Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Saw My Gi Doc Today For Results Of Biopsy


boysmom

Recommended Posts

boysmom Explorer

Quick recap: I had a biopsy last month that showed esophagitis in the lower third of my esophagus, some gastritis in the antrum, and flattened duodenal folds. Biopsies were taken to test for h. pylori and celiac. Prior to the EGD I had cut back on bread drastically for about 18 mos. because it was giving me heartburn, and had been eating gluten-free for 8 weeks. I'd never heard of celiac disease until May, and at that point I was desperate to stop esophageal spasms so tried the diet knowing it might skew the results of the test. Response to the diet was dramatic.

The doctor's office had called the week after the test and told me the biopsy was negative for celiac sprue, but they never called with the results of the h. pylori tests. Today they told me that was negative too, and he showed me the results of the biopsy that said "patchy villous atrophy"

He did allow that *possibly* I had celiac disease and it had already begun to heal, but diagnosed it as a wheat allergy instead. Guess he didn't think it worth explaining that I had the same reaction to a balsamic vinegar that I didn't realize in time had barley malt flavoring. :P He said it's great when you can diagnose yourself and sent me on my way without any need for follow up with him again.

I liked that he listened and took my concerns seriously enough to run the tests, but the results confuse me. I thought ANY villous atrophy was positive for celiac? I will not be deliberately eating any gluten again! I'm debating the worth of doing stool or genetic testing because I suspect 4 of my 5 children may have symptoms related to celiac and 3 of them have already shown improvement with the switch in our diet. Because my oldest is planning to start college next fall and his choice is two states away, I'm concerned he may NEED the diagnosis to get ADA concessions in relation to his meal plan, but because we're already on the diet he may not be able to get the diagnosis. Has anyone had to deal with a child who was on a gluten-free diet for the parent's sake and faced this choice?

The help here has been priceless! Thank you all for being here and helping us through this process. It is a long and confusing road and I so appreciate the calm and helpful advice I've found here!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient
he showed me the results of the biopsy that said "patchy villous atrophy"

This would indicate Celiac Disease.

He did allow that *possibly* I had celiac disease and it had already begun to heal, but diagnosed it as a wheat allergy instead.

I would say that you definately have Celiac and may have begun to heal--why in the world he would diagnose a wheat allergy with this criteria is beyond me.

You are in the right place--best of luck with the diet/lifestyle and let us know how we can help :)

ang1e0251 Contributor

A "wheat allergy" causes a histamine response not villous atrophy! That wasn't too cool to tell you that. I would take my test results and get a second opinion IF you think you need it.

It's a good idea to get your future college student diagnosed as a few college students have had battles about the mandatory food programs at their schools. Starting that ball rolling sooner rather than later is a good idea. Colleges can sometimes move at the speed of mud. I would call his choice of school now and tell them that his ability to have his own kitchen and not be locked into the food program will decide whether he attends their school. If you are told they can acommodate him the way you wish, ask for it in writing and make sure it's a person with the power to make that promise.

boysmom Explorer

I know. My symptoms don't match up with wheat allergy at all, but they match a lot with celiac disease. :) amazing isn't it?

He told me that he has a wheat allergy and gets diarrhea and hives when he eats it, then told me in another part of the conversation that he just takes his burger off the bun to eat it...and he thinks they must mix some wheat into the burger because he can eat steak but often gets sick on his burger (removed from bun). DUH!! What doctor in this day and age doesn't realize the danger of cross contamination for allergens?? I'm sure the look of horror on my face convinced him I wasn't going to be taking that route myself. ;)

I can only assume one of two things were going on. Either he's blinded by his own condition (and willing to take a lot more risk with it than I am), or he was trying to make sure I have enough information to convince me to avoid wheat without giving me the diagnosis. Maybe he knows my insurance would give me grief if I had the diagnosis?? I will be seeing my primary doc again in another month or two in order to get a refill on my synthroid, so I'll be discussing this process with him too. He may be willing to make the diagnosis based on my dietary response in combination with these results. We'll see...

NewGFMom Contributor

Ask for a second opinion interpreting your results. What could it hurt?

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I know. My symptoms don't match up with wheat allergy at all, but they match a lot with celiac disease. :) amazing isn't it?

He told me that he has a wheat allergy and gets diarrhea and hives when he eats it, then told me in another part of the conversation that he just takes his burger off the bun to eat it...and he thinks they must mix some wheat into the burger because he can eat steak but often gets sick on his burger (removed from bun). DUH!! What doctor in this day and age doesn't realize the danger of cross contamination for allergens?? I'm sure the look of horror on my face convinced him I wasn't going to be taking that route myself. ;)

I can only assume one of two things were going on. Either he's blinded by his own condition (and willing to take a lot more risk with it than I am), or he was trying to make sure I have enough information to convince me to avoid wheat without giving me the diagnosis. Maybe he knows my insurance would give me grief if I had the diagnosis?? I will be seeing my primary doc again in another month or two in order to get a refill on my synthroid, so I'll be discussing this process with him too. He may be willing to make the diagnosis based on my dietary response in combination with these results. We'll see...

It sounds like your doctor is in denial about celiac himself or may not have been diagnosed yet. It is amazing how many doctors just are not informed at all about celiac. He may even at one point been tested and told he either 'doesn't have the gene' or had negative blood and/or biospy and doesn't know that both are common. Even if you don't get a diagnosis your doctor can test for the stuff he needs to test for, osteoporosis, anemias, etc.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,984
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    henrygreen
    Newest Member
    henrygreen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...