Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg


carynanne

Recommended Posts

carynanne Rookie

I must not be understanding this correctly. Is the tranglutaminase test for antibodies to gluten? And if so, how can there be any antibodies to gluten at all in the blood stream and the patient not be considered gluten sensitive? I can understand how a higher concentration of antibodies could suggest a higher sensitivity, but if there are any antibodies at all in someone's system, doesn't that suggest that their bodies are recognizing gluten as an invader?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced
I must not be understanding this correctly. Is the tranglutaminase test for antibodies to gluten? And if so, how can there be any antibodies to gluten at all in the blood stream and the patient not be considered gluten sensitive? I can understand how a higher concentration of antibodies could suggest a higher sensitivity, but if there are any antibodies at all in someone's system, doesn't that suggest that their bodies are recognizing gluten as an invader?

The tTg test checks for the level of intestinal damage and is not a measurement of antigliadin antibodies in the blood stream. It is not linear either.....some people with very high numbers have less damage than others with lower numbers. Other autoimmune problems, linked to Celiac Disease can cause elevated tTg also, such as Hashimoto's thyroid disease, autoimmune liver disease, etc.

The correct test to check for antibodies in the blood are the AGA IgA and AGA IgG tests. The AGA stands for antigliadin. These numbers want to be as low as possible, when retesting for dietary compliance. There really is no zero expected with this test result and that's why you are given a normal range to shoot for but you want it to be, preferably, low normal. However,as long as you are in the normal range, that is good and perfectly acceptable. As gluten is such a huge part of the American food chain, it would be nearly impossible to test zero. The levels given for the normal range are not high enough to cause an autoimmune reaction and that's the key. If they did, the test would require zero as normal and that is not possible. You are exposed to gluten daily but have to ingest it or inhale a larger amount to trigger your autoimmune system.

I have retested consistently very low normal on mine and, as I am asymptomatic, I tend to believe what doctors and lab techs have told me.

psawyer Proficient

Like many tests, this one is not 100% accurate. In a perfect world it would react exclusively to the antibody it is designed to detect, but that is not the case, so a small positive can come from other sources than the gluten antibody.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,118
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Momoosa
    Newest Member
    Momoosa
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...