Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can I Get Diagnosed After 2 Years Gluten Free?


Tom15034

Recommended Posts

Tom15034 Newbie

Is it possible to get diagonsed with celiacs disease after being off wheat for about 1-1/2 years? Although I had an immediate black and white 100% improvement the day I quite eating wheat, I have never been diagnosed as as intolerant. After many years, I had gotten used to the burning gut after every meal and the abnormal bm's. Then I read about a celiac that had my simptoms and I tried it and the rest is history. Been a new man ever since! The medical experts I went to for years totally missed it. (What are they teaching these guys and gals?)

I have now found a GI doctor willing to do the biopsy of the small bowel. Is it too late to get a good test? If my cilli or whatever all healed back, my biopsy sample may look like a normal guys?

Tom


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

You can NOT get an accurate biopsy now...your villi in your intestines would be healed.If you have been gluten free for a year and a half you can not get an accurate blood test or biopsy.

Another test you might want to consider is an Enterolab. www.enterolab.com

They do not require you to get back on gluten unless you have been off of gluten more then 2 years I think it is...you can learn more about it on their website. This is a good test but not widely accepted by the medical community.

That is pretty much one of your only options unless you would like to get back on gluten.

You mentioned you have been off of wheat...have you been off rye,barley,and oats as well? With celiac you have to avoid not just wheat but those as well.

Lesliean Apprentice

My blood work was negative (not the whole panel though) after just 3 weeks gluten-free. I was not going to eat gluten for 3 months to get a positive biopsy. And a lot of gluten sensitive/Celiacs are negative on the biopsy. I have complete confidence in Enterolab. They say the testing will come back positive within the first 2 years and if it comes back negative to consider a gluten challenge. Check out there website at www.enterolab.com.

Tom15034 Newbie

Thanks for the replies.

I have been off everything that contains gluten. Maybe one reason to get a biopsy would be to see if I do have villi, I mean, to make sure they grew back.

I will check out Enterolab.

Thanks

Tom

FaithInScienceToo Contributor

Hi, Tom,

May I ask you why you are seeing a GI doc at this point in time? Are you having other GI symptoms that did not go away with the gluten-free diet?

Gina

  • 1 month later...
Tom15034 Newbie

Thanks for the replys!

Gina, to answer your question, I am seeing a GI doc because I can't sleep flat or I wake up with a stomach ache in an hour or two. An endoscopy showed a sliding hiatial hernia. I am trying to get that fixed surgically.

The reasons to get diagnosed gluten sensitive at this late date:

1. Wheat free is no easy diet. Why do it if I am not a celiac?

2. If I am, my kids should be tested and possibly other relatives.

3. If I am intolerant. maybe I am getting poisned occasionally.

Some examples of getting poisoned: (1) I travel to Mexico. Try asking the waitress what foods are wheat-free when she can't understand english and I don't speak spanish. (2) I bought and ate wheat-free fig newtons. After eating a handfull I read the lable and find they had barley flour as the main ingredient.

Tom

celiac3270 Collaborator

My answer to the first one would be that if you feel better without gluten, then that's raeson enough to be gluten-free...many here don't have a formal diagnosis.

The second reason makes sense, but with 1/133 having celiac in the first place, I think everyone should be tested regardless...celiac is too common and has such powerful long-term adverse effects NOT to be tested--regardless of symptoms or lack thereof. With the third, it basically comes down to how willing you are to be painstakingly careful about this--if you'd do it without knowing for sure, diagnosis isn't necessary, if you'd rather know for sure, then testing would probably be better.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ddeatley Newbie

Tom,

Some recommend doing a gluten challenge for approximately six weeks prior to doing a biopsy, but I find it difficult to purposely do damage to yourself just for the test. If you have had celiac disease for quite sometime, and if it has been severe. being gluten-free for that long would allow your villi to recover, however adults don't always recover 100% of their villi when they go gluten-free. So there may be some benefit to the biopsy anyway. The issue about your children is an important one, however I would suggest that you get a Celiac Panel or a genetic test on them first before subjecting them to a biopsy. That may be all that is needed. Certainly consult with your GI doctor first. I have been fortunate to have a really good one, and while he didn't diagnose me three years ago, this year he was much more informed about it than ever.

I too have a hiatal hernia, although not enough to need surgical intervention. That may very well be the cause of your heartburn and you should notice relief once the surgery is done. good luck with everything

Dennis

jknnej Collaborator

I'm having my biospy after 6 months gluten-free and my GI doc, who was voted best GI doctor in Phoenix, is OK doing it.

But he is also testing for H.Pylori and reflux b/c I have those symptoms as well.

But he said he will take several samples from my small intestines to test for celiac disease.

He also believes, though, from my blood that I do not have celiac disease.

I will still be gluten-free b/c I feel a LOT better than before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    2. - Mynx replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    3. - Mynx replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    4. - trents replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    5. - Mynx replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,875
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Charli.stoz09
    Newest Member
    Charli.stoz09
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
    • Mynx
      The reason that it triggers your dermatitis herpetiformis but not your celiac disease is because you aren't completely intolerant to gluten. The celiac and dermatitis herpetiformis genes are both on the same chronometer. Dermatitis herpetoformus reacts to gluten even if there's a small amount of cross contamination while celiac gene may be able to tolerate a some gluten or cross contamination. It just depends on the sensitivity of the gene. 
    • trents
      @Mynx, you say, "The reason this is believed is because the gluten protein molecule is too big to pass through the distillation process. Unfortunately, the liquid ie vinegar is cross contaminated because the gluten protein had been in the liquid prior to distillation process." I guess I misunderstand what you are trying to say but the statements in those two sentences seem to contradict one another.
    • Mynx
      It isn't a conjecture. I have gotten glitened from having some distilled white vinegar as a test. When I talked to some of my scientists friends, they confirmed that for a mall percentage of people, distilled white vinegar is a problem. The cross contamination isn't from wheat glue in a cask. While yhe gluten protein is too large to pass through the distillation process, after the distillation process, the vinegar is still cross contaminated. Please don't dismiss or disregard the small group of people who are 100^ gluten intolerant by saying things are conjecture. Just because you haven't done thr research or aren't as sensitive to gluten doesn't mean that everyone is like you. 
×
×
  • Create New...