Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Cholesterol Numbers Still Dropping


coffeetime

Recommended Posts

coffeetime Explorer

I have been gluten free for 6 months now and it is going really well. I just had repeat blood work done and had been warned that my low cholesterol numbers would probably rise after being on the diet for awhile. All the blood work came back great, including those related to my anemia, except cholesterol which dropped even more my triglycerides are now less than 45 (my doctor said the lab will not give specific scores lower than 45 because they are not reliable) and my overall cholesterol dropped to 130. Has anyone else had this problem? I'm on several types of vitamins and have managed to have only a couple of incidents when I was unknowingly exposed to gluten. Could I still be suffering from malnutrition? My doctor was surprised but not concerned about the drop so should I not worry at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

low cholesterol is a good thing....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WheatChef Apprentice

You do need cholesterol for hormonal balance and proper cellular growth but you don't need all that much. If your doctor isn't concerned about your low cholesterol you probably don't need to be either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

Very low cholesterol can be a problem. You are however are still okay according to the Mayo Clinic. The bold was added by me.

"Ideally, keep your total cholesterol below 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), or 5.2 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), and your LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jestgar Rising Star

Very low cholesterol can be a problem. You are however are still okay according to the Mayo Clinic.

I'm curious if you know anything more about this. I vaguely remember trying to research very low cholesterol one time and couldn't find any studies on it. I wonder if the cholesterol itself is the problem, or the fact that it marks a much more severe issue - like malabsorption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
coffeetime Explorer

Very low cholesterol can be a problem. You are however are still okay according to the Mayo Clinic. The bold was added by me.

"Ideally, keep your total cholesterol below 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), or 5.2 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), and your LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

I wonder if the cholesterol itself is the problem, or the fact that it marks a much more severe issue - like malabsorption.

I believe it is the malabsorption that causes those low levels in us. In my case at least. Once I started absorbing nutrients again my levels became normal. I would personally like to slap the doctors who congratulated me on my low levels prediagnosis without listening to what my diet really was. They should have looked for the cause as the way I used to eat, prediagnosis, was so loaded with fat that my numbers should have been sky high not in the cellar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



coffeetime Explorer

I believe it is the malabsorption that causes those low levels in us. In my case at least. Once I started absorbing nutrients again my levels became normal. I would personally like to slap the doctors who congratulated me on my low levels prediagnosis without listening to what my diet really was. They should have looked for the cause as the way I used to eat, prediagnosis, was so loaded with fat that my numbers should have been sky high not in the cellar.

I understand the slapping part, the doctor who refused to test me for celiac used those numbers (along with my weight) to point out to me that I was too healthy to worry about being tested. How long did it take you to start absorbing nutrients again? I stick with fruits, veg, and meats about 98% of the time. The only specialty foods (or packaged foods) I use are gluten-free oats, Chex, Van's Waffles, and Kinnikinnick Pizza crust (and these products I use less than one time a week each) I have lost about 12 lbs, but I think this is due to the fact I'm not hitting the doughnut and cake section anymore :)If my numbers continue to decrease (my dr. wants to check again in 6 mo)do you think further allergy testing would be needed? Also have you tried any type of food combining diet to help with absorption? Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jestgar Rising Star

I would personally like to slap the doctors who congratulated me on my low levels prediagnosis without listening to what my diet really was.

<snort>

My boss is an MD who's dad is a diagnosed Celiac. Boss was denied life insurance because his cholesterol was too low. Did he stop eating gluten? Nope. No symptoms = no problem. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

I understand the slapping part, the doctor who refused to test me for celiac used those numbers (along with my weight) to point out to me that I was too healthy to worry about being tested. How long did it take you to start absorbing nutrients again? I stick with fruits, veg, and meats about 98% of the time. The only specialty foods (or packaged foods) I use are gluten-free oats, Chex, Van's Waffles, and Kinnikinnick Pizza crust (and these products I use less than one time a week each) I have lost about 12 lbs, but I think this is due to the fact I'm not hitting the doughnut and cake section anymore :)If my numbers continue to decrease (my dr. wants to check again in 6 mo)do you think further allergy testing would be needed? Also have you tried any type of food combining diet to help with absorption? Thank you.

I didn't use any special diet to increase absorption but that doesn't mean that it wouldn't help. I just don't know anything about it.

One thing I would suggest, since your numbers are still dropping is to delete the gluten-free oats for a bit. Some of us do tolerate them but some of us don't. Could you drop them for a while and see if it helps?

It sounds like you are doing the right things, food wise, as in eating mostly unprocessed whole foods. That will help you heal. If you are still symptomatic then do consider dropping soy and dairy, if you haven't already.

Allergy testing is of little value unless you are having histamine reactions like hives. The reason I say that is because celiac is not an allergy and intolerances like to gluten, dairy, soy, eggs, yeast etc will not show up in allergy testing. You may, if you are still symptomatic, want to try dropping the most common cointolerances like the ones I mentioned and see if it helps. You could also consider doing Enterolab testing for antibodies to those items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frieze Community Regular

I believe it is the malabsorption that causes those low levels in us. In my case at least. Once I started absorbing nutrients again my levels became normal. I would personally like to slap the doctors who congratulated me on my low levels prediagnosis without listening to what my diet really was. They should have looked for the cause as the way I used to eat, prediagnosis, was so loaded with fat that my numbers should have been sky high not in the cellar.

chol. testing should be done fasting, so the major effect of diet is eliminated...the liver manufactures chol. too little can cause many issues, i am not aware of what the underlying cause would be, though i would suspect malnutrition/liver disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roda Rising Star

Around 6 years or so ago I had a lipid panel done. Never had one done before. Total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides were all low. My triglyceride level was the lowest and it was 4. I had a doctor tell me they had never seen a level so low before and that I was "lucky". The only thing they recommended was to try and raise my HDL. After I was diagnosed I found some information (very limited) on low triglycerides as a sign of malabsorption. I just had another lipid panel done in April to see where everything was. WOW! Everything is normal now! I still need to raise my HDL but everthing else is normal now. I had it done because I feared that now that I am absorbing, that I would go the other way. My mom has high cholesterol and so did her mother. Mom was on meds for it until this year. She has lowered it enough with lifestyle/diet changes that her doctor took her off of it and she is doing great. My father and brother have very low numbers as well. HMM, both in denial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,640
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lamiller1028
    Newest Member
    lamiller1028
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • marip
      It was 1 short episode at night.  I was fine eating my dinner several hours before this.
    • trents
      Many celiacs are what we call "silent". That is, they don't have classic GI symptoms but begin developing other medical problems such as you describe with your husband.  Also, it is unfortunate that many doctors, and in some cases their hands are tied by stingy healthcare system protocols, do bare minimum testing for celiac disease which would consists of a single test known as the tTG-IGA. This may be the best single test for celiac disease (and inexpensive) but in reality it can miss some who actually do have celiac disease for a variety of reasons, including being IGA deficient. The tTG-IGA should never be ordered apart from the "total IGA" test (for IGA deficiency). There are also other IGA celiac antibody tests available and there are several IGG antibody tests available and a full celiac panel would include all of these. Makes me wonder if when you were tested at 20 if the results would have been different if a full panel had been ordered. Here is an article outlining celiac disease blood antibody testing:   
    • sh00148
      Thank you. Yes I’d looked into both of these causes. My only thoughts on a triggering event were when my daughter was born and she had breathing difficulties so was in NICU.    It’s all quite fascinating. My husband shows signs of celiac. Low immune system, b12 deficiency, peeling skin and more recently severe and intermittent allergic rhinitis.    We will all get testing, I’m sure. 
    • trents
      Even though you were tested for celiac disease at 20 and it was negative, you can develop celiac disease at any stage of life. Developing active celiac disease requires to elements.  The first element is the genetic potential. There have been two primary genes connected to the development of celiac disease, HLDQ 2 and HLDQ 8, and some secondary variant genes. About 40% of the population possess one or more of these two genes or their variants but only about 1% of the population ever develops active celiac disease. So, having the genetic potential is insufficient as a standalone diagnostic measure. But not having the genetic potential can be used to rule out celiac disease. Which brings me to the second element: The second element is some kind of triggering stress event that turns the celiac genes on such that the latent potential is activated. It can be a viral illness, a prolonged emotional/psychological stress event or almost anything. This is kind of the mystery part of the process. So, in science this is known as epigenetics or how genetic potential is influenced by external factors. So, most who have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease never do because the sufficient external triggering stimulus doesn't happen. There is something else you should be aware of regarding gluten disorders and that is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten from your life is the antidote for both.
    • RMJ
      I have long hair and tend to get it in my mouth so I make sure there are no gluten ingredients in my shampoo.  I don’t worry about something that just goes on my skin, away from my mouth.
×
×
  • Create New...