Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Liver Biopsy


ranger

Recommended Posts

ranger Enthusiast

Last Oct., my doc did a needle biopsy on my liver. When the procedure was over, he informed me that he cound't find my liver and that he would have to perform a surgical biopsy at a later date. Being under anastesia, I just said whatever. He never mentioned it again and ,by this time I was so sick of being poked and prodded, niether did I. I did wonder why if it was so neccesary to perform one biopsy, why did another one become unnessesary? Months went by and I decided to get a complete copy of my medical report. I was shocked, but maybe this is common. One line reads:LIVER BIOPSY,ATTEMTED PERCUTANEOUS BX, QUESTION TISSUE? A following line reads: DIAGNOSIS- PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY TISSUE.. LUNG TISSUE IDENTIFIED. Can someone please tell me it ain't so? Susan


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

GET A DIFFERENT DOCTOR!

Lungs and livers aren't so close in the body that you need to damage one in order to get the other.

Roda Rising Star
Last Oct., my doc did a needle biopsy on my liver. When the procedure was over, he informed me that he cound't find my liver and that he would have to perform a surgical biopsy at a later date. Being under anastesia, I just said whatever. He never mentioned it again and ,by this time I was so sick of being poked and prodded, niether did I. I did wonder why if it was so neccesary to perform one biopsy, why did another one become unnessesary? Months went by and I decided to get a complete copy of my medical report. I was shocked, but maybe this is common. One line reads:LIVER BIOPSY,ATTEMTED PERCUTANEOUS BX, QUESTION TISSUE? A following line reads: DIAGNOSIS- PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY TISSUE.. LUNG TISSUE IDENTIFIED. Can someone please tell me it ain't so? Susan

I am not giving any medical advice but I am just curious, was your percutaneous bx performed by your regular doctor or by a radiologist specialized in doing these procedures? I ask because I have assisted radiologists with percutaneous bx before under computed tomography(CT). We take images of the area of intrest to biopsy and the radiologist selects the area to go in based on the preliminary images. They then take the samples and when done another set of images is taken. For lung and liver biopsies is is routine to take a chest x-ray an hour after the procedure. The reason is that you can puncture the lung. Of course if you were doing a lung bx the risk is higher, but it is a risk of a liver biopsy also. The liver lies just under the right hemidiphragm and if the area of interest is high in the liver it can be a risk. I know some biopsies can be done under ultrasound also. It just depends what they are needing to take samples of and which is the best way to visualize it (CT or US). I hope this information helps.

ranger Enthusiast
I am not giving any medical advice but I am just curious, was your percutaneous bx performed by your regular doctor or by a radiologist specialized in doing these procedures? I ask because I have assisted radiologists with percutaneous bx before under computed tomography(CT). We take images of the area of intrest to biopsy and the radiologist selects the area to go in based on the preliminary images. They then take the samples and when done another set of images is taken. For lung and liver biopsies is is routine to take a chest x-ray an hour after the procedure. The reason is that you can puncture the lung. Of course if you were doing a lung bx the risk is higher, but it is a risk of a liver biopsy also. The liver lies just under the right hemidiphragm and if the area of interest is high in the liver it can be a risk. I know some biopsies can be done under ultrasound also. It just depends what they are needing to take samples of and which is the best way to visualize it (CT or US). I hope this information helps.

Thanks for the info. Procedure done by G.I., using ultrasound. Previously both ultra sound and cat scan used. Next day,I started coughing up bloody mucous and had to go for a chest x-ray, which turned out OK, but the whole thing scared me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,791
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeckiM
    Newest Member
    BeckiM
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Katya773
      Hi thank you so much for your input. It’s been very difficult to navigate this whole Celiac thing with everything that’s happened. What you said makes sense. I  have a better understanding of how my doctors NP was able to give me a diagnosis.  Yes I agree that staying gluten-free is best, I’ve been doing some research and it seems like DQ 2.5 homozygous does make folks extra sensitive to gluten even without a celiac diagnosis. My new gastroenterologist put me in touch with a nutritionist but I’ll have to inquire if they specialize in Celiac. Appreciate the advice 🙏🏼 
    • trents
      Okay, then. It definitely looks like TTG-IGA to me and your score far exceeds the 10x or greater that is becoming the new standard for official celiac disease diagnosis criteria without biopsy.  Talk to your physician about this.  
    • Pinkdoglady
      Thank you the reference range was 0.1 to 3.9
    • trents
      Do you have a reference range for the Serum Tissue Transglutimate? Different labs used different reference ranges so just giving the raw score of >100 is necessarily helpful. And the terminology they employed for that one is unusual. So, I'm not sure if they are referring to what we call "total IGA" or what we abbreviate normally as TTG-IGA? I think it is the latter and the "greater than" symbol suggests it exceeded the scale they were using. If I'm correct in this assumption, that is a very strong indicator of celiac disease and may qualify you for an official diagnosis without an endoscopy/biopsy. It is becoming increasingly common in Europe and the UK to declare an official diagnosis of celiac disease when the TTG-IGA score is 10x normal or greater. But that aside, your endomysial antibody IGA is positive and that is the most accurate test available for celiac disease. It's a more expensive test to run and isn't run as often as it used to be. It has largely been replaced with the TTG-IGA. There is no question in my mind that you have celiac disease. You might want to confer with your physician for greater clarity as well as options.  
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @alannahP! Excellent question but I don't know that I have ever seen any TTG-IGA score be "0". But then again, I only see TTG-IGA scores of people who have celiac disease. It would be interesting to know if people who don't have celiac disease would necessarily have a "0" TTG-IGA score or if a very low TTG-IGA score is normal for non celiacs. In other words, is a little TTG-IGA antibody count normal as part of the total IGA antibody immune spectrum? We also know that elevated TTG-IGA scores can be caused by some other health issues since it is less than 100% specific. I would be careful here not to obsess over this.
×
×
  • Create New...