Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endomyosil Autoantibodies


Twiggy

Recommended Posts

Twiggy Rookie

Hi everyone,i'm so glad i found this place its fascinating reading your topics.I havent been diagnosed yet but my doctor is pertty sure i have coeliac because of my symptoms and my blistery rash i am also hyopthyroid too.I had a emdomyosil (sp?) blood test done last week and i am worried because ive read that this quite often comes bak as a negative when people are actually coeliac.I have had loads of blood work done and lots of things were low like b12 ferritin and folate.I am desperate for a diagnosis so that i can quickly get myself well again.My shin bones and joints are really painfull and i get terrible muscle fatigue in my legs and arms.

Did any of the people here get a negative result for endomyasil autoantibodies and turn out to be coeliac??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Korwyn Explorer
Hi everyone,i'm so glad i found this place its fascinating reading your topics.

...

Did any of the people here get a negative result for endomyasil autoantibodies and turn out to be coeliac??

Hi Twiggy,

I'm glad you found us too. I had completely negative blood work results twice before going gluten-free. You'll find a lot of people here did. However I went gluten-free based off my Dr. recommendation because she was running out of other things to test me for, then three weeks later also went CF (Caesin Free/Cow's milk). I had sent in to Enterolab for the fecal anti-body testing and DNA just about a week after going gluten-free but I began having immediate (within days) improvement in my symptoms.

My Enterolab results came back positive for all but malabsorption, and including two genes for Celiac. My Dr. had already diagnosed me based of the dietary response even though the blood work was negative, but this confirmed it.

I'd strongly recommend if you can afford it to have at least the gene testing done, if for no other reason than to be able to know if you may have family members who are likely to be at risk also.

The best test though is to go gluten-free (and maybe CF) too and see if you begin improving. It may take several weeks to see significant change, or it may happen in days.

gfb1 Rookie
[snip]

I'd strongly recommend if you can afford it to have at least the gene testing done, if for no other reason than to be able to know if you may have family members who are likely to be at risk also.

[snip]

at the risk of being labelled an old crank (which i will admit to being on a part-time basis); asking for gene testing (ie., HLA haplotypes) is not a helpful diagnostic.

you may as well ask how many celiacs have brown (or brunette) hair. i'd guess about 80% or higher are brunette.

does this mean that all brunettes have celiac? i also do not believe that carrying genes for brown hair is any way to evaluate risk factors.

silly example, i know, but its the identical comparison with the DQ haplotypes.

Twiggy Rookie

Hi Guys,thanks for your input here.I'm just worried sick that its going to take months to get a diagnosis......patience isnt my strong point at the best of times :rolleyes:

ang1e0251 Contributor

If you have the rash, you can be tested for DH. If that is positive, you are celiac. Make sure they biopsy it properly, beside the lesion not from the lesion itself. You can access and article from the home page that outlines the procedure.

I know that the genetic testing does not diagnose but when other testing fails but you have a strong dietary response, your dr can use genetic testing as another piece of the puzzle to your health.

gfb1 Rookie
Hi Guys,thanks for your input here.I'm just worried sick that its going to take months to get a diagnosis......patience isnt my strong point at the best of times :rolleyes:

i understand completely... my motherinlaw used to say...

patience is a virtue,

possess it if you can.

seldom found in a woman,

and never in a man....

she was a hoot ... AND a celiac!

:)

anyway... the difficulty of diagnosis is compounded as the secondary symptoms (joint pain, fatigue, bloating, etc, etc) can be much worse to bear than the actual damage done to the intestinal tissue. in fact, they can actually occur BEFORE you test positive for intestinal damage (the antiendomysial antibodies).

its probably the single biggest reason that many folks on the list suggest going gluten-free and feeling better before a confirmed.gold.standard diagnosis.

i used to be in the 'wait for a confirmed diagnosis'-camp; but, have begun to come around to thinking that the duration and level of discomfort are just not worth it for some people. like all things, these are personal decisions where you can weigh your priorities and decide what's important. as long as everyone gets the facts (and not all the facts have been determined) and noone relies on the scam-peddlers and pseudoscience (and there are LOTS) there is no single correct answer for everyone.

here's to hoping you begin to heal and feel better..!

Korwyn Explorer
at the risk of being labelled an old crank (which i will admit to being on a part-time basis); asking for gene testing (ie., HLA haplotypes) is not a helpful diagnostic.

you may as well ask how many celiacs have brown (or brunette) hair. i'd guess about 80% or higher are brunette.

does this mean that all brunettes have celiac? i also do not believe that carrying genes for brown hair is any way to evaluate risk factors.

silly example, i know, but its the identical comparison with the DQ haplotypes.

Umm....I never said it was a diagnostic test. I said it might help her at least be aware if she or some of her family members may have a higher risk factor. The fact that I was diagnosed and carried the genetic predisposition was the factor that caused one of my sibling's doctor to have her tested via biopsy and it came back positive. So there can be significant value for some people.

And yes, your example was a silly, pointless, and irrelevant example and no it isn't an identical example.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfb1 Rookie
Umm....I never said it was a diagnostic test. I said it might help her at least be aware if she or some of her family members may have a higher risk factor. The fact that I was diagnosed and carried the genetic predisposition was the factor that caused one of my sibling's doctor to have her tested via biopsy and it came back positive. So there can be significant value for some people.

And yes, your example was a silly, pointless, and irrelevant example and no it isn't an identical example.

oh dear.

i guess i am showing my age, i suppose i meant the 'archaic' definition of 'silly', i.e.,

5. rustic; plain; homely.

i am very glad that any information led to someone else being diagnosed and getting relief; even if they were for the incorrect reasons.

i used to tell my students to 'show their work', because you can often arrive at the correct answer by making enough mistakes!!

:)

just knowing that an individual in a family had celiac disease would lead any certified (or competent) genetic counselor to suspect that other members of the family are at risk for the disease. HOWEVER, the HLA haplotypes are no more helpful, indeed they are LESS helpful than a standard celiac diagnosis arrived at by traditional means.

the 'hair color' example is EXACTLY how risk factors were calculated using the HLA haplotypes. and im(not-so)ho, equally useful.

Twiggy Rookie

Hi everyone just back from my GP appointment.Endomysial Antibody blood test was negative,doc is refering me to a gastroenteroligist,i have an appt for 2 weeks time.The doc hinks i have the desease as i present with all the classic symptoms but wants me to have a Gut Biopsy to confirm.He seems to think that whatever the result i should refrain from gluten and see if symptome persist.I am not willing to do this until i have spoken to the specialist and he tells me to do so.Doc said even if the results came back positive he would have still refered me to gastro clinic.....ahhhggghhh,the saga continues.....help! How many of you tested negative and were infact positive?Doc says a negative blood test could indicate advanced coeliac,i just want an answer either way <_<

gfb1 Rookie
Hi everyone just back from my GP appointment.Endomysial Antibody blood test was negative,doc is refering me to a gastroenteroligist,i have an appt for 2 weeks time.The doc hinks i have the desease as i present with all the classic symptoms but wants me to have a Gut Biopsy to confirm.He seems to think that whatever the result i should refrain from gluten and see if symptome persist.I am not willing to do this until i have spoken to the specialist and he tells me to do so.Doc said even if the results came back positive he would have still refered me to gastro clinic.....ahhhggghhh,the saga continues.....help! How many of you tested negative and were infact positive?Doc says a negative blood test could indicate advanced coeliac,i just want an answer either way <_<

i understand your impatience. many folks here and elsewhere went years before finding an answer. and it stunk.

however,

1st. if you start eating a gluten free diet (or, were gluten free prior to your blood test) -- you will more than likely have negative results. you MUST continue to eat a diet including gluten if you want to have a chance of receiving positive test results.

most people who have celiac disease would never have become sick at all (and not know they had a 'disease') if they never ate gluten. gluten triggers the disease; AND all the secondary effects (e.g., low nutritional status, vitamin deficiencies, aches&pains, etc,etc,etc). without the trigger, you will not have positive test results.

as for how many people test negative and actually have the disease is a very difficult question to answer (from a scientific point of view). 1st you have to know the population rates of false positives and false negatives; then you'd have to know how the celiac diagnosis was deduced (if all the tests were negative).

certain folks here will tell you that the symptoms of celiac disease occur long before there is sufficient physiological damage to actually register positive on the blood tests.

herein lies the rub.

be miserable long enough and test positive OR stop eating gluten for a few months and see if your symptoms are relieved. its a tough decision and different people come to different decisions based on all sorts of rationales.

Korwyn Explorer
Hi everyone just back from my GP appointment.Endomysial Antibody blood test was negative,doc is refering me to a gastroenteroligist,i have an appt for 2 weeks time.The doc hinks i have the desease as i present with all the classic symptoms but wants me to have a Gut Biopsy to confirm.He seems to think that whatever the result i should refrain from gluten and see if symptome persist.I am not willing to do this until i have spoken to the specialist and he tells me to do so.Doc said even if the results came back positive he would have still refered me to gastro clinic.....ahhhggghhh,the saga continues.....help! How many of you tested negative and were infact positive?Doc says a negative blood test could indicate advanced coeliac,i just want an answer either way <_<

Hi Twiggy,

Both of my blood workups were negative for IgA, as was my Dad's and my sister's. Both of them were diagnosed positive via dietary response for GI and my Dad was diagnosed based on dietary response. But my fecal IgA test was positive, even though the stool sample was taken on the day following one of the blood draws. Since going gluten-free my health has begun improving and I'm doing better than I have in several years. I'm now also dairy free and soy free which has begun clearing up additional issues.

And yes, if you are IgA deficient your blood work may never be positive. A significant percentage of people with Celiac are IgA deficient.

gfb1 Rookie
And yes, if you are IgA deficient your blood work may never be positive. A significant percentage of people with Celiac are IgA deficient.

absolutely.

approx 1:700 caucasians in the US are IgA deficient, there is a family history/heritable component... but, its inheritance pattern is unclear.

among celiacs, the literature is highly variable depending on country of origin and sample size; but around 1:70 celiacs present as IgA deficient.

there is also a 3rd subcategory of marginally-deficient IgA patients (low... but, not deficient) for which there is little to no evidence that it is associated with celiac disease; and may have more to do with age-bias in those surveys.

btw -- there is a very nice diagnosis decision tree for serologic diagnosis located here:

Open Original Shared Link

a few years old.... but, probably explains a lot of the current blood testing protocols...

Twiggy Rookie

Thanks folks!! I suppose i wil just have to 'wait it out' and hope the result will come in the end.i am a little ashamed to admit that at the tender age of 39 (tomorrow :rolleyes: )i have still not learned the art of patience.

Thanks for all your helpful input into this thread i really find it helpful to hear others opinions.x.x.x to you all

Korwyn Explorer
Thanks folks!! I suppose i wil just have to 'wait it out' and hope the result will come in the end.i am a little ashamed to admit that at the tender age of 39 (tomorrow :rolleyes: )i have still not learned the art of patience.

Thanks for all your helpful input into this thread i really find it helpful to hear others opinions.x.x.x to you all

Hope things work out and you find the answers you need. I'm curious though why you seem so determined not to try going gluten-free until instructed to do by the specialist if you are suffering? There are many people on here who never got a 'positive' confirmed test, but were diagnosed through dietary response.

samcarter Contributor

I had a negative EMA test. It was the only test my doctor would agree to do <_< . I read a paper once that stated about 20% of celiacs can be negative for EMA, they are referred to as "sero negative" celiacs. It could also be that the intestinal damage just isn't incredibly severe yet.

All I know is i had a VERY positive response to a gluten free diet. My psoriasis has improved dramatically, my brain fog and mood swings are gone/greatly reduced, and I'm no longer wanting to sleep in until 10 am like i used to. My poor husband would have to shake me awake in the mornings so I could tend to the kids and he could go to work! Now I wake up at a decent hour every morning, with energy to start off with.

My digestive system is much better--as I said to my husband, i didn't know it wasn't normal to have pain while going to the bathroom! Or to swing from constipation to diarrhea in the course of one day, or two days.

For me, at least, the gold standard is dietary response. If you have DH, by the way, a dermatologist can biopsy the rash and test for that. If it's DH, then you are celiac.

Twiggy Rookie

Thanks for your reply Sam :P the reason i dont want to stop eating gluten before ive seen the gastro guy's is because every article ive read tells you not to as its important in order to not to get a false negative.I just want to do everyting by the book so that i can get well quicker and not have the teests hampered in any way.I have suffered this long and i guess it wont hurt to put up with it for a little while longer......im gaining weight which is little odd,ive gained 14lbs in 12 months :( i hope this dosent continue

samcarter Contributor
Thanks for your reply Sam :P the reason i dont want to stop eating gluten before ive seen the gastro guy's is because every article ive read tells you not to as its important in order to not to get a false negative.I just want to do everyting by the book so that i can get well quicker and not have the teests hampered in any way.I have suffered this long and i guess it wont hurt to put up with it for a little while longer......im gaining weight which is little odd,ive gained 14lbs in 12 months :( i hope this dosent continue

Contrary to popular opinion, it is not uncommon for celiac patients or those with gluten intolerance to be gaining weight. If your intestines can't absorb nutrients (due to damage of the villi), then your body will react by holding onto calories, since it thinks it's starving. I never had the stereotypical thinness that is associated with celiac. But when I went gluten free, people started commenting that I had lost weight.

You're right, you need to stay on a gluten-filled diet in order to rule out false negatives.

Twiggy Rookie

I am covered in blisters now,knees elbows, feet and hands.my wrists and elbows are especialy sore.I hope the Gstro doc sees them on thursday and links the two together? I'm gluten free today and tomorrow cause i'm going away at the weekend and dont want to be ill/itchy or bloated.My lovely man i making me my first gluten free pizza for tonight's dinner,he really is a peach.

As for the weight issue......gah,it will just have to,well,........ wait!! :P

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,927
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DoraN
    Newest Member
    DoraN
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      The first set of results show two positive results for celiac disease, so at the very least it looks like you could have it, or at the least NCGS.   Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.      
    • Scott Adams
      Elevated tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) levels are highly specific for celiac disease, and they are a key biomarker used in its diagnosis. However, there are some rare instances where elevated tTG-IgA levels have been reported in conditions other than celiac disease. While these cases are not common, they have been documented in the literature. Below are some examples and references to studies or reviews that discuss these scenarios:  1. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS)    - NCGS typically does not cause elevated tTG-IgA levels, as it is not an autoimmune condition. However, some individuals with NCGS may have mild elevations in tTG-IgA due to intestinal inflammation or other factors, though this is not well-documented in large studies.    - Reference: Catassi, C., et al. (2013). *Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: The New Frontier of Gluten-Related Disorders*. Nutrients, 5(10), 3839–3853. [DOI:10.3390/nu5103839](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5103839)  2. Autoimmune Diseases    - Elevated tTG-IgA levels have been reported in other autoimmune conditions, such as type 1 diabetes, autoimmune hepatitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This is thought to be due to cross-reactivity or polyautoimmunity.    - Reference: Sblattero, D., et al. (2000). *The Role of Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase in the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease*. Autoimmunity Reviews, 1(3), 129–135. [DOI:10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00022-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00022-3)  3. Chronic Liver Disease    - Conditions like chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis can sometimes lead to elevated tTG-IgA levels, possibly due to increased intestinal permeability or immune dysregulation.    - Reference: Vecchi, M., et al. (2003). *High Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Role for Gluten-Free Diet?* Gastroenterology, 125(5), 1522–1523. [DOI:10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.031](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.031)  4. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)    - Some patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis may have elevated tTG-IgA levels due to intestinal inflammation and damage, though this is not common.    - Reference: Walker-Smith, J. A., et al. (1990). *Celiac Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease*. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 10(3), 389–391. [DOI:10.1097/00005176-199004000-00020](https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-199004000-00020)  5. Infections and Parasites    - While infections (e.g., giardiasis) are more commonly associated with false-positive tTG-IgA results, chronic infections or parasitic infestations can sometimes lead to elevated levels due to mucosal damage.    - Reference: Rostami, K., et al. (1999). *The Role of Infections in Celiac Disease*. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 11(11), 1255–1258. [DOI:10.1097/00042737-199911000-00010](https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199911000-00010)  6. Cardiac Conditions    - Rarely, heart failure or severe cardiovascular disease has been associated with elevated tTG-IgA levels, possibly due to gut ischemia and increased intestinal permeability.    - Reference: Ludvigsson, J. F., et al. (2007). *Celiac Disease and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study*. American Heart Journal, 153(6), 972–976. [DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019)  Key Points: - Elevated tTG-IgA levels are highly specific for celiac disease, and in most cases, a positive result strongly suggests celiac disease. - Other conditions causing elevated tTG-IgA are rare and often accompanied by additional clinical findings. - If celiac disease is suspected, further testing (e.g., endoscopy with biopsy) is typically required for confirmation. If you’re looking for more specific studies, I recommend searching PubMed or other medical databases using terms like "elevated tTG-IgA non-celiac" or "tTG-IgA in non-celiac conditions." Let me know if you’d like help with that!
    • MaryMJ
      I called zero water and they state their filters do not contain gluten or gluten containing ingredients. 
    • trents
      I agree. Doesn't look like you have celiac disease. Your elevated DGP-IGG must be due to something else. And it was within normal at that after your gluten challenge so it is erratic and doesn't seem to be tied to gluten consumption.
    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
×
×
  • Create New...