Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are There Term Limits For Moderators?


Mike M

Recommended Posts

Mike M Rookie

Was wondering if there is some sort of term limit for moderators? I really think there needs to be a review of some kind in place. I have read more than once what some moderators post and it is just pure bogus information that just destroys the thread. Mike M


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikki-uk Enthusiast
I have read more than once what some moderators post and it is just pure bogus information that just destroys the thread. Mike M

Could you be more specific?? :unsure:

Tim-n-VA Contributor

Moderators are volunteers who help keep the board on topic. My guess is that getting unpaid volunteers is difficult. To the extent we like the board to stay on topic, we should be appreciative of their uncompensated work.

Beyond board functionality and rules, moderator comments about celiac are no more and no less valid than anyone else.

Jestgar Rising Star
Was wondering if there is some sort of term limit for moderators? I really think there needs to be a review of some kind in place. I have read more than once what some moderators post and it is just pure bogus information that just destroys the thread. Mike M

Please do be specific. As Tim said, we're just people and do make mistakes. If something is bogus, let us know.

Mike M Rookie
Please do be specific. As Tim said, we're just people and do make mistakes. If something is bogus, let us know.
Thanks for the response's. I should have just PM'd the particular moderator. I will do this in the future. All the best, Mike
MaryJones2 Enthusiast

And as always, if you have any issues with a moderator please discuss your concerns with Scott directly. As Tim said we are all volunteers here and devote a considerable amount of time ensuring this board runs efficiently and provides the best information possible.

happygirl Collaborator
I have read more than once what some moderators post and it is just pure bogus information that just destroys the thread.

Replace "moderators" with members and I'm sure someone will agree that every post has, by someone's definition, 'bogus' information.

"Bogus information" is obviously, in many cases, subjective.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mike M Rookie
Replace "moderators" with members and I'm sure someone will agree that every post has, by someone's definition, 'bogus' information.

"Bogus information" is obviously, in many cases, subjective.

Absolutely could not agree more.

This is what I am talking about. I was under the impression that a big responsibility of moderators was to provide facts and not purposefully create dissent amongst posters. We have one particular moderator that seems to thrive on playing the devils advocate roll. It is very frustrating and I am sure this is why other members just refrain from posting period in order to avoid confrontation. There seems to be this "us against them attitude". Mike

cruelshoes Enthusiast
We have one particular moderator that seems to thrive on playing the devils advocate roll. It is very frustrating and I am sure this is why other members just refrain from posting period in order to avoid confrontation.

Actually, that stuff happens from regular members all the time on this forum, and that is why I go so long between posts. It has less to do with moderators. If you have a problem with a particular member of the forum, add them to your ignore list. Choose My controls

Jestgar Rising Star
Actually, that stuff happens from regular members all the time on this forum, and that is why I go so long between posts. It has less to do with moderators. If you have a problem with a particular member of the forum, add them to your ignore list. Choose My controls
lizard00 Enthusiast
Moderators are just people, and are members like everyone else. They give of their time to keep threads on topic and keep spam out. I am thankful to them for their service. Their advice is based on their experience, and does not carry any more or less weight than any other member.

I felt that since this was worded so nicely, it was worth repeating.

Thank you :)

We are members here just like everyone else; doing our best to manage our health and learning as much as we can.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Hi Everyone,

In my opinion the moderators here do an amazing job...but I am biased. Their job is simply to help make sure our members follow the rules, and that's it. They are all just regular board members who have volunteered to help out. If you feel you want to contribute to the board in this way, please let me know.

If anyone has a specific issue that they need to discuss about any board member--moderator or not, please feel free to PM me about it--I do take all complaints seriously, however, you need to be very specific if you do this--provide me with links to back up any claims you make about them. Broad generalizations and accusations without specifics to back them up are not welcome.

Take care,

Scott

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    2. - MI-Hoosier replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    3. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    4. - MI-Hoosier posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    5. - Sunshine4 replied to Sunshine4's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Neurologic symptoms - Muscle Twitching and Hand Tremors


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,253
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MI-Hoosier
    Newest Member
    MI-Hoosier
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      To put this in perspective, most recent pretest "gluten challenge" guidelines for those having already been eating reduced gluten or gluten free for a significant time period is the daily consumption of 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks leading up to the day of testing (antibody or biopsy). And I would certainly give it more than two weeks to ensure a valid test experience. Short answer: If it were me, yes, I would assume I have celiac disease and launch full bore into gluten-free eating. I think the tTG-IGA is reliable enough and your score is solid enough to make that a reasonable conclusion. Here is an article to help you get off to a good start. It's easy to achieve a reduced gluten free state but much more difficult to achieve consistency in truly gluten-free eating. Gluten is hidden in so many ways and found in so many food products where you would never expect to find it. For example, soy sauce and canned tomato soup (most canned soups, actually), pills, medications, health supplements. It can be disguised in terminology. And then there is the whole issue of cross contamination where foods that are naturally gluten free become contaminated with gluten incidentally in agricultural activities and manufacturing processes: Eating out at restaurants is a mine field for those with celiac disease because you don't know how food is handled back in the kitchen. Gluten free noodles boiled in the same water that was used for wheat noodles, eggs cooked on the same griddle that French toast was, etc.  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Thank you for the response and article. I was placed on the Mediterranean diet and been on that now for about 3 weeks. While not gluten free I am eating very little bread or anything with gluten ie a slice of whole wheat bread every couple days so assume that would cause issues now with a biopsy.  With the condition my liver is in I am unsure moving back to higher bread consumption is ideal.  In this scenario would my test results be enough to assume positive Celiac and just move forward gluten free?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @MI-Hoosier! You are operating on a misconception about your "mixed" test results. You only had two celiac disease diagnostic tests run out of six that could have been ordered if your doctor had opted for a complete celiac panel. It is perfectly normal to not test positive for all possible celiac disease diagnostic tests. That is why there is more than one test option. It is the same way with other diagnostic testing procedures for many or most other diseases. Generally, when diagnosing a condition, a number of different tests are run and a diagnosis is arrived at by looking at the total body of evidence. The tTG-IGA test is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing and the one most commonly ordered by doctors. You were strongly positive for that test. It was not an unequivocal result, IMO.  Having said that, it is standard procedure to confirm a positive celiac disease blood antibody test result with an endoscopy/biopsy which is still considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. Had your tTG-IGA been 150 or greater, your doctor many have opted out of the endoscopy/biopsy. The absence of GI distress in the celiac disease population is very common. We call them "silent celiacs". That can change as damage to the lining of the small bowel worsens. Elevated liver enzymes/liver stress is very common in the celiac population. About 18% of celiacs experience it. I was one of them. Persistently elevated liver enzymes over a period of years in the absence of other typical causes such as hepatitis and alcohol abuse was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But it took thirteen years to get that figured out. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes were back into normal range. Thank goodness, there is more awareness these days about the many long fingers of celiac disease that are not found in the classic category of GI distress. Today, there have been over 200 symptoms/medical conditions identified as connected to celiac disease. It is critical that you not begin a gluten free diet until your endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is over. Doing so before that procedure will invalidate it because it will allow healing of the small bowel lining to begin. Here is a link to an article covering celiac disease blood antibody testing:  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Hi,  I was recently diagnosed with stage 3 NASH and doctor is concerned something is caused my disease to progress quicker than they would expect.   During blood tests a celiac screen was pulled as my mom is a celiac. My ttg was a 49.4 (normal >15) but my endomysial antibody was negative. I have never had gluten symptoms and no issues with bread and am 54. Do I need a biopsy to rule celiac in or out with this mixed test? Any thoughts are appreciated.  
    • Sunshine4
      Many apologies for somehow changing your first name Scott! 
×
×
  • Create New...