Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Elevated Ttg Iga Post 6 Months On Diet


Grace Maureen

Recommended Posts

Grace Maureen Rookie

I was diagnosed with Celiac Sprue in late August of 2008 (via blood tests and endoscopy). My diagnostic TTG IgA test was leveled at 157. I was just retested and now my level is 65. So, my doctor told me that I must be doing a good job with my gluten-free diet as my number has clearly dropped, but everything that i have read has said that it should be at a negative level....So...am I doing things right? Shouldn't my test be negative by now?

I am obssesive about my diet, I even use gluten-free soaps and makeups, etc... I have only eaten out twice since I started the diet in September. I guess my real concern is that one of my prescriptions may not really be gluten-free. That is the only thing that I can think of.

Or could it just be taking this long to drop down to normal?

Also, if one does have a set-back due to a cross-contamination, how long will their numbers typically show positive on a TTG IgA test?Unfortunately, I am part of an HMO, and my doctor admits that neither she nor any of her colleagues are very experienced with celiac, so I have been telling her what tests to order and what needs to be done...so, her telling me that I must be doing well with my diet, isn't a very reliable opinion.

Any opinions or help would be sooooooooooo appreciated.

Thank you!

PS Why can't our doctors just know more about celiac? argh

  • 2 weeks later...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JodiC Apprentice
I was diagnosed with Celiac Sprue in late August of 2008 (via blood tests and endoscopy). My diagnostic TTG IgA test was leveled at 157. I was just retested and now my level is 65. So, my doctor told me that I must be doing a good job with my gluten-free diet as my number has clearly dropped, but everything that i have read has said that it should be at a negative level....So...am I doing things right? Shouldn't my test be negative by now?

I am obssesive about my diet, I even use gluten-free soaps and makeups, etc... I have only eaten out twice since I started the diet in September. I guess my real concern is that one of my prescriptions may not really be gluten-free. That is the only thing that I can think of.

Or could it just be taking this long to drop down to normal?

Also, if one does have a set-back due to a cross-contamination, how long will their numbers typically show positive on a TTG IgA test?Unfortunately, I am part of an HMO, and my doctor admits that neither she nor any of her colleagues are very experienced with celiac, so I have been telling her what tests to order and what needs to be done...so, her telling me that I must be doing well with my diet, isn't a very reliable opinion.

Any opinions or help would be sooooooooooo appreciated.

Thank you!

PS Why can't our doctors just know more about celiac? argh

your levels are dropping at an adequate rate.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,394
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shannon S.
    Newest Member
    Shannon S.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Hope you're feeling better.   I use a combination of Thiamine, Cobalamine, and Pyridoxine (Vitamins B 1, B12, and B6) for pain relief.  Together these vitamins together have pain killing effects (analgesic).  They are water soluble, so the body can easily excrete any excess.  They are safe to take.   Hope this helps.   Mechanisms of action of vitamin B1 (thiamine), B6 (pyridoxine), and B12 (cobalamin) in pain: a narrative review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35156556/
    • trents
      I did some research on what exactly is gluten . . . what defines it.  "The term gluten usually refers to the elastic network of a wheat grain's proteins, gliadin and glutenin primarily . . . " "The types of grains that contain gluten include all species of wheat (common wheat, durum, spelt, khorasan, emmer and einkorn), and barley, rye, and some cultivars of oat" (emphasis mine) "The storage proteins in other grains, such as maize (zeins) and rice (rice protein), are sometimes called gluten, but they do not cause harmful effects in people with celiac disease." (emphasis mine) From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluten What I found most interesting is that some cultivars of oats contain gluten. Could this explain, in part at least, the controversy surrounding oats? I mean, depending on the source, it could indeed sometimes include gluten and cause a celiac reaction.
    • Scott Adams
      Your point about the limitations of current testing is valid, but the idea of "molecular mimicry" with rice and corn glutens is less clear. While corn contains zein, which can trigger reactions in some celiac patients, rice is generally considered safe and lacks proteins structurally similar to gluten. The term "molecular mimicry" is often overused and not well-supported in the context of all grains. While your experience with corn is noteworthy, extending this to all grains, including rice, may not be scientifically justified. Testing and research should indeed improve, but claims about all grains causing similar reactions need more evidence.
    • trents
      I think Scott speaks truth. And I think there is more to this than the prospect of her having celiac disease. If it wasn't this issue, I'm betting it would be another. 
    • Scott Adams
      So one does need a specific inherited gene in order to develop celiac disease, so in some way I suppose anyone with celiac disease could take the negative approach of blaming their parents for getting it, however, it also takes some other environmental trigger, such as a specific virus or other factor, and this part is not necessarily caused by the parents. Around 40% of people have the genes to get celiac disease, but only around 1% actually get it.  In any case, we could all go through life complaining about all sorts of different wrongs supposedly caused by our parents, however, it's probably a lot more healthy for everyone to try to deal with life in a more positive way and instead move forward. For most people it's probably far more important to maintain positive family relationships in life than it is to try to attach blame to family members for getting any disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...