Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Blood Test?


scootRN

Recommended Posts

scootRN Rookie

Hello! A little background on me...I have had intestinal problems for as long as I can remember. I had never had insurance, so I couldn't afford to go to a doctor to find out what was wrong. So, I did my own research.

Long story short, I was talking with a friend of mine's mom who has celiac, and I researched it further, only to find that I have pretty much every symptom I could find. I went gluten free for a while and it helped, but without a diagnosis, I found it a difficult diet to stick to.

I have just gotten a job where I have insurance, and have been seeking a diagnosis of what is wrong with me. I finally found a nurse practitioner who was willing to test me. She ran a blood test, but it came back negative. I haven't been gluten free for several months now, so I don't think that skewed the result.

She wanted to put me on an IBS medicine that would slow down peristalsis, to help control symptoms, but I feel like if I have celiac and my body is trying to get rid of the gluten, I want it to be able to do that. I told her this, and she treated me like a moron, and informed me that I do not have celiac because my blood test was negative. I pushed to get a GI referral, and she is setting that up. I hope they will do a biopsy.

My question is, is it possible to have a negative blood test, but still have celiac? At this point I just want to know what is wrong so I can work to get better.

Sorry this is so long, I am just so confused.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Hello! A little background on me...I have had intestinal problems for as long as I can remember. I had never had insurance, so I couldn't afford to go to a doctor to find out what was wrong. So, I did my own research.

Long story short, I was talking with a friend of mine's mom who has celiac, and I researched it further, only to find that I have pretty much every symptom I could find. I went gluten free for a while and it helped, but without a diagnosis, I found it a difficult diet to stick to.

I have just gotten a job where I have insurance, and have been seeking a diagnosis of what is wrong with me. I finally found a nurse practitioner who was willing to test me. She ran a blood test, but it came back negative. I haven't been gluten free for several months now, so I don't think that skewed the result.

She wanted to put me on an IBS medicine that would slow down peristalsis, to help control symptoms, but I feel like if I have celiac and my body is trying to get rid of the gluten, I want it to be able to do that. I told her this, and she treated me like a moron, and informed me that I do not have celiac because my blood test was negative. I pushed to get a GI referral, and she is setting that up. I hope they will do a biopsy.

My question is, is it possible to have a negative blood test, but still have celiac? At this point I just want to know what is wrong so I can work to get better.

Sorry this is so long, I am just so confused.

Hi, and welcome to the forum.

Did you get a printout of your blood test results? Sometimes they do not run the total serum IGA; this is a control test to make sure you are a normal IGA producer. If this reading is low it could invalidate your other results. It is always a good idea to get a copy of your test results.

That being said, there is about a 20% false negative rate on the blood tests; similar for endoscopy and biopsy. But even if you are not truly celiac, it does not mean that you do not have trouble with the ingestion of gluten. For every diagnosed celiac, there are at least two to three gluten sensitives/intolerants. And these people have the same symptoms and can have the same complications as diagnosed celiacs. Many medical professionals do not recognize this and tell their patients to eat gluten and be happy - they do not have celiac disease :o . For a lot of people it makes it harder to stick to the gluten free diet if they don't have the celiac label to pin upon themselves, but it is nevertheless just as important for them to eliminate the gluten since they are at the same risk of developing long-term complications from gluten consumption. And from your reading I am sure you are familiar with what some of those are - you do not want to go down that road.

I hope you find a GI doc who is knowledgeable about celiac disease, and if the complete celiac panel was not run initially maybe he will do that for you, as well as the endoscopy. Let us know how things turn out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,140
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Roxyanne18
    Newest Member
    Roxyanne18
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
    • Skg414228
      Correct. I’m doing both in the same go though. Thanks for clarifying before I confused someone. I’m doing a colonoscopy for something else and then they added the endoscopy after the test. 
    • trents
      It is a biopsy but it's not a colonoscopy, it's an endoscopy.
    • Skg414228
      Well I’m going on the gluten farewell tour so they are about to find out lol. I keep saying biopsy but yeah it’s a scope and stuff. I’m a dummy but luckily my doctor is not. 
    • trents
      The biopsy for celiac disease is done of the small bowel lining and in conjunction with an "upper GI" scoping called an endoscopy. A colonoscopy scopes the lower end of the intestines and can't reach up high enough to get to the small bowel. The endoscopy goes through the mouth, through the stomach and into the duodenum, which is at the upper end of the intestinal track. So, while they are scoping the duodenum, they take biopsies of the mucosal lining of that area to send off for microscopic analysis by a lab. If the damage to the mucosa is substantial, the doc doing the scoping can often see it during the scoping.
×
×
  • Create New...