Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

3 Y.o. Daughter Gluten-free For A Week--can She Be Tested?


txmama

Recommended Posts

txmama Newbie

My 3 year old daughter was diagnosed with reflux because of daily vomiting. Even after a Nissen fundoplication last year, she continued to vomit frequently and has only been able to eat small amounts of food at a time.

The doctor had ruled out celiac disease after a negative blood test and a not particularly successful trial of a gluten-free diet. The problem was that by the time we removed the gluten, she had stopped eating ANYTHING. In retrospect, I think maybe it was hard to see any results, because she had already developed such a huge aversion to food. Shortly afterward, we had to get an NG tube and enroll in an inpatient feeding program to get her eating again. As soon as she started eating again, the vomiting began. She was dairy-free, but otherwise had a regular diet.

Throughout this year of hellish vomiting, she would have a few good days where she didn't throw up, which seemed inexplicable. Then 2 weeks ago, she suddenly stopped vomiting and began to ask for food, to tell me she wanted to eat, stuff she's never done before. This lasted 5 days. I was looking for anything I could find to explain this. What was different?

I had bought that gluten-free Gorilla Munch cereal instead of her usual wheat-based--get this--because I had a coupon! And it just so happened that I didn't give her any pasta, etc. for meals. So, she had five good days, until I made pasta and lentil soup for dinner one night, and she threw up a few hours later. This took me several days to piece together, and as soon as I did, I stopped the gluten. It's only been 3 days (but no vomit at all since!).

We have an appointment with a new GI doc on Wed at Texas Children's in Houston. Will a blood test be more accurate at 3 than it was at 18 mo.? Will this short period of gluten-free (less than a week) interfere with the test? Should we ask for genetic testing? Should we expect the doc to give a lot of weight to the results of the diet, or are they skeptical about this?

Thanks for your help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



debmom Newbie

I wouldn't expect the doctor to give much credence to ancedotal evidence-- none of ours have-- but it is clear that the diet solved all of my daughter's terrible pain, etc. I would stick with the diet without question. I hope your new doctor is open to your interpretation of your daughter's improvement, but even if not, don't be discouraged. many of us have had to stick to our guns, and eventually prove that gluten is the culprit even if the tests say otherwise.

A new book about digestive diseases says that probably only 15% of celiac is caught by the current testing. In the next few years, better tests will show that many more people are gluten intolerant or have celiac than current testing can show.

Genna'smom Apprentice

You have to fight for everything for your child.... My daughter at about 22 mos stopped eating and drinking altogether and ended up in the hospital and ended up wiht an NG tube and after 2 different hospitals they did a biopsy and it says she had early warning stages of celiac disease. She went gluten free in May of 2008 and now she is 3 and is eating better and has good days and has actually had 2 good weeks until today when she did not want to eat. My dr is telling me not to worry about cross contamination but others here are warning me that it could still be causing some of her concerns. Small, low weight and she has also been on a feeding tube for the whole year and had not slept through the night for her entire life.

OK back to your question - I know that the blood tests are very unrealiable and they only way they say is by biopsy or the change in diet and use that as your diagnosis. I am going to have her genetic tested (not covered by insurance ) to see if she has the gene that would make it so she has celiac disease. We had some genetic teting done on her when she was in my belly as her twin sister passed away from a genetic disorder so I really want to know.

Follow your mommy instincts, fight for what you feel is right and feel free to send me a private message if you want anything else answered.....

Bonnie

lizajane Rookie

i would really follow your instincts on this one. if she vomits when she eats gluten and does not vomit when she does not, i think it is already extremely clear what you need to do. my blood work was negative, but i ended up vomiting everything i ate for 2 weeks. it stopped immediately upon going gluten free. i started gluten-free before i got my biopsy results, which did indicate celiac.

the most important thing is that a doctor can't tell you what you can and can't feed your kid. (i mean... within reason! ha!) so even if the GIs all say she does not have celiac, you still don't have to feed her gluten. so just don't. she is better without it. so stay away from it.

txmama Newbie

Thanks for the encouragement. One thing I have going for me is that her dietary response is SO extreme. One day she vomits all day, the next she's vomit-free (on gluten-free). Hopefully, that will impress the dr, as I would like support and information from him (and not skepticism). I've written up the timeline ahead of our visit to go through with him.

My dh and I have already decided that continuing gluten for the sake of a diagnosis is out of the question given her reaction, and he can't stand the idea of putting her through endoscopy. So, we're prepared and decided on that front.

If there's anything else any of you can think of that we should know or consider going into the appt. tomorrow, I'd appreciate hearing it.

Carly

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,130
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Anna Poulin
    Newest Member
    Anna Poulin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
    • trents
      The tests outlined in the article I linked are rated according to "sensitivity" and "specificity". Sensitivity refers to how well the test does in not missing those who actually have the disease being tested for, in this case, celiac disease. The DGP-IGA test is estimated to have a sensitivity of 75% to 95%.  Specificity refers to how well the test does in not producing a positive score to medical conditions other than the one being tested for, in this case, celiac disease.  The DGP-IGA test is estimated to have a specificity of 90% to 100%. Obviously, in your case there is no issue with sensitivity. So, the only remaining question would be in relation to specificity. It is my observation from participating in this forum for many years and reading the posted test results from many, many forum contributors, that the likelihood of misdiagnosis due to a specificity issue diminishes greatly with high test score numbers. Still, there is a slight chance it could be due to something else. Think about it. If this were not so, why would your GI doc even be scheduling you for a biopsy?
    • Flosdiner
      How cold is Ottawa in winter?    
×
×
  • Create New...