Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

My Son's Blood Test Is In, Is It A Done Deal?


VydorScope

Recommended Posts

VydorScope Proficient

We already strongly believed that he has celiac disease because a week of gluten-free diet sloved all his issues, but the GI doc wanted to try the blood test since the endoscopy was not "typical" of celiac disease. The blood test was taken after a week on the gluten-free diet, because we did not know the doc would want a blood test.

The doc himself is out on vaction, but I talked to his nurse and his nurse said my sons "levels were sliglhty elevated". My son is 21 months old, in case that matters. She said the doc would call me back on Tuesday when he returns.

Since the diet worked, and his levels were "slightly elevated" after a week of gluten-free, is it a done deal?

Still waiting on my blood test results....


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Tests may come back not accurate because of your childs age. When they are below 24 months old you can get false negative testings.

VydorScope Proficient

Negative? nooo... here let me try agian. :D

Endoscopy - Showed damage in the stomach consistant with a reaction to food, but nothing in the small intestin. Alone this result would have been inconsclusive.

gluten-free Diet - Showed almost miracle level of improvement. Dieheara gone, sleeping agian, no more waking up 4 hours after eating screaming in pain, etc. All symptons seem to be cleared up a week later. Off all medications.

Blood Test - "Slightly elevated levels" after being gluten-free for about a week.

Age - 21 months old, so heals very fast I would think certinly much faster then an adult.

His doctor is away on vaction till early next week. Does this sound like a done deal to y'all that he has celiac disease?

I plan to call my doc today and whine about not having my blood test back yet....

celiac3270 Collaborator

Endoscopy -- In youngsters, since they have a smaller intestine, they usually show complete intestinal damage (whereas in the longer adult intestine, it's usually in the upper and lower regions of the intestines. However, you don't need villous damage for a diagnosis--you might have caught it early enough that there was no damage or the intestine healed remarkably, or there was very little damage that was healed in that one week period.

It's inconclusive, but certainly not negative. An endoscopy can only really be taken seriously if it comes back positive--but a negative happens all the time to people that actually have celiac disease.

Blood test -- slightly elevated...that probably means in the borderline range. I think it's overall inconclusive here, but with improvement on the diet and having been on the diet through the testing, I would put her on a gluten-free diet. Some here didn't have any tests done, but feel so much better eliminating gluten, so just for that reason, be it celiac disease or a wheat allergy, they eliminated it. That's what I would suggest.

Boojca Apprentice

It's me again. Sounds to me like it's a done deal. If you aren't sure, I'd stick with gluten-free until the results come back for sure. However, keep in mind that bc your child is so young, even "slightly elevated" is important bc they are so young and haven't been ingesting gluten for years and years and years to cause serious damage like adults. Another important thing to remember is that you were gluten-free BEFORE any of these tests, and again bc kids are so young and still growing their insides heal much faster than adults so results would've been skewed by that. When my sons blood test came back positive and we set up the endoscopy appointment my doctor said not to go gluten-free even though it was only 4 days bc it would effect the results. And this guy is one of the top ped. GI's in the country, so I trust what he says.

So, I'd say you probably have your diagnosis. The most important thing, though, even if your doc says it's not celiac disease is that you have noticed remarkable turn-around since going gluten-free, and what's most important is your child's health not the "official" diagnosis. So, if it's working stick with it!

Bridget

connole1056 Rookie

My pedi Gi said NEVER go on a gluten-free diet before a concrete diagnosis of celiac disease. The reason is that if a biopsy is done on an intenstine that has healed because of a gluten-free diet the result will be a false negative. Some intestines heal much faster than others, so one cannot say going gluten-free just a short time before the biopsy will not ruin the results.Every group I have contacted claims the biopsy is the "gold standard" of tests used in diagnosing celiac disease. They all say what I just said as well. I will tell you thatmost but not all, the groups I deal with are generally located in the New England area, in case it matters to you.

Apparently many people have been told it is a waste to test a child under two. This was not what my doctors told me, and my daughter was tested very soon after birth because her sister is a celiac. My doctors did not want her suffering or damaging herself if she did have celiac disease and I certainly didn't.

I think this proves that celiac patients are like other patients who cannot get their doctors to agree. It seems both sides of the issue have merit, but if my child was having symptoms I would get a biopsy done and if it came back negative have the doctor investigate other conditions and diseases. There are many people claiming to have celiac disease simply because they feel good on a gluten-free diet. I would never trust a self-diagnosis. I am all for feeling better, don't get me wrong, but these people are doing themselves a disservice if they do not pursue other avenues. They could have other medical problems that are being overlooked and getting worse because they think the celiac disease diagnosis is correct. This happened to my nephew and it was very hard on him and his parents and all who love him. I would never want someone to suffer from anything masking as celiac disease because of a misdignosis. So although the gluten-free diet may seem the way to go PLEASE find out for certain what is causing your child's symptoms! If not celiac disease keep in mind that it could be another immune diseases. Auto-immune diseases often get "mistaken" for one another. I have one, my sister has another and one of my daughters has another and my nephew has yet another! Aren't we the healthy family? I was diagnosed first then my daughter. My sister and nephew were both thought to have celiac disease although they do not. It can be a long time getting diagnosed, but definately worth it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    2. - Mynx replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    3. - Mynx replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    4. - trents replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

    5. - Mynx replied to Leslie Clark's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      20

      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,874
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Charli.stoz09
    Newest Member
    Charli.stoz09
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
    • Mynx
      The reason that it triggers your dermatitis herpetiformis but not your celiac disease is because you aren't completely intolerant to gluten. The celiac and dermatitis herpetiformis genes are both on the same chronometer. Dermatitis herpetoformus reacts to gluten even if there's a small amount of cross contamination while celiac gene may be able to tolerate a some gluten or cross contamination. It just depends on the sensitivity of the gene. 
    • trents
      @Mynx, you say, "The reason this is believed is because the gluten protein molecule is too big to pass through the distillation process. Unfortunately, the liquid ie vinegar is cross contaminated because the gluten protein had been in the liquid prior to distillation process." I guess I misunderstand what you are trying to say but the statements in those two sentences seem to contradict one another.
    • Mynx
      It isn't a conjecture. I have gotten glitened from having some distilled white vinegar as a test. When I talked to some of my scientists friends, they confirmed that for a mall percentage of people, distilled white vinegar is a problem. The cross contamination isn't from wheat glue in a cask. While yhe gluten protein is too large to pass through the distillation process, after the distillation process, the vinegar is still cross contaminated. Please don't dismiss or disregard the small group of people who are 100^ gluten intolerant by saying things are conjecture. Just because you haven't done thr research or aren't as sensitive to gluten doesn't mean that everyone is like you. 
×
×
  • Create New...