Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results


The Glutenator

Recommended Posts

The Glutenator Contributor

Hello,

I have been having some gastrointestinal symptoms for a while now and my doctor finally ran a blood test for celiac. My initial symptoms were bloating (looked pregnant), gas, very frequent trips to the washroom, food cravings, and fatigue. As I understand it my immunoglobin levels were very high, even for celiacs (my levels were 52 and normal is less than 20 according to my doctor). I then went for a biopsy and went gluten-free immediately after that. After about 5 weeks I am feeling a lot better. The gas went away very quickly and the bloating and other GI symptoms are getting much better. My energy level is also up 110%. Imagine my shock, then, when the biopsy came back negative. My doctor said he hadn't seen this before and said the blood test almost never gave false positives. I am completely convinced I have celiac disease, especially since the sensitivity of the blood test is so high and all my symptoms are going away, but the negative biopsy was frustrating. My doctor won't officially call me a celiac without the positive biopsy, but isn't recommending a gluten challenge and second test because all my symptoms will come back. Has anyone else had a positive blood test and negative biopsy? What are your suggestions from here? Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



elle's mom Contributor

Hello,

I have been having some gastrointestinal symptoms for a while now and my doctor finally ran a blood test for celiac. My initial symptoms were bloating (looked pregnant), gas, very frequent trips to the washroom, food cravings, and fatigue. As I understand it my immunoglobin levels were very high, even for celiacs (my levels were 52 and normal is less than 20 according to my doctor). I then went for a biopsy and went gluten-free immediately after that. After about 5 weeks I am feeling a lot better. The gas went away very quickly and the bloating and other GI symptoms are getting much better. My energy level is also up 110%. Imagine my shock, then, when the biopsy came back negative. My doctor said he hadn't seen this before and said the blood test almost never gave false positives. I am completely convinced I have celiac disease, especially since the sensitivity of the blood test is so high and all my symptoms are going away, but the negative biopsy was frustrating. My doctor won't officially call me a celiac without the positive biopsy, but isn't recommending a gluten challenge and second test because all my symptoms will come back. Has anyone else had a positive blood test and negative biopsy? What are your suggestions from here? Thanks!

False negatives on biopsies are very common. It just means that there are some areas of your small intestine that aren't completely demolished and your surgeon managed to biopsy this area rather than an area that has been affected. The damage to your intestine may but patchy, but that doesn't mean you do not have celiac disease. Although with the positive dietary response, it does mean you can at least consider yourself non-celiac gluten sensitive. Your doctor should know this, if he does not then I would be apprehensive in trusting him to further manage your condition.

I would recommend the book "Healthier Without Wheat" by Dr. Stephen Wangen. It explains all about the different tests for celiac and gluten sensitivity and does a good job of differentiating between the two.

Although the biopsy is still considered the "gold standard" for the celiac diagnosis, there's nothing saying you can't just go on eating gluten free without it if it makes you feel better, it's up to you though; don't let your doctor tell you to go back on gluten. All you'd be doing by going back to gluten is waiting until it further damages your health. This is very unfortunate.

Just as a side note too, I'm not exactly sure 52 is a really high level (I've heard of some being in the 100's or even over 1000 as in my daughter's case), but that doesn't mean anything. It is true that false positives are slim to none, so I would definately not entertain that idea. It's like pregnancy, either you are or you aren't, the value of the number is irrelevant. Good luck to you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,198
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Westshad
    Newest Member
    Westshad
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Because you have significantly reduced your gluten intake over a considerable amount of time, it is likely that you will test negative on the antibody tests. However, if the $112 for the Quest test is not a burden, it wouldn't hurt to try. It tests for total IGA (to ascertain if you are IGA deficient) and tTG-IGA. If total IGA is deficient, it can result in false negatives in other IGA tests. The tTG-IGA is the single most popular test ordered by physicians. The Quest test is not a complete celiac panel by any means (refer to the linked article above) but it might be a good place to start. Personally, I think you know enough to conclude that you need to get serious about avoiding gluten, whether you have celiac disease or NCGS. Human nature being what it is, however, many people seem to need an official diagnosis of celiac disease in order to stay on the bandwagon. Otherwise, they seem to rationalize cheating on the gluten-free diet. And there is this misconception out there that NCGS is inconvenient and uncomfortable but not harmful so it's okay to cheat. The more we learn about gluten-related disorders the more they seem to not fit into our neat little black and white categories. By the way, celiac disease is not a food allergy. It is classified as an autoimmune disorder.
    • More2Learn
      These responses are all extremely helpful, ty.  Really good reminder about omega 6.  I also know I'm low in zinc; I took the zinc test where I drank it on a spoon and couldn't taste it.  To that end, I try to eat a lot of oysters.  I do think it would be a good idea to get the blood test.  Two questions: 1-  Is there any reason you wouldn't recommend that I just buy and take a test like this as a first step? 2- I've been somewhat gluten free since ~Jan 2023 (technically organic, gluten free, soy free, light on dairy).  I eat a lot of meat, vegetables, rice -- a common breakfast for me is three eggs and a sausage link, and I can't remember the last time I had a sandwich or bread.  However, because in my mind I didn't think I had an allergy, and I more was doing gluten free to avoid artificially iron-enriched foods, I do make exceptions.  I'll eat breaded calamari.  When my Dad visits, I split mozzarella sticks with him because he loves them so much.  I'll eat the "gluten sensitive" items at a restaurant and if they asked, "is cross contamination ok?",  I always said yes.  Based on that, since I never probably fully eliminated gluten, but it was significantly reduced... is that good enough to take the blood test?  Because the pain in my side gets SO bad (really sometimes I can't function, and I absolutely thought I was dying), I am hesitant to do the gluten challenge.  Would it make sense to take the test, and if it's negative, then consider doing the challenge and seeing if I can deal with eating the bread every day? Thanks again!
    • Yaya
      For me, with osteoporosis, Celiac and more than 1 heart condition, the slower, safer route is preferable.  I'm on 5 meds per day.  Too much of anything can disturb absorption of this or that. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.  I'm gone for a few days.  
    • Wheatwacked
      It took me 2015 to 2021 at 10,000 IU a day to get to 80 ng/ml. In 2019 I was still only 47 ng/ml The highest it has reached is 93.  Tested every 3 months.     While a one time massive dose can be used to quickly raise vitamin D levels, its effects only last three months.  Because vitamin D is stored in fat, an obese person would require more to raise blood level.     Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength   The point of higher vitamin D is for the mental health and immune system requirements.  Also this study included supplementing calcium.  "Research suggests that women with low levels of vitamin D have a higher risk of breast cancer. Vitamin D may play a role in controlling normal breast cell growth and may be able to stop breast cancer cells from growing." This information is provided by Breastcancer.org. https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/risk-factors/low-vitamin-d-levels Higher vitamin D levels have been consistently associated with reduced risks of colorectal cancer https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/diet/vitamin-d-fact-sheet  
    • RMJ
      You can search here for certified gluten free olive oil GFCO productfinder
×
×
  • Create New...