Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Trader Joes


virginiabeach

Recommended Posts

virginiabeach Rookie

If you even look at the packaging of the waffles in their freezer, despite the large lettering on the front of the box, they most likely at least admit, at the end of the list of ingredients, that the product is "made on equipment shared with wheat."

The official explanation, (I've called to ask), is that they are legally allowed to call the product "gluten free" if there are less than 20 parts per million of gluten in the product. I understand that this is acceptable for many, as level of toleration varies for us. This is the same answer I got from Van's and one of the other companies that produces "gluten free" waffles. Not for me. I have to be worse than "Monk" about this.

Trader Joes gluten free rolls and bread may have been produced in a gluten free facility, but it is shipped and shelved with the wheat stuff, and somehow it seems to have become contaminated -- at my favorite shop, Organic Food Depot, (organicfooddepot.com if you want to see if one is near you), there is a separate freezer for the gluten free products, and they are very careful not to store, shelve, or ship gluten free products with the wheat. Bread wrappers tend to be thin.

General Mills products, (5 flavors of Chex, so long as the words "gluten free" appear over the word "Chex" on the front of the box), are produced in a gluten free facility. I've called the number on the box and have been assured that while not all rice and corn chex are gluten free, General Mills will never put the words "gluten free" on a product that was not produced in a gluten free facilty.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Assuming you are the U.S., there are in fact no rules at all yet as to what can and can't be called gluten-free. Manufacturers most certainly are NOT required to make it in a wheat-free facility. There's no maximum parts per million yet, although the FDA most likely WILL set that at 20. AND, the FDA rules probably will NOT require that a product be made in a dedicated facility to be called gluten-free, just as there's no such requirement for other allergens.

So, the reality is that right now, as long as you don't actually purposely add gluten to a product, you can call it gluten-free. So if Trader Joe's product doesn't have wheat, rye or barley as part of the ingredients, it's considered gluten-free. And if they actually test it to below 20 ppm, they're doing a heck of a lot more than other manufacturers are right now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,990
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Anita-Gail
    Newest Member
    Anita-Gail
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...