Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Sensitivity


Guest A.L.-ergic77

Recommended Posts

Guest A.L.-ergic77

I'm new to this gluten diet (even though I've had celiac my whole life). I've been reading as many posts as possible. I am getting confused on one thing though, the different sensitivities people have toward gluten. I don't understand how some people are writing that a certain product doesn't bother them even though it was manufactured on equipment shared with foods that contain gluten. Or that only super sensitive people should be careful of certain products.

I guess what I'm saying is that aren't the super sensitive people the ones to go by. Because they are affected by even the smallest bits of gluten they come into contact with. I know that really nothing bothers me when i eat it, but I know I'm still allergic to it. Even the smallest particles of gluten that people come into contact with are affecting them whether they know it or not. Getting sick shouldn't be the way of judging whether you've been gluttened or not.

I guess I'm just confused about this. Do certain amounts of gluten not affect people (inside) the same way as others. Without the conflict of getting sick or not, doesn't any amount of gluten hurt all celiacs in the same way?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



brigala Explorer
Without the conflict of getting sick or not, doesn't any amount of gluten hurt all celiacs in the same way?

That's a good question. I am not sure I have a definitive answer.

I know that if I accidentally eat a small quantity of gluten (like once I was making pasta for my family and forgot I shouldn't eat a noodle to see if it was done), I don't usually have any symptoms UNLESS I then go and drink milk. I don't take that to mean that I should just eat things with small amounts of wheat in them and avoid milk afterward so I don't feel the damage. I know that the symptoms I get from milk are the result of damage caused by the gluten. I don't want to do the damage in the first place.

I won't have any symptoms if I accidentally eat something that contains a small amount of barley flavor or something. But I avoid those things anyway, based on the knowledge that I am probably doing damage whether I feel it or not.

Oats are a little different. I have, in the past (early in my gluten-free days), eaten regular non-gluten-free oatmeal and not had any symptoms. They have done controlled studies where they have done biopsies on Celiacs eating oats and Celiacs not eating oats. They find that for almost all of them, the biopsies show that oats do not do any damage. (The oats they used in the study were gluten-free oats). Even though I have not reacted to them, because I know oats are often contaminated, I now won't eat oatmeal or granola bars and such unless they're certified gluten-free. But there is supposed to be a threshold (which is probably different for different Celiacs) of gluten which can be tolerated. So, since I know I can eat oats without symptoms (even in fairly substantial servings), I am confident that OATS aren't a problem for me, but contamination of oats might be (whether I feel it or not). If there's something I want to eat that has (not gluten-free-certified) oats in the ingredient list, as long as it's not in the first few ingredients, I will allow myself to have a bite or two. My thinking is that the risk of significant contamination is pretty low. Am I right? I don't really know.

Usually, items manufactured in the same facility as wheat-based products have a pretty low level of potential contamination. Many manufacturers these days do a pretty good job of cleaning equipment between runs. The tiny quantities of gluten which may cross-contaminate are usually pretty small. From what I understand, most Celiacs probably can tolerate limited amounts of cross-contamination without doing damage to their systems. Some Celiacs will have symptoms and/or test positive for gluten antibodies even when the amount of gluten they have ingested is extremely minute. These people probably need to be even more careful, and may avoid foods which have ever been in the same vicinity as wheat.

I try to find out a little about manufacturing practices before making a decision. My local pizza place said they'd be happy to put pizza toppings in a container for me when I order a pizza for the kids, so I can bring them home and put them on my own crust. But I declined the offer... too much flour flying around the place for me to feel comfortable eating anything out of there. Trader Joe's has a manufacturing policy statement on their website that I am very comfortable with, and I don't worry at all about eating Trader Joe's brand foods even if they are manufactured in facilities that process gluten-containing ingredients. I avoid most generics because I know they often get ingredients from a variety of suppliers, and some may be better than others about cross-contamination of allergens. I try to stick with brands that have statements available concerning cross-contamination potential. So it's all case-by-case.

And... 90% of what I cook now is made from SCRATCH. We even grow most of our own meat here (I raise sheep) or trade with other farms for animals on the hoof. That way I know where they're butchered, processed, and wrapped. So the limited amount of food that I get from pre-packaged sources (I hope) shouldn't put too much cross-contaminated gluten into my diet.

So... that's my very non-expert understanding of the situation. I don't know whether it really helps or not.

-Elizabeth

dilettantesteph Collaborator

I was at the GI recently and we discussed that. They said that they think that some are more sensitive than others to small amounts, but they don't know for sure. It may be that some are just more symptomatic. Maybe the sensitive people are like the canary in the coal mine. You could go crazy trying to keep every tiny bit of gluten out of your diet. It seems easiest only to worry if you have symptoms.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Barbara 1981
    Newest Member
    Barbara 1981
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Given your history of a high TTG (167) that decreased to 16 on a gluten-free diet, along with genetic confirmation of celiac disease, it’s likely the negative biopsy is a false negative due to not eating gluten before the endoscopy. Gluten is necessary to trigger the intestinal damage seen in celiac disease, and avoiding it can lead to healing and a normal biopsy despite ongoing immune activity (reflected in your still-elevated TTG). The inflammation observed during the endoscopy (“diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa”) could be residual damage, mild ongoing inflammation, or another condition like peptic duodenitis, but it’s consistent with celiac disease in context. Continued positive blood markers suggest ongoing gluten exposure, possibly from cross-contamination or hidden sources. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet and follow-up testing are key to managing symptoms and reducing inflammation. Discuss these findings with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis and refine your dietary approach. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, it sounds like great progress, but what was the time frame between the two endoscopies? 
    • Scott Adams
      Your symptoms—headaches, dizziness, nausea, irregular bowel movements, anemia, and menstrual changes—along with a family history of celiac disease, strongly suggest celiac disease could be the cause. The mild duodenal changes seen in your biopsy are consistent with early or mild celiac disease, though they could also be due to other factors. The improvement in bowel movements after cutting out gluten is a positive sign, but other symptoms like headaches and dizziness may take longer to resolve as your body heals. It’s important to continue a strict gluten-free diet and discuss further testing, such as celiac antibody blood tests or a follow-up biopsy, with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis. Many people experience a gradual improvement in symptoms over weeks to months, so patience and strict adherence to the diet are key. You’re not alone in this process, and support from celiac communities can be very helpful. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      For people with celiac disease and corn intolerance, most salts, including table salt with dextrose, are generally safe in small amounts, as the dextrose is typically highly processed and unlikely to contain problematic corn proteins. However, if you’re highly sensitive, you might consider switching to pure kosher or Himalayan salt, which don’t contain additives. While bringing your own salt to restaurants or avoiding seasoned foods can feel overwhelming, it’s a practical step if you’re concerned. Many people with corn intolerance tolerate trace amounts of dextrose in salt without issues, but individual sensitivity varies. If your current salt isn’t causing symptoms, it’s likely fine to continue using it, especially given your financial constraints and the challenges of managing dietary restrictions. Focus on what works for you and prioritize avoiding larger sources of corn, like cornstarch.
    • Scott Adams
      Your daughter’s ongoing stomach pains two weeks into a gluten-free diet could be due to her body still healing after months of gluten exposure, as recovery from celiac disease can take time. Her inconsistent eating habits and possible eating disorder behaviors may also delay healing. While she’s now eating gluten-free snacks, her limited intake and emotional withdrawal complicate the process. It’s positive that she’s trying, but recovery may take weeks to months. Addressing her depression and mental health is crucial, as celiac disease can impact mood, and proper nutrition may help. Patience and support are key, but if symptoms persist, consult her doctor to rule out accidental gluten exposure or other issues. Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal.  
×
×
  • Create New...