Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many P.p.m. (gluten) Can You Safely Tolerate?


doodle

Recommended Posts

doodle Rookie

Hey everyone, we are busy baking up a storm for our first day of gluten-free baking at the market and much to my horror I had a call from a supplier I know to inform me that he had one of "our" (his and mine from the same distributor) flours tested independently and found that they were over our Canadian "legal limit" of 20 p p m. (parts per million) All the rest were fine but it was just one product that was a bit over our Cnd safety standard.

It is my understanding that in the states, your allowable p p m is much higher than that and I wanted to find out how many celiacs are able to tolerate:

any VS some VS up to XX p p m of gluten in their flours and products.

I realize in a perfect world it would be great to have 0 ppm but that seems to be unrealistic according to my research. The cost to have each and every bag of flour tested would be astronomical and then what can I do with "almost" gluten free product :( ?

You see as it turns out, my distributor takes every precaution to avoid cross contamination but I have no control as to what has happened before it gets to my doors. So I would appreciate hearing from you to help me with my dilema.

And yes I am diligently sourcing another supplier , it's just the short term issue I need to deal with and your information would be very helpful.

thanks , doodle


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tim-n-VA Contributor

It is a long article and I don't have time to sort thru it but a recent discussion on this cited this article as a source for threshold info:

Open Original Shared Link

nutralady2001 Newbie

In Australia gluten must be <5 ppm to qualify as gluten free (but must still be stated on the label)

  • 2 weeks later...
jrc121 Newbie

Zero.

I have celiac disease.

psawyer Proficient

This is one of those seemingly simple questions that does not have a simple answer.

The reason is that ppm is not the real issue. You must consider the total amount of gluten consumed over the course of time, say, a single day.

If I eat four slices of bread which are 5 ppm that is the same as one slice of bread that is 20 ppm.

MaryJones2 Enthusiast

Tim and Peter are correct about the PPM being a complex beast. 20PPM is generally accepted in the US but not yet a regulation. This is also a good explanation of PPM: Open Original Shared Link (There is one update to the doc - Europe also set their limit to 20PPM recently)

Did your supplier say what a bit over was? There are quite a few suppliers of flours made in dedicated facilities that would consistently fall well under 20ppm so maybe going with one of those companies would make you feel at ease knowing that you didn't have to test every batch that came in or worry about getting a call like that after the fact.

As you said, the immediate concern is the "almost gluten-free" bread and what to do with it. My concern is that you serve it to people who can't tolerate it and they get sick. People talk a lot when a product makes them sick and it could potentially hurt your future sales. Maybe if you put up a sign explaining the situation and let your customers know that you're getting a new supplier? The ones that know they are very sensitive would wait and the ones that know they could eat your bread would certainly try it. I think everyone would appreciate the honesty.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

A standard in PPM makes sense as a way to keep us from doing complex arithmetic in the grocery store. It does have implied assumptions. The two big ones are that a typical celiac can eat some small amount of gluten without clinical results and that a "reasonable" amount will be consumed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa16 Collaborator

Oh doodle, I am so sorry this happened to you.

I know you were trying really hard to undertake the new business the best and most respectful way possible. You really did your homework. I bet you are hopping mad. I would be :-(

Yes, I think if I were in your shoes, I would put a special label on that batch of product to explain what happened-- maybe you can give an approximation of the ppms you know about. I don't know what "slightly over" means, exactly. If it were 21 ppm, say, many people might not feel so bad about eating it. But if it is more like 50ppm, a lot more people wouldm't touch it. But people who are gluten light would.

Unfortuantely gluten is such a tricky beast and it turns up in so many places you don't expect in small quantities. I saw a post on here about Domata flours that said they actually walk the fields to make sure there are no gluten grains growing nearby or mixed in with the crop. Maybe you can check them out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,601
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.