Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Do You React To Stevia

sixtytwo

By sixtytwo
in Food Intolerance & Leaky Gut

Recommended Posts

sixtytwo Apprentice
sixtytwo
Posted

Because of the horrible reaction people are getting to Splenda and because I want to stay away from the other artificial sweetners, I got some stevia from Walmart, Truvia............it gave me the worst diarrhea. I know it must be that as I didn't change my eating habits at all other than that. I think Splenda gave me the metalliac taste in the mouth that is talked about in the wonderful article that was suggested on this board. If you have not read it, you should. You would never eat it again. I also have been having bad "nerve" headaches, not migraines and feel it could have contributed to those. I wouldn't touch the stuff now. I am using real sugar in controlled amounts and counting it on the Weight Watcher program that I am on. I think the less chemicals you put in your body the better off you are. I was taking lots of supplements too and have backed way off on them.

Barbara

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


RiceGuy Collaborator
RiceGuy
Posted

Well, there is a notable difference between Stevia and Truvia. They are not the same, and a reaction to Truvia would in no way mean that Stevia itself was the culprit.

The main ingredient in Truvia is Open Original Shared Link, a sugar alcohol, and these are known to cause D in some people. There is also the concern of how the erythritol is produced. I think I recall reading that corn is commonly used.

I only use Pure Stevia powder, and it has no other ingredients whatsoever. If a person has a reaction to such a pure product, then that would be a different matter.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
The main ingredient in Truvia is Open Original Shared Link, a sugar alcohol

That is very interesting. Sugar alcohols give me D within the hour. Goes right through me <_<

I can't tolerate any artificial sugar substitutes, but have never tried Stevia. As I understand it, it's an herb that tastes very sweet. If that's the case, it wouldn't be digested the same as the sugar alcohols (or not digested, as the case may be).

I agree that if you still want to, try a little pure stevia and see if that works for you.

Why the heck did they feel they needed to add sugar alcohols to it? :huh: Jeesh.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,391
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Gayle Lafond
    Newest Member
    Gayle Lafond
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Oats gluten free?

      By trents · Posted

      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...