Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Negative...


DoogiePCT

Recommended Posts

DoogiePCT Apprentice

Hi Everyone,

I'm a 22 year old male with a history of thyroid cancer. So for the past few years, I've been having fatigue issues, along with gastrointestinal symptoms....I've also had a skin rash that looks to me like herpetiforms, and I have a diagnosed thyroid disorder that is well under control. Recently, I've become aware of Celiac disease, and called my doctor, and he informed that when I had an endoscopy a few months ago, they took a piece of my intestine to biopsy for celiac sprue, which came back negative. I asked him to fax it to me, and sure enough, they did and its negative.

My question is, could the biopsy be wrong? Or could I not have been consuming enough gluten in the days before for it to show?

Thanks so much.

Doug


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Welcome to the board!

How many biopsy samples did the pathology report describe?

Gfresh404 Enthusiast
Hi Everyone,

I'm a 22 year old male with a history of thyroid cancer. So for the past few years, I've been having fatigue issues, along with gastrointestinal symptoms....I've also had a skin rash that looks to me like herpetiforms, and I have a diagnosed thyroid disorder that is well under control. Recently, I've become aware of Celiac disease, and called my doctor, and he informed that when I had an endoscopy a few months ago, they took a piece of my intestine to biopsy for celiac sprue, which came back negative. I asked him to fax it to me, and sure enough, they did and its negative.

My question is, could the biopsy be wrong? Or could I not have been consuming enough gluten in the days before for it to show?

Thanks so much.

Doug

You would have had to have been gluten-free for at least four weeks for it to skew the biopsy in any way. A couple days is not going to make a difference.

I am a bit skeptical as whether or not a biopsy can miss damage. I'm sure there are people out there that will disagree with me but if enough samples are taken it is rare for a biopsy to miss damage. Keep in mind though, a biopsy can only diagnose Celiac disease. Currently there is no diagnostic criteria for "Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity." NCGS is however gaining more and more attention and I would not be surprised if it becomes an official diagnosis within the next few years.

It is believed that NCGS affects significantly more people than Celiac does. It has also been noted that if people with NCGS continue to consume gluten for a long enough time period, they are very likely to develop Celiac disease. Many people, myself included, believe that Celiac Disease and NCGS are essentially the same thing. In Celiac however, the first organ that is attacked just happens to be the small intestine.

I myself would be considered a non-celiac. I had negative blood work and a negative biopsy, but still responded favorably to a gluten-free diet. The best way to know for sure if gluten is effecting you in any way is to give a gluten-free diet a try. See if you feel any better. But give it some time, I noticed an improvement within a day or two while some people don't start feeling better for months.

jerseyangel Proficient

It's my understanding (and the belief of my former gastroenterologist) that the patchy damage from Celiac can be missed. The small intestine is around 22 feet long, and even with the doctor taking multiple samples (they should take 6-10) it can still be missed. There is also the issue of the skill of the person reading the test--milder damage can be overlooked this way.

If your doctor indeed only took one sample, it's quite possible any damage that might be there was missed.

A positive biopsy can rule Celiac in, but a "negative" can't altogether rule it out. If you've had the biopsy and the bloodwork, I would suggest giving the diet a try for a month and see if you feel better. :)

DoogiePCT Apprentice

Hey all--

the report from the biopsy report says, quote: "Received in formalin, labeled "biopsy duodenum" are three (3) irregular fragments of soft, tan, mucosal tissue averaging 0.3 cm, in maximum dimension which are submitted in toto. 1/3 bm/ab. Small Bowel- duodenum-BIOPSY Negative small intestinal mucosa."

That puts me at ease that I haven't been murdering my own body with what I eat, since my guess is I don't have it. I will have the blood test and then let it go, the anxiety will be too much for me. LOL.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Hey all--

the report from the biopsy report says, quote: "Received in formalin, labeled "biopsy duodenum" are three (3) irregular fragments of soft, tan, mucosal tissue averaging 0.3 cm, in maximum dimension which are submitted in toto. 1/3 bm/ab. Small Bowel- duodenum-BIOPSY Negative small intestinal mucosa."

That puts me at ease that I haven't been murdering my own body with what I eat, since my guess is I don't have it. I will have the blood test and then let it go, the anxiety will be too much for me. LOL.

Since all that was biopsied was the duodenum you are not in the clear. I would suggest that you give the diet a good strict try for a month or so to see if it helps. You also should see a dermatologist and get the area beside the rash biopsied looking specifically for DH. If you have DH you have celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,789
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Virogirl
    Newest Member
    Virogirl
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • K6315
      Hi Lily Ivy. Thanks for responding. Did you have withdrawal? If so, what was it like and for how long?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Doris Barnes! You do realize don't you that the "gluten free" label does not mean the same thing as "free of gluten"? According to FDA regulations, using the "gluten free" label simply means the product does not contain gluten in excess of 20 ppm. "Certified Gluten Free" is labeling deployed by an independent testing group known as GFCO which means the product does not contain gluten in excess of 10 ppm. Either concentration of gluten can still cause a reaction in folks who fall into the more sensitive spectrum of the celiac community. 20 ppm is safe for most celiacs. Without knowing how sensitive you are to small amounts of gluten, I cannot speak to whether or not the Hu Kitechen chocolates are safe for you. But it sounds like they have taken sufficient precautions at their factory to ensure that this product will be safe for the large majority of celiacs.
    • Doris Barnes
      Buying choclate, I recently boght a bar from Hu Kitchen (on your list of recommended candy. It says it is free of gluten. However on the same package in small print it says "please be aware that the product is produced using equipment that also processes nuts, soy, milk and wheat. Allergen cleans are made prior to production". So my question is can I trust that there is no cross contamination.  If the allergy clean is not done carefully it could cause gluten exposure. Does anyone know of a choclate brand that is made at a facility that does not also use wheat, a gluten free facility. Thank you.
    • trents
      @Manaan2, have you considered the possibility that she might be cross reacting to some food or foods that technically don't contain gluten but whose proteins closely resemble gluten. Chief candidates might be dairy (casein), oats (avenin), soy, corn and eggs. One small study showed that 50% of celiacs react to CMP (Cow's Milk Protein) like they do gluten.
    • Manaan2
      I realize I'm super late in the game regarding this topic but in case anyone is still reading/commenting on this one-does anyone who is especially sensitive have their personal observations to share regarding Primal Kitchen brand?  My daughter was diagnosed almost 2 years ago with celiac and within 6 months, her follow up labs were normal and a year later vitamin levels significantly improving, but we are still battling GI symptoms; particularly, constipation, so much that she has been on MiraLax every day since she was 3.  We've managed to get her down to a half cap every other day but without that, she continues to have issues (when she has a known, accidental ingestion unfortunately it takes a lot more MiraLax and additional laxatives to help her).  I was searching for something else and found this and am wondering if anyone has any specific comments regarding Primal Kitchen.  I feel like we are so incredibly careful with diet, logging diet and symptoms to look for patterns (we've had multiple dieticians help with this piece as well), not eating out, contacting companies and of course, there is always room for improvement but I'm running out of ideas regarding where her issues could be coming from.  Even if the Primal Kitchen is contributing, I'm sure it's not the only thing contributing but I can't help but think there must be handful of things that are working together and against her.  The ingredients list distilled white vinegar, but also white wine vinegar and balsamic, then "spices" which I'm always cautious about.  However, after contacting the company, I felt more comfortable allowing her to consume their products but over time I've realized that the front-line customer service support people don't always provide the most accurate of information.  Thanks for reading to anyone that does.   
×
×
  • Create New...