Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Predisposition, gluten-free Since Birth -- Now What?


Anya78

Recommended Posts

Anya78 Explorer

My 2.5 year old has never had gluten. I have Celiac, as does my father. I worry about the non-typical symptoms of Celiac (including cognitive development issues) that don't obviously point to Celiac, so we have been overly cautious and have never given my son gluten. We did the genetic test and he received the Celiac genes from both me and my husband, which makes him much more likely to develop Celiac. Although, he still might never actually develop it, even with this strong genetic predisposition.

I feel like I need to give my son gluten at some point to see what happens. He's starting preschool soon and I feel like it would be kind of silly to send special snacks to school and make a big fuss over him being gluten-free, if he's never even had the chance to actually develop the disease. But I still worry that it will cause some major, irreversible change in him.

Anyone ever been in this situation or have any advice on what I should do? I am thinking of calling a specialist to see if they will give me advice over the phone. Perhaps if I start him on gluten, I will keep a journal of any physical or behavioral changes and after a certain period of time have him do the blood screening test.

Thanks!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



flourgirl Apprentice

Because of genetics there is a high likelihood that your son may have Celiac. You have started him in a lifestyle without gluten and he is doing just fine. Why take the risk of problems? He may have symptoms and damage that you may never see. If this were me, I would continue the gluten free diet with him, be safe and be sure. Like many others.....how I wish that this information was available to me when I was young. By the time I got a diagnosis, I have had lifetime of illnesses and symptoms that no one could pinpoint a cause.....and my struggle to recover post-diagnosis has been long and difficult. It may not be convenient to keep him on the diet...but it may be a lifesaver. I say, better safe than sorry.

Kibbie Contributor

My 4 year old daughter was diagnosed at 18 months and she has been gluten free ever since. I now have a 6 month old boy who carries one of the genes for Celiac Disease and puts him at a 40% chance of developing it some day (ant a 60% chance of him not). We have chosen to keep him gluten free until he requests something different, at that point in time we will decide what to do. I figgure at least this way if he does ever develop it he will have grown up with gluten free foods so it wont be a major change for him. His pediatrician is all for waiting till he requests something different.

swalker Newbie

I'm from the "an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of cure" school of thought as well.

He's never had gluten foods so he doesn't feel like he's missing anything and if he takes his own food to preschool right from the start, it won't seem unusual to him.

Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

I agree with swalker. I would rather prevent illness then treat it. My 20 month old daughter has never had gluten. I feel like my daughter is not missing a thing. We are a gluten free home and if she grows up only eating gluten free food then she won't know what she is missing. I don't want her to go through the same health problems her brother did.

I don't think it's silly at all for your son to take gluten free snacks to school. You could explain to the school staff that although he doesn't have the disease you are keeping him gluten free so he doesn't develop it. Tell them he is carrying all the right gene for Celiac and he could develop it if he eats gluten. You are being truthful and letting the staff know that they need to be diligent in keeping him safe.

Pattymom Newbie

My dd was gluten free from 6 weeks old until 2 years. I had taken myself ( and thus her) off in infancy b/c of horrible stinky mucousy poop. She's my 4th and I knew it was wrong adn figured it mus be somehting I was eating. After I felt better, I had the blood test, and was still positive even off gluten for a few months. so we btoh stayed off until 2 when the MD told me to try her on gluten, so we could test her and confirm or see if she "outgrew" it. Well, she has no obvious GI symptoms and the blood test was negative, so she ate gluten. Until at her 3 year check-u we noted that she was basically tapered off in growth. MD was still no concerned, we switched MD and at 3.5 I go th3er re-tested (still negative) and took her back off gluten. She started growing some, then off dairy too, started growign a little more, but now at 1 year off gluten, her weight gain is still really slow and height only minimallly better, and I still have no medical results to prove that she is gluten intolerant. though, we recently did a gluten challenge for 1 month and scope, she developed horrible constipation and a blistery rash on her belly and arm, and was a tantrummy mess. til the scope was fine. The GI is great, and encouraged me to take her back off any way. He said it's healthy diet and if it solves her symptoms stick with it.

In summary, wish I had kept her off and went with my instincts like I did when she was little and knew no other way. Overall, she is great about it, though since she clearly remembers eating some gluten, she sometimes wants it. As far as other kid, she's nor in pre-school, but at her suzuki violin group when we were checking snacks, another little girl came up and asked if we food allergies too, and they had a little bonding talk about what they couldn't eat and how there mom's had to check. food allergies are not so uncommon that even kids seem to accept it in out experience. Even better, at the next group, another little girl who was bringing snack wanted to make sure mine could eat it so she has her Mom check and make sure. My dd was thrilled to have the snack and have a friend who made the effort for her ( I pointed it out with great praise).

good luck with your choice, I know it's tough one.

Patty

Alison Rookie

Both my daughters have been gluten-free since the womb -- they are now almost 5 and 3. We are a gluten-free household and I agree with many people that have said already that the inconvenience of having a child gluten-free outweighs the risks associated with giving him gluten. I strongly believe that I am preventing possible health problems that have been associated with gluten and that are seen in many kids these days -- speech delay, attention problems, stomach aches, moodiness, crying easily, diarrhea, constipation, growth delay, night terrors. Even diabetes gets diagnosed before celiac when it could possibly have been prevented. Don't worry about any stigma attached to having your child gluten-free in school or anywhere else -- do what is right for the child!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfb1 Rookie
Because of genetics there is a high likelihood that your son may have Celiac. You have started him in a lifestyle without gluten and he is doing just fine. Why take the risk of problems? He may have symptoms and damage that you may never see. If this were me, I would continue the gluten free diet with him, be safe and be sure. Like many others.....how I wish that this information was available to me when I was young. By the time I got a diagnosis, I have had lifetime of illnesses and symptoms that no one could pinpoint a cause.....and my struggle to recover post-diagnosis has been long and difficult. It may not be convenient to keep him on the diet...but it may be a lifesaver. I say, better safe than sorry.

um...

'high likelihood'?? without any information about the childs' other parent (even carrying the MHC haplotype) is insufficient information to determine anything.

celiac is NOT a simply inherited trait -- regardless of what the 'gene testing' companies would like you to believe. i have no idea where the other poster received the 60:40 information.

it is MUCH more complex than that. to make an informed estimate of genetic risk; one would need to have information regarding the other parents symptomology, blood tests, etc. and info from any other siblings.

i also understand your desire to 'know'; and to have your child not worry about being singled out in school. in this case; you could start with simple allergy testing for gluten.

there is very little good data regarding the initial contact with gluten among celiac children. and, frankly, i would like to know beforehand if exposure could cause diarrhea/vomiting. if the kid is 'embarassed' by being gluten-free, there are worse things... this would also save time/worry when dealing with school nurses/administration -- because you know that there will always be inevitable mistakes.

personally; i would (and DID) give my kid a slice of bread for lunch and see what happens.

dadoffiveboys Rookie

My fourth son (of 5) was gluten-free only starting at about 2. We were worried a little because he wasn't talking 'normally' it seemed. When we took him gluten-free, within about 2 weeks his speech picked up dramatically. I would say if you have a strong family history (like I do) of gluten issues, I would definitely keep them off gluten. A 'trial' of gluten though is interesting to see what happens. It turns out I haven't had problems with trials because we managed to get 'cross-contaminated'. It turns out though that my second oldest son- his symptoms were fatigue and asthma - that it's almost IMPOSSIBLE to tell he had a gluten reaction until he starts feeling tired much later - so you really need to do it in a controlled fashion ONCE and see what changes occur. Each of my five boys has completely different reactions to gluten (unfortunately.. they are all negative).

Alison Rookie

The problem with just giving a child a piece of bread to see what happens is that it can take days, months, even years for symptoms of gluten intolerance or celiac to manifest. During that time, there could be damage happening that are not obvious gastrointestinal problems like vomiting or diarrhea. It could be subtle behavioral or neurological problems.

I am curious what "gluten allergy" tests gfb1 recommends? A child cannot be tested for celiac or gluten intolerance if they haven't been eating gluten. It could take months or even years of eating gluten to test positive on the current accepted medical tests for celiac. A test for wheat allergy (IgE antibodies) can be done by an allergist, but this is a whole different thing. What is a simple gluten allergy test?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,952
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Althea W
    Newest Member
    Althea W
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It's nice to see celiac-safe options out there for guest homes.
    • Scott Adams
      Your situation involves interpreting elevated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgG levels, which can indeed be confusing without clear symptoms or additional diagnostic tools like a biopsy. Here’s a possible approach to help clarify your next steps: Understanding DGP IgG: DGP IgG is a blood test often used to help diagnose celiac disease, particularly in individuals with IgA deficiency. However, since you’ve confirmed you don’t have IgA deficiency, the focus should shift to other celiac-specific tests, such as tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) and endomysial antibodies (EMA-IgA), which are more specific for celiac disease. Elevated DGP IgG alone is not diagnostic of celiac disease but may indicate gluten-related immune activity. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): You’re correct that NCGS does not typically show abnormalities in blood tests like celiac disease does. NCGS is diagnosed based on symptoms (e.g., bloating, fatigue, brain fog) that improve on a gluten-free diet, after celiac disease and wheat allergy have been ruled out. Since you don’t currently have symptoms, NCGS seems less likely in your case. Possible Next Steps: Monitor Symptoms: If you remain asymptomatic, it’s reasonable to continue eating gluten and retest after some time. This is because celiac disease can develop or become symptomatic later, and ongoing gluten consumption is necessary for accurate testing. Repeat Testing: Consider repeating the tTG-IgA test, as it is the most sensitive and specific for celiac disease. If this is also elevated, it strengthens the case for further investigation. Genetic Testing: If available, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genetic testing can help rule out celiac disease if negative, as nearly all celiac patients carry one or both of these genes. However, a positive result doesn’t confirm celiac disease, as these genes are common in the general population. Dietary Trial: If testing remains inconclusive and you develop symptoms, a supervised gluten-free diet trial might provide clarity. However, this should only be done after thorough testing, as going gluten-free prematurely can interfere with accurate diagnosis. Biopsy Limitation: Since a biopsy is not available in your town, you’ll need to rely on blood tests and clinical judgment. If your tests remain inconclusive but you develop symptoms, you may need to travel to a facility that can perform a biopsy for definitive diagnosis. In summary, if I were in your position, I would continue consuming gluten, monitor for symptoms, and retest with more specific celiac markers (tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA) in a few months. If symptoms develop or tests remain ambiguous, consulting a gastroenterologist for further guidance would be advisable. Always work with a healthcare provider to interpret results and tailor next steps to your specific situation.
    • trents
      The fact is, we know very little about the mechanism of NCGS at this point. We know much more about celiac disease. Some experts believe that NCGS can transition into celiac disease. And I do not agree with what you read about NCGS not producing any elevated antibody tests. IMO, and I have no scientific data to support this, it's just a hunch base on reading many, many forum contributor test result reports, elevated igg antibodies may signal a transition from NCGS to celiac disease.  But there are other things besides gluten that can cause elevated dgp igg and ttg igg antibody levels. So, yes. I would continue to monitor the situation if I were you and get regular testing. Not necessarily every 6 months but yearly anyway if you can. In the meantime, if you know gluten causes you unwellness, continue to avoid it.
    • Scott Adams
      Statins are a widely prescribed class of medications used to lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes. Extensive scientific research, including large-scale randomized controlled trials, has demonstrated their efficacy and safety for most individuals. Statins work by inhibiting an enzyme involved in cholesterol production in the liver, thereby reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, often referred to as "bad" cholesterol. Importantly, statins do not "remove all fats" from the body, as suggested in your post. They specifically target cholesterol synthesis and do not deplete essential fats, such as those required for brain function, hormone production, or nutrient absorption. The body still maintains its necessary fat reserves, including healthy fats, which are critical for physiological processes. Regarding the claim that statins cause internal bleeding by making blood vessels permeable, this is not supported by scientific evidence. Statins are not known to increase the risk of internal bleeding. However, like all medications, they can have side effects, such as muscle pain or, in rare cases, liver enzyme abnormalities. The benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk generally outweigh the risks for most patients, particularly those with a history of heart disease or high cholesterol. The suggestion to use odorless garlic, magnesium, vitamin K, and calcium for heart health may have some merit, as these supplements can support cardiovascular function in certain contexts. For example, magnesium is involved in muscle and nerve function, while vitamin K plays a role in blood clotting and bone health. However, these should not replace evidence-based treatments like statins when prescribed by a healthcare provider. Always consult a medical professional before making changes to medication or starting new supplements, as individual health needs vary.
    • trents
      Just judging from the reports we get from forum members sharing their endoscopy results, very common. But we also get a lot of reports of inflammation in those areas coupled with a negative biopsy for celiac. But I wonder if in a lot of those latter cases we are seeing NCGS or a transition from NCGS to celiac. I have no scientific data to support that. It's just a hunch.
×
×
  • Create New...