Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Allergy Testing

SGWhiskers

By SGWhiskers
in Related Issues & Disorders

Recommended Posts

SGWhiskers Collaborator
SGWhiskers
Posted

I'm CONFUSED! I need your collective knowledge and experiences.

5 years ago, tested positive through blood tests for tree, milk, and egg allergies

1.5 years ago, tested positive for celiac

Today, skin scratch test says trees, weeds, cat allergies. The allergist says if I don't have hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, I don't have milk/egg allergies. (But I could still have intolerances and definately have celiac).

So, which kind of testing is the trump card? Blood over skin, skin over blood, or blood and skin added together?

And then allergy shots were given as an option for 3-5 years. I don't even know where to begin thinking about that.

Please share knowledge, reputable resources, personal experiences about allergy testing and allergy treatment.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


missy'smom Collaborator
missy'smom
Posted

I went through some of the same feelings a year ago with kiddo and I when we were tested through a run of the mill allergist. By the grace of God, I came across a different allergist who has helped(and is helping) sort this all out alot. Old allergist didn't believe in dietary changes unless an anaphalactic reaction presented. New allergist is up on celiac disease, runs gene tests through Prometheus labs, does skin testing but with different protocol, runs comprehensive food panels and orders a form of elimination diet followed by reintroduction for those that show skin reaction. I think he would disagree with your allergist about the eggs and milk. The old allergist put everything on at once with skin testing. I passed out and they wiped it all off so we never knew what I reacted to. New allergist routinely puddles first, then pricks for those of concern, also starts with a few at a time or certain groups and waiting and watching before proceeding. Takes longer but is better. I highly recommend finding someone like this. Hope that gives you some direction and ideas for questions to ask. Kiddo has such a big environmental allergy load and strong reaction to some things that we have gone ahead with shots. We tried environmental control and nasal rinsing but it didn't make enough of a difference. Environmental control and nasal rinsing as well as being CF gives me alot of relief from nasal irritation(not enough but I'm still a work in progress)I trust our new allergist. We're on the same page so hopeful the shots will help kiddo. In the meantime, he is on meds as well. Poor kid said his food tastes so much better now! I had tests for milk last year-blood(egg-milk subfraction) and skin-neg. but this skin test this year was pos. for casein. I know I have problems with milk-just didn't know if it was an immune reaction for sure. I don't know if all skin tests are equal and I'm sure there are different blood tests for the foods.

SGWhiskers Collaborator
SGWhiskers
Posted
  • Author

Thank you for sharing your experiences. I would love to hear from others. I don't like the hours that the allergist has for receiving shots, so I may be looking for someone else if I want to persue shots. I've eaten eggs twice now. I'm still reserving judgement on my reaction. Yum yum though. I hope your son is doing well with the shots. They don't sound like fun.

I really would love to hear from some other people about their expiences. I love getting multiple perspectives.

burdee Enthusiast
burdee
Posted

Skin tests only show how our skin reacts in contact with certain substances. Skin tests cannot diagnosed food allergies, because we do NOT put food under our skin when we eat. Only blood tests, which show whether our blood reacts to the presence of food proteins by producing antibodies, can diagnose food allergies. When we eat, we digest the food in our gastrointestinal system. Food allergies can be caused by IgE, IgG or IgA antibodies. The IgE antibodies usually cause immediate and sometimes life threatening reactions, like hives, swelling and difficulty breathing. Your second allergist may believe that all allergies are IgE or immediate reaction allergies. IgG and IgA mediated allergies are usually delayed, non-life threatening reactions to foods.

When I took the Enterolab tests for gluten intolerance, casein and soy allergy, I did a stool test, which looks for IgA antibodies to certain foods. That test diagnosed my dairy and soy allergies as well as gluten intolerance. Those test results matched my experience of excruciating intestinal cramps after eating any of those 3 foods.

2 years later I took the ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) blood test for over 100 different foods. That blood test looked for IgG and IgE antibodies. The ELISA test diagnosed my egg and cane sugar allergies which matched my negative experiences with eggs and cane sugar. A year later (after I continued to have symptoms) I took the ELISA herb and spice test which diagnosed my allergies to vanilla and nutmeg. Those results also matched my experience of gastrointestinal pain after consuming those spices.

SUE

I'm CONFUSED! I need your collective knowledge and experiences.

5 years ago, tested positive through blood tests for tree, milk, and egg allergies

1.5 years ago, tested positive for celiac

Today, skin scratch test says trees, weeds, cat allergies. The allergist says if I don't have hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, I don't have milk/egg allergies. (But I could still have intolerances and definately have celiac).

So, which kind of testing is the trump card? Blood over skin, skin over blood, or blood and skin added together?

And then allergy shots were given as an option for 3-5 years. I don't even know where to begin thinking about that.

Please share knowledge, reputable resources, personal experiences about allergy testing and allergy treatment.

VioletBlue Contributor
VioletBlue
Posted

I don't have any faith in allergy tests. The results can be open to interpretation. For me the best test is what happens when I eat something. If there's a negative reaction under different circumstances more than 3 times to any food I pay attention. My body doesn't react the exact same way to all foods, but I've gotten to know what a negative reaction feels like. I tend to think we're better off trusting and listening to our bodies than relying on tests.

missy'smom Collaborator
missy'smom
Posted

I have found the particular skin testing I had this time around to be very helpful. My allergist probably would agree that it's not the be all end all. It has given us some direction. He combines it with a dietary elimination/trial. After testing for around 80 out of 100 foods, I reacted to 26. Eliminated all of them and felt a great, unexpected improvement in digestion. My tummy felt absolutely nothing after meals! So calm. It was hard to get used to. Many people have noted that my color looks better, without knowing that I have made any changes. After keeping the reactors out for a good amount of time, we are re-introducing them one by one, one each week and noting what happens. I agree that we have to listen to and trust our bodies that's the bottom line but I'm also all for giving tests a try to give us direction so we don't have to figure everything out on our own all the time. I could never have figured out all those that I reacted to on my own and I may not have to keep all of them out but it may help me figure out which one or ones are the offenders and when I saw the list, I could see right away what was going on and it all made sense, so the overall picture wasn't just random, oddball results. All that being said, I have found it a challenge to nail down a DX for my issues with eggs(which I suspect) and dairy(which there's no question that I have, it's just a matter of why/what DX). I tried several types of tests for dairy and finally this recent skin test was the first one that was positive.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,877
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Sasha bul
    Newest Member
    Sasha bul
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      @Mynx, how long have you been gluten-free? I ask because many newly diagnosed celiacs react to many things, and often think their reactions are caused by gluten, when in fact, they are really caused by a combination of a sensitive gut due to damage, as well as additional food intolerance/leaky gut issues to other foods which may be temporary until their villi heal.
    • Scott Adams
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Many major brands of distilled vinegar in the USA, including Heinz white vinegar, are typically made from corn. In the United States, corn is a common and cost-effective raw material used in the production of distilled white vinegar. The process involves fermenting the sugars derived from corn into alcohol, which is then further fermented into acetic acid to produce vinegar. Distillation follows, which purifies the liquid and removes impurities, including any residual proteins or allergens. While the source of the vinegar (e.g., corn) is not always explicitly stated on the label, corn-derived vinegar is widely used in the food industry due to its neutral flavor and affordability. For individuals with gluten intolerance or celiac disease, distilled vinegar made from corn is generally considered safe, as the distillation process effectively removes gluten proteins. However, if you have concerns about cross-contamination or specific sensitivities, it’s always a good idea to contact the manufacturer directly to confirm the sourcing and production practices. Heinz, for example, has stated that their distilled white vinegar is gluten-free and safe for those with celiac disease, but verifying this information can provide additional peace of mind. The belief that distilled vinegar is gluten-free is rooted in the scientific understanding that gluten proteins, which are large and complex molecules, are generally too big to pass through the distillation process. Distillation involves heating a liquid to create vapor, which is then condensed back into a liquid form, leaving behind larger molecules like gluten proteins. However, the concern about cross-contamination arises from the possibility that gluten-containing ingredients may have been present in the liquid prior to distillation. While the distillation process itself is highly effective at removing gluten, the equipment used in production could potentially introduce trace amounts of gluten if not thoroughly cleaned between batches. For most individuals with gluten sensitivity or celiac disease, distilled vinegar is considered safe because the gluten content, if any, is typically below the threshold that would trigger a reaction. However, for those with extreme gluten intolerance or celiac disease, even trace amounts can cause adverse effects. This is why some individuals, like yourself, may choose to avoid commercially produced distilled vinegar and opt for alternatives like apple cider vinegar, which can be verified as gluten-free. The meticulous process of researching ingredients and preparing homemade products, such as ketchup, is indeed challenging but crucial for maintaining health and avoiding gluten exposure. It’s important to note that regulatory standards for gluten-free labeling vary by region, and in many places, products labeled "gluten-free" must contain less than 20 parts per million (ppm) of gluten, which is considered safe for the vast majority of people with celiac disease. Nonetheless, individual sensitivity levels can vary, and your approach highlights the importance of personalized dietary management for those with severe gluten intolerance.
    • Bebee
      Testing for celiac

      By Bebee · Posted

      I have been diagnosed with Microscopic Colitis (LC) for quite a few years, so I have been gluten-free and DF.  I would like to get tested for Celiac Disease because of the possibility of cross contamination and colon cancer.  And if you were hospitalized and didn't have a celiac diagnosis you could not get gluten-free food, I don't know if that is true or not.  Also because there is chance of colon cancer so I want to know if I have Celiac Disease and need to be on very restrictive diet.  The only testing I did was a sigmoid scope and Enter Lab but no gene testing.  I know I can go back to eating gluten for a few months, but I would worry you would have to stay home for the few months while getting gluten.  What other options do I have?  Should I do the gene testing?  Maybe through Entero Lab?  Any other tests?  How important is it to have Celiac diagnosed? Thank you! Barb
    • trents
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By trents · Posted

      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Mynx · Posted

      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
×
×
  • Create New...