Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Had My Endoscopy Today


mamarie

Recommended Posts

mamarie Rookie

The doctor told me afterwards that it showed I had acid reflux. He told me I should start taking prilosec. Also, he said there was redness somewhere else (I forget) which indicated to him a lack of good bacteria. He said he couldn't see anything that would make him think celiac. Although we are waiting on the biopsy for sure.

My question... isn't acid reflux a good indication (along with my other symptoms) of a gluten intolerance? Would lack of good bacteria also be a symptom?

This particular doctor doesn't seem convinced that gluten is my problem (even though one blood test came back stating a wheat intolerance). It's like he's looking at all these things in isolation of each other. I asked him if the above two things he found today could be causing my malabsorption issue with D, and he said no. Sooooo, why doesn't he want to get to the bottom of what might be causing it?? If my biopsy comes back and says no celiac, I have a feeling this doctor will just treat my symptoms (above) and be done with me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Heidi S. Rookie

The doctor told me afterwards that it showed I had acid reflux. He told me I should start taking prilosec. Also, he said there was redness somewhere else (I forget) which indicated to him a lack of good bacteria. He said he couldn't see anything that would make him think celiac. Although we are waiting on the biopsy for sure.

My question... isn't acid reflux a good indication (along with my other symptoms) of a gluten intolerance? Would lack of good bacteria also be a symptom?

This particular doctor doesn't seem convinced that gluten is my problem (even though one blood test came back stating a wheat intolerance). It's like he's looking at all these things in isolation of each other. I asked him if the above two things he found today could be causing my malabsorption issue with D, and he said no. Sooooo, why doesn't he want to get to the bottom of what might be causing it?? If my biopsy comes back and says no celiac, I have a feeling this doctor will just treat my symptoms (above) and be done with me.

I would be concerned too! I was fighting vitamin D deficiencies, endoscopy came back with major inflammation, poor bacteria, and acid reflux. They put me on acid reflux meds and told me to go on a high fiber diet.... I ended up in the hospital with surgery removing my gallbadder (which wasnt the problem). Month later we figured it out.. It baffles me that he thinks it is not related. Good Luck and stay strong!

gary'sgirl Explorer

My story is very similar. I had an endoscopy and after the procedure the doc told me that I had very bad inflammation and put me on an antacid. When the results came back it did verify Celiac. It seems to me that a very high percentage of people with gluten problems have acid reflux.

Interestingly enough, I also had my gallbladder out a couple of months later too. I think that gallbladder problems may also be connected with gluten problems. Infact I'm pretty sure that before I had my gallbladder out, whenever I would get glutened I would have a gal-attack.

I also am having problem with bacterial overgrowth - I think all this stuff is definetly related. If your labs come back normal, you should still consider going gluten free and maybe finding another doctor, because your doc may just be out of ideas and not know a lot about this sort of stuff.

Let us know what happens when you get your results back.

Sarah

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Your doctor can't tell just by looking and I do hope he took a few biopsies from different areas. Since you are done with testing you can start a trial of the diet today. Your body may give you the answers before you even go back for the test results.

mamarie Rookie

He did say he took samples from a few different areas. He made it seem though that he could tell a lot by just looking at the picture, pretty much diagnosing me negative right there. I don't like this doctor, can you tell? :) I'm going to start gluten free on my own despite the results anyway, so in a way I guess it doesn't matter much. It's just frustrating!!

Your doctor can't tell just by looking and I do hope he took a few biopsies from different areas. Since you are done with testing you can start a trial of the diet today. Your body may give you the answers before you even go back for the test results.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,141
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Roxyanne18
    Newest Member
    Roxyanne18
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
    • Skg414228
      Correct. I’m doing both in the same go though. Thanks for clarifying before I confused someone. I’m doing a colonoscopy for something else and then they added the endoscopy after the test. 
    • trents
      It is a biopsy but it's not a colonoscopy, it's an endoscopy.
    • Skg414228
      Well I’m going on the gluten farewell tour so they are about to find out lol. I keep saying biopsy but yeah it’s a scope and stuff. I’m a dummy but luckily my doctor is not. 
    • trents
      The biopsy for celiac disease is done of the small bowel lining and in conjunction with an "upper GI" scoping called an endoscopy. A colonoscopy scopes the lower end of the intestines and can't reach up high enough to get to the small bowel. The endoscopy goes through the mouth, through the stomach and into the duodenum, which is at the upper end of the intestinal track. So, while they are scoping the duodenum, they take biopsies of the mucosal lining of that area to send off for microscopic analysis by a lab. If the damage to the mucosa is substantial, the doc doing the scoping can often see it during the scoping.
×
×
  • Create New...