Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Here With Questions


Forensicmom

Recommended Posts

Forensicmom Newbie

I have had digestive issues for a few years and my dr's have tried different things. None of them considered Celiac's until I asked about it. They did the traditional blood test, which was negative. They also took a few biopsies during an upper endoscopy a few weeks ago that came back negative as well. I mentioned to my doctor that when I'm feeling bad (with the nausea) that the only thing that makes me stomach feel better (most of the time) is crackers, bread, etc. She said that that's a clear indicator that gluten is NOT the problem. She said that if it was, then I would react to it, not feel better.

Well, I've read on a few websites that gluten doesn't react right away and can take 24 hours or more, which is why it's hard to diagnose. They said that it initially makes you feel better but it's a delayed reaction.

Can anyone tell me if this is true? I also read that there are NO accurate tests for this and that the ONLY way to know for sure is to go TOTALLY gluten free for at least 3 months.

I do not want to try a drastic diet if I'm not even sure that gluten is the problem. It's very confusing, which is made worse since I'm getting opposite information then what my doctor is telling me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor
I have had digestive issues for a few years and my dr's have tried different things. None of them considered Celiac's until I asked about it. They did the traditional blood test, which was negative. They also took a few biopsies during an upper endoscopy a few weeks ago that came back negative as well. I mentioned to my doctor that when I'm feeling bad (with the nausea) that the only thing that makes me stomach feel better (most of the time) is crackers, bread, etc. She said that that's a clear indicator that gluten is NOT the problem. She said that if it was, then I would react to it, not feel better.

Well, I've read on a few websites that gluten doesn't react right away and can take 24 hours or more, which is why it's hard to diagnose. They said that it initially makes you feel better but it's a delayed reaction.

Can anyone tell me if this is true? I also read that there are NO accurate tests for this and that the ONLY way to know for sure is to go TOTALLY gluten free for at least 3 months.

I do not want to try a drastic diet if I'm not even sure that gluten is the problem. It's very confusing, which is made worse since I'm getting opposite information then what my doctor is telling me.

Yes, it is true that the available diagnostic means is not as accurate as we would like at this time. There can be false negatives with the blood test as well as the endoscopy/biopsy exams. Not all roads lead to Celiac, but it's wise to be tested due to years of digestive issues.

Reaction time can vary from person to person. But, it's more common for a reations to be delayed (such as 24 hours) when a person has been on the diet for some time and some healing has taken place.

Can you post the blood test that you were given

I would suggest a trial diet. Try it for several weeks and be as accurate as possible. You can then introduce gluten and check your reaction.

Mike M Rookie
Well, I've read on a few websites that gluten doesn't react right away and can take 24 hours or more, which is why it's hard to diagnose. They said that it initially makes you feel better but it's a delayed reaction.

Can anyone tell me if this is true?

I agree with Momma Goose's response. May be time for a "trial" gluten free diet. Also, in my opinion, you are a prime candidate for having a stool analysis for gluten intolerance done. A company that is called Enterolab does this. Some posters on here are not fans of Enterolab. I do believe they can help in many cases, especially like your situation. As far as making you feel better after eating gluten? This was how it was for me in the very end before being diagnosed. Sometimes I would be so sick I could not eat for 3 or 4 days at a time. When I finally would eat something, the only thing I wanted was regular (wheat) spaghetti with ketchup on it (gross huh?) and I felt much better for a day or so and then back to sick.....It was a vicious cycle. Hope this helps, All the best, Mike

Forensicmom Newbie

Thanks so much for responding. Digestive issues can be a very frustrating thing and it's nice to have other people to talk to about this.

My only blood test for Celiac's was done (1-16-09) and it says:

IGA, serum 212

Gliadin AB (IGA) >3

Tissue Transgluta,minase AB IGA >3

I have NO idea what that means but the dr told me they were normal. The biopsy results were also normal, according to the GI doctor, but I haven't seen the actual results. The only things that showed up in my blood that weren't in the normal range were: Ferritin 7, Hemoglobin 11.2, Hematocrit 32.6

I started taking Nexium 2 weeks ago. Can anyone tell me whether I should give this a few more weeks to see if it works or should I just start watching the gluten now? I'm afraid to try too many things at once and then not be able to tell whether it's the lack of gluten or the acid meds that are working.

Going gluten free scares me a bunch since there's gluten in just about everything and the thought of giving up all my favorite foods and drinks is not appealing to me, although I do want to feel better. Is there any easy way to do a trial diet?

How do you deal with gluten when you go out? What about parties, functions, etc? Are you able to eat out?

Oh, I have heard about the Enterolab tab from another site but have heard that it's pretty expensive and most doctor's won't send you for it. Would it still be necessary if you go on the diet instead?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,394
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shannon S.
    Newest Member
    Shannon S.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Hope you're feeling better.   I use a combination of Thiamine, Cobalamine, and Pyridoxine (Vitamins B 1, B12, and B6) for pain relief.  Together these vitamins together have pain killing effects (analgesic).  They are water soluble, so the body can easily excrete any excess.  They are safe to take.   Hope this helps.   Mechanisms of action of vitamin B1 (thiamine), B6 (pyridoxine), and B12 (cobalamin) in pain: a narrative review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35156556/
    • trents
      I did some research on what exactly is gluten . . . what defines it.  "The term gluten usually refers to the elastic network of a wheat grain's proteins, gliadin and glutenin primarily . . . " "The types of grains that contain gluten include all species of wheat (common wheat, durum, spelt, khorasan, emmer and einkorn), and barley, rye, and some cultivars of oat" (emphasis mine) "The storage proteins in other grains, such as maize (zeins) and rice (rice protein), are sometimes called gluten, but they do not cause harmful effects in people with celiac disease." (emphasis mine) From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluten What I found most interesting is that some cultivars of oats contain gluten. Could this explain, in part at least, the controversy surrounding oats? I mean, depending on the source, it could indeed sometimes include gluten and cause a celiac reaction.
    • Scott Adams
      Your point about the limitations of current testing is valid, but the idea of "molecular mimicry" with rice and corn glutens is less clear. While corn contains zein, which can trigger reactions in some celiac patients, rice is generally considered safe and lacks proteins structurally similar to gluten. The term "molecular mimicry" is often overused and not well-supported in the context of all grains. While your experience with corn is noteworthy, extending this to all grains, including rice, may not be scientifically justified. Testing and research should indeed improve, but claims about all grains causing similar reactions need more evidence.
    • trents
      I think Scott speaks truth. And I think there is more to this than the prospect of her having celiac disease. If it wasn't this issue, I'm betting it would be another. 
    • Scott Adams
      So one does need a specific inherited gene in order to develop celiac disease, so in some way I suppose anyone with celiac disease could take the negative approach of blaming their parents for getting it, however, it also takes some other environmental trigger, such as a specific virus or other factor, and this part is not necessarily caused by the parents. Around 40% of people have the genes to get celiac disease, but only around 1% actually get it.  In any case, we could all go through life complaining about all sorts of different wrongs supposedly caused by our parents, however, it's probably a lot more healthy for everyone to try to deal with life in a more positive way and instead move forward. For most people it's probably far more important to maintain positive family relationships in life than it is to try to attach blame to family members for getting any disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...