Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Restaurants


Lisa

Recommended Posts

Lisa Mentor

A recent trend (well maybe not a trend) that I am seeing, are restaurants recalling their gluten free menus. People complain when they get sick and the restaurants no longer want to hold that responsibility. I don't' blame them. What once was a gesture of good will toward the Celiac community and those gluten intolerant, now is becoming a liability.

I personally believe that I hold all responsibility at a restaurant regarding what I order and put in my mouth. I am educated as to what I can safely eat and I assume all risk dining outside of my home. Although, when I order with simple, non-demanding specifics, I expect it to be served as it was ordered.

What are your thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



hermitgirl Contributor

I like the concept of a gluten free menu, but there is always the concern about cross contamination issue. My biggest thing is asking about ingredients. I spoke to the manager and the owner at a restauruant that opened a few days ago. I asked them if they have anything that was safe for someone who couldn't have anything with gluten, or wheat derivitives. Both were completely clueless, so I asked about ingredients in flavoring and seasoning, they were still clueless. Having a gluten free menu helps the servers, management, and customers decide what is considered gluten free, but you are in a restaurant. There is always a risk for cross contamination. I think it is odd that restaurants are pulling these menus, when you have places like Unos and Boston's spending a lot of money to promote their gluten free pizzas. I can understand restaurants not publicly promoting menus for special diets, but given the number of people with food allergies and special diet restrictions you would think that they would at least attempt to keep this option open. You don't see them pulling their menus for people who want to watch their calories or eat "heart healthy".

Sorry about the rambling, but the main thing is these restaurants have gone out of their way to try to serve us, there will always be a risk for contamination, and there will always be a chance for an accidental mix up. How many times did restaurants get my order wrong before I was diagnosed?

I think that it is not wrong to let a restaurant know if there was an issue, as they should be aware if there was a major problem, but being held "liable"?? I can see liability for an entire room of diners getting food poisining, but not for a one time, one diner issue. Now a restaurant that totes a menu and promotes it, but doesn't follow it, and many people regularly get sick, again, I can see that issue.

I just get frustrated that it takes so little before companies have this knee jerk response, and everyone else suffers because of something a few individuals did.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I think it really depends on where the restaurant draws the line.

If it's "here's this menu, that's all we're doing"... well, yeah, I'd rather them withdraw the menu. If the staff isn't trained, the menu is kind of worthless to me. I'm just jumping blindly off something I can't see.

If it's "here's the menu, we've trained the staff what this is, that's all we're doing"... I think I'm fine with that, but know that eating there is very much at my own risk. I'm bungee jumping all alone here.

If it's "here's the menu, we regularly remind the staff how to work with this, that's all we're doing"... I'm much more likely to go to the place. It's still my own risk, but I'm bungee jumping with people who have done it once before.

If it's "here's the menu, we regularly remind the staff how to work with this, and we've allocated kitchen space to have room to deal with contamination concerns"... I'm going to advertise the heck out of that place and frequent that place. It's STILL my own risk, but I'm now bungee jumping tandem with experts.

astyanax Rookie

who has pulled their gluten-free menus?

Lombardi25 Apprentice

I believe that Texas Roadhouse pulled there's in the last year (don't quote me on that).

I find some restaurants (like many probably do) to go above and beyond and others to be totally lazy and inept about it.

For example, 99 has gluten-free menus now online and in the restaurant, and one of the items on the gluten-free is FF's. Sometimes I go or call (for take out) and the manager will say the friolator is dedicated for just gluten-free stuff, then the next time a manager will come on and say "he can't gaurantee someone didn't throw something that's not gluten-free in there..."

I mean consistency? I think I'm about 2 for 5 now, and the 2 times make me wonder if I even got a dedicated friolator, since then I haven't even gone back, I'm sick of them. Don't put on the menu if you can't prepare it gluten-free.

Anyways, that's my rant.

In general I agree with the last post by tarna, places like Outback (as much as I'd love to see THEM get more into fun gluten-free appetizers and/or FF's) and a semi-local (even though they have some other non New England locations) such as Burton's Grill (which do buns/breads/fries/pasta gluten-free) and another place in northern NH called Rafferty's Pub, all those places go through great great strides to ensure everything is prepared gluten-free and their staff (for the most part, Outback does make me nevous sometimes based on some past experiences) are really up to snuff on the whole gluten-free thing.

I mention my nervousness about Outback, one time I did have an pretty bad experience with ordering ribs, first order came ON TOP of FF's, the next came with a dish of carmelized apples leaning against it lol (which it says NOT to order if you are gluten-free), finally after a little pow wow with the manage the third came out PERFECT (after everyone was done eating of course) and free of charge.

Oh well, that's some of my thoughts on the matter, rambled a little off topic but anyways :-) Happy gluten-free eating, and screw lazy restaurants like Applebees that don't even want to try to accomodate us lol.

lizard00 Enthusiast

I think a lot of the difference comes between restaurants that actually prepare the majority of their food on the premises, versus a place like Applebee's that takes it out of a bag and either cooks it or slaps it on a plate. A long time ago, I asked for something to be left off of a salad at Applebee's, and they replied that they couldn't because it came packaged that way.

I find I definitely stick to places that prepare their food in house, for a number of reasons. But the top two being that it is always fresher and tastes better, and the cook there actually knows and can control what goes into the food.

As to the original issue raised by Momma Goose... I assume the risk, too. There's a difference in my salad coming out with croutons while I have told them not to (that's just downright negligence) to a busy cook/chef forgetting to wash a pan or something because it's not customary for them to do so. It's a tough spot for the restaurants to be in.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Butch68
    Newest Member
    Butch68
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.