Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many P.p.m. (gluten) Can You Safely Tolerate?


doodle

Recommended Posts

doodle Rookie

Hey everyone, we are busy baking up a storm for our first day of gluten-free baking at the market and much to my horror I had a call from a supplier I know to inform me that he had one of "our" (his and mine from the same distributor) flours tested independently and found that they were over our Canadian "legal limit" of 20 p p m. (parts per million) All the rest were fine but it was just one product that was a bit over our Cnd safety standard.

It is my understanding that in the states, your allowable p p m is much higher than that and I wanted to find out how many celiacs are able to tolerate:

any VS some VS up to XX p p m of gluten in their flours and products.

I realize in a perfect world it would be great to have 0 ppm but that seems to be unrealistic according to my research. The cost to have each and every bag of flour tested would be astronomical and then what can I do with "almost" gluten free product :( ?

You see as it turns out, my distributor takes every precaution to avoid cross contamination but I have no control as to what has happened before it gets to my doors. So I would appreciate hearing from you to help me with my dilema.

And yes I am diligently sourcing another supplier , it's just the short term issue I need to deal with and your information would be very helpful.

thanks , doodle


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tim-n-VA Contributor

It is a long article and I don't have time to sort thru it but a recent discussion on this cited this article as a source for threshold info:

Open Original Shared Link

nutralady2001 Newbie

In Australia gluten must be <5 ppm to qualify as gluten free (but must still be stated on the label)

  • 2 weeks later...
jrc121 Newbie

Zero.

I have celiac disease.

psawyer Proficient

This is one of those seemingly simple questions that does not have a simple answer.

The reason is that ppm is not the real issue. You must consider the total amount of gluten consumed over the course of time, say, a single day.

If I eat four slices of bread which are 5 ppm that is the same as one slice of bread that is 20 ppm.

MaryJones2 Enthusiast

Tim and Peter are correct about the PPM being a complex beast. 20PPM is generally accepted in the US but not yet a regulation. This is also a good explanation of PPM: Open Original Shared Link (There is one update to the doc - Europe also set their limit to 20PPM recently)

Did your supplier say what a bit over was? There are quite a few suppliers of flours made in dedicated facilities that would consistently fall well under 20ppm so maybe going with one of those companies would make you feel at ease knowing that you didn't have to test every batch that came in or worry about getting a call like that after the fact.

As you said, the immediate concern is the "almost gluten-free" bread and what to do with it. My concern is that you serve it to people who can't tolerate it and they get sick. People talk a lot when a product makes them sick and it could potentially hurt your future sales. Maybe if you put up a sign explaining the situation and let your customers know that you're getting a new supplier? The ones that know they are very sensitive would wait and the ones that know they could eat your bread would certainly try it. I think everyone would appreciate the honesty.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

A standard in PPM makes sense as a way to keep us from doing complex arithmetic in the grocery store. It does have implied assumptions. The two big ones are that a typical celiac can eat some small amount of gluten without clinical results and that a "reasonable" amount will be consumed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa16 Collaborator

Oh doodle, I am so sorry this happened to you.

I know you were trying really hard to undertake the new business the best and most respectful way possible. You really did your homework. I bet you are hopping mad. I would be :-(

Yes, I think if I were in your shoes, I would put a special label on that batch of product to explain what happened-- maybe you can give an approximation of the ppms you know about. I don't know what "slightly over" means, exactly. If it were 21 ppm, say, many people might not feel so bad about eating it. But if it is more like 50ppm, a lot more people wouldm't touch it. But people who are gluten light would.

Unfortuantely gluten is such a tricky beast and it turns up in so many places you don't expect in small quantities. I saw a post on here about Domata flours that said they actually walk the fields to make sure there are no gluten grains growing nearby or mixed in with the crop. Maybe you can check them out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.