Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

2 Yr. Old Undiagnosed


Lori and Kieran

Recommended Posts

Lori and Kieran Rookie

Hi,

My two year old son has been having diarrhea since before last Christmas. I tried taking him off of dairy and juice with no improvement. We also gave him probiotics. My husband thinks it's just toddler diarrhea. He has not had a normal poop for months. My doctor gave me a referral to a GI specialist but said that my husband is most likely correct since my son is gaining weight and healthy. My husband is apposed to taking him to the GI specialist. Today I took him to the allergist regarding his egg allergy. While I was there I told her that I was suspicious of Celiac. Since she had to do bloodwork anyway, I asked her to test for Celiac. It wasn't until I got home that I remembered he should be on gluten prior to the test. I had taken him off of gluten about five days ago. Will this mess up the results? Thanks for your response.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Darn210 Enthusiast

It would have been better if he had stayed on it for the blood test . . . but my guess is that you still have a chance of a positive test.

Probably a bigger issue than the five days off gluten is that it can be hard to get a positive blood test for toddlers . . . the info that floats around this board a lot is that kids under the age of three have a pretty high chance of a false negative.

Here's my question back at you . . . have you seen any improvements since you've removed the gluten? Seems like most kids start responding pretty quickly (can't say "all" . . . I don't say "all" or "never" . . . somebody always has an exception)

Editted to add: I did a quick google search to see if I could quickly find an outside source that discusses the reliability of testing toddlers. I did not find anything in my quick search. So the info above about diagnosing a toddler should be considered anecdotal unless someone else can add an actual study/source.

Lori and Kieran Rookie

The first two days he had the first semi-formed poop that I had seen in months. Then back to the usual. He has been upset when he has to poop but that could be attributed to our recent attempts at potty training (which I have decided to give up on for the time being). Today he had a less watery poop but I wouldn't call it formed. I hope you don't mind all this poop talk. I wasn't sure how fast I should see results. Thanks for all your help.

mommida Enthusiast

I have found research on-line and was told by the ped. gastro. about the testing not being as reliable in a child under 24 months. This on-line research and testing was done almost 5 years ago ~ I never heard if newer testing was any more reliable. The reason for the unreliable results in that age group is based on the belief of a child's untried/developing immune system. My daughter had abnormal BM's during breastfeeding. I was undiagnosed at the time and still eating gluten. By the time she was trying her first "solids" she was having major problems. We were brushed off with the toddler "D" theory for too long.

LDJofDenver Apprentice

One thing you might consider is genetic testing (now or a couple years down the road), given the number of false negatives that occur with the blood test on small children.

It would show whether or not the gene for it is present.

Here's a link to 2 articles about Genetic Testing:

Open Original Shared Link disease...cScreening4.pdf

and 10 Facts About Genetic Testing:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/21567/1/Ten...ting/Page1.html

Here are a couple links to places where you can get the tests done:

www.kimballgenetics.com and www.enterolab.com

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,131
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Itsabit
    Newest Member
    Itsabit
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...