ensure I do not get a false negative blood test for celiac? I have read up to 12 weeks. One doctor advised this is foolish to even do this gluten challenge as I am damaging my body. My other doctor said 2 weeks eat it, but it showed negative. But with my recent continuous lowering of bone density I personally need to rule celiac out.   Thank you VERY much for your help, I truly appreciate it!!
    • Soleihey
×
×
  • Create New...