Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Could This Be Gluten?


Heidismom

Recommended Posts

Heidismom Newbie

We have had my 2.5 year old dd off gluten for almost 2 weeks now and she has been having some great results: sleeping through the night, fewer tantrums, happier, healthy appetite, stools have become normal.

This morning when she woke, she had a little rash, some red spots, not raised at all. This evening the spots are larger, and seem to be more of them. They are on her tummy, bottom, arms, and legs that I've seen so far. This evening she also has had 3 loose stools, each worse than the next. Anyone know if this sounds like she got some gluten? I thought about chicken pox, she's already had them, but that wouldn't rule it out, but they are not raised marks on her, just spots. She's also been pretty mean to her baby brother today too, not usual either. I'm racking my brain trying to think of when she may have gotten something she shouldn't have, but I can't think of anything. Would cross contamination after only two weeks off gluten come on so strong, because her older sisters are still eating gluten. (too expensive to get rid of all our food and start over in a family of six)

Anyway, I don't know what to think, the rashes I've read about online seem to be bumpy and weeping, that's not this (yet, knock on wood). Also wondering if maybe it's from being off gluten that she's having this, like maybe she's detoxing? I don't know, I'm lost in the whole gluten free thing, it's like I'm finding out new things that contain gluten all the time.

If anyone has any insight, familiar situations, I'd love to hear about it. Thanks.

Spoke to soon, some of the splotches are starting to raise, and some look like she got a little scratch on them.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ang1e0251 Contributor

Sounds like cc to me, if it's starting to blister. I had two different rashes, the blistery kind and the other the little bumps looked more like hives but with deep purple spreading out under the skin. Both itched like crazy and were very painful. For me the blisters can pop out with a pretty strong glutening incident. The other rash only reoccurs if I'm glutened over and over, every day. I was using a flavoring in my coffee that caused it last.

Matching a rash to a change in her behavior seems to point to gluten. Don't you think that to, since you wrote about it? It is very hard to figure out sometimes. Maybe you could tell us what she's eaten the last 24 hours or so. There might be something someone here can spot. Or maybe she got into something like dog food or soap or her sibling's sandwich?

Heidismom Newbie

I hadn't thought about the dog food, she does have access to that, she doesn't eat it, but she will sometimes play with it when no one is looking. I checked her soap, called the company, and they said it is gluten free. I wondered if behavior changes were part of things, sudden onset like that. So, our laundry detergent is ALL in the blue box for HE washers, I didn't see any ingredients jump out at me. We did just switch to it a few weeks ago. She had those little gerber dried fruits, rice, beans, honey, peanut butter, gluten-free pancakes, gluten-free cereal, organic milk, organic yogurt, unsweetened frozen blueberries, flax, gluten-free Animal cookies, spaghetti squash, spaghetti sauce, I can't think of anything else right now.

I am worried now, because the doctor wants me to put her back on gluten for 2 weeks so they can retest her bloodwork. Her first test came back negative, but she had been off gluten for a week and a half prior. She's gained a pound in the last 6 months, and now she finally has a good appetite, sleeping through the night not waking up screaming, no more diaper blowouts, much sweeter girl, and we've got to put her back on, and who's to say that one is going to come back positive either. They tried to tell me that it wasn't the problem because of the test, and I had to tell them that I had heard that if you're not eating gluten prior to it, it can be negative. Anyway, I'm tired, and annoyed, and sad that she's got to go through this and they won't just listen to her parents. Like we're going to make it up so that she can be on a gluten-free diet the rest of her life because that would be so much nicer and easier for us? Anyway, sorry about the rant. Thanks.

Sounds like cc to me, if it's starting to blister. I had two different rashes, the blistery kind and the other the little bumps looked more like hives but with deep purple spreading out under the skin. Both itched like crazy and were very painful. For me the blisters can pop out with a pretty strong glutening incident. The other rash only reoccurs if I'm glutened over and over, every day. I was using a flavoring in my coffee that caused it last.

Matching a rash to a change in her behavior seems to point to gluten. Don't you think that to, since you wrote about it? It is very hard to figure out sometimes. Maybe you could tell us what she's eaten the last 24 hours or so. There might be something someone here can spot. Or maybe she got into something like dog food or soap or her sibling's sandwich?

shayesmom Rookie
I am worried now, because the doctor wants me to put her back on gluten for 2 weeks so they can retest her bloodwork. Her first test came back negative, but she had been off gluten for a week and a half prior. She's gained a pound in the last 6 months, and now she finally has a good appetite, sleeping through the night not waking up screaming, no more diaper blowouts, much sweeter girl, and we've got to put her back on, and who's to say that one is going to come back positive either. They tried to tell me that it wasn't the problem because of the test, and I had to tell them that I had heard that if you're not eating gluten prior to it, it can be negative. Anyway, I'm tired, and annoyed, and sad that she's got to go through this and they won't just listen to her parents. Like we're going to make it up so that she can be on a gluten-free diet the rest of her life because that would be so much nicer and easier for us? Anyway, sorry about the rant. Thanks.

Two weeks of being back on gluten probably will be an exercise in futility considering that she tested negative before. I would think it would be more productive to check for genetic markers in conjunction with positive dietary response at this point.

And yes, I do agree that it is sad that a doctor would put a child through this to basically convince him/herself....when the parents already have committed to trialing the diet with successful results. At times it seems like it's more important to them to be "right" than to observe and acknowledge the positive physical response in their patient. Seems kinda backwards to me. I can appreciate wanting to rule OTHER things out at this point. But I think the question of gluten being a problem has been answered.

FYI, you don't "have" to put your child back on gluten because the doctor isn't convinced. You do have choices in this. You can seek a second opinion. Some doctors will diagnose based on dietary response. Others will diagnose based on dietary response and pre-disposing genetic markers. The question really is....what is best for your child and your family? Will the test results make any difference in how you proceed from here, knowing what you now know?

lizajane Rookie
Two weeks of being back on gluten probably will be an exercise in futility considering that she tested negative before. I would think it would be more productive to check for genetic markers in conjunction with positive dietary response at this point.

And yes, I do agree that it is sad that a doctor would put a child through this to basically convince him/herself....when the parents already have committed to trialing the diet with successful results. At times it seems like it's more important to them to be "right" than to observe and acknowledge the positive physical response in their patient. Seems kinda backwards to me. I can appreciate wanting to rule OTHER things out at this point. But I think the question of gluten being a problem has been answered.

FYI, you don't "have" to put your child back on gluten because the doctor isn't convinced. You do have choices in this. You can seek a second opinion. Some doctors will diagnose based on dietary response. Others will diagnose based on dietary response and pre-disposing genetic markers. The question really is....what is best for your child and your family? Will the test results make any difference in how you proceed from here, knowing what you now know?

we took my 4 year old so off gluten simply based on symptoms and his family history. i have celiac and my father in law does, too. we had excellent results. we have no intention of pursing a "diagnosis" because we already have one. it came from response to diet, not a doctor, but it was clear that he is better off without gluten. so it counts for us.

Heidismom Newbie

I am worried about how we will deal with schools if we don't have something from a doctor saying that she can't have gluten. It's been my experience here that the schools absolutely want a note from a doctor that says "so and so can't have this to eat," or they won't respect it. I don't want some teacher giving her graham crackers for a snack because she thinks I don't know what I'm talking about. Does anyone have experience with this? I am sure that for school lunches they have to have the doctor's note (which can be avoided by brown bagging it), but I don't know about snack time in the class room.

We started her back on gluten this morning, and have her sleeping next to our room tonight should she start throwing up like she did last time she had some. So far, she seems in a good mood though, her rash had started to fade, but is now blooming again, but she doesn't seem to be bothered by it. My husband and I have pretty much decided that should she start having a hard time with any of it, we will take her off, and keep her off. I am also going to try and get an appointment with the head doctor at the office, and see if we can get some better results from him than we did with the woman we saw (PA?). I do want to pursue the genetic testing once my husband starts working again and things are a little more stable. It's my understanding that you don't have to be eating gluten for those.

If things don't work out with this blood test, I will be talking to the actual doctor at her office to find out if he will at least put "gluten intolerant" in her file and give us a note when the need arises. I don't know what more I can do really, I'm not willing to put her at continued risk when it seems like such a difficult thing to diagnose in children.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,130
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Anna Poulin
    Newest Member
    Anna Poulin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
    • trents
      The tests outlined in the article I linked are rated according to "sensitivity" and "specificity". Sensitivity refers to how well the test does in not missing those who actually have the disease being tested for, in this case, celiac disease. The DGP-IGA test is estimated to have a sensitivity of 75% to 95%.  Specificity refers to how well the test does in not producing a positive score to medical conditions other than the one being tested for, in this case, celiac disease.  The DGP-IGA test is estimated to have a specificity of 90% to 100%. Obviously, in your case there is no issue with sensitivity. So, the only remaining question would be in relation to specificity. It is my observation from participating in this forum for many years and reading the posted test results from many, many forum contributors, that the likelihood of misdiagnosis due to a specificity issue diminishes greatly with high test score numbers. Still, there is a slight chance it could be due to something else. Think about it. If this were not so, why would your GI doc even be scheduling you for a biopsy?
    • Flosdiner
      How cold is Ottawa in winter?    
×
×
  • Create New...