Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does This Sound Like The Right Testing For Dh?


climbmtwhitney

Recommended Posts

climbmtwhitney Apprentice

Hi All,

My already gluten-free DS has been getting awful rashes on elbows, back of neck, sometimes above knees too. They're very infrequent--about every few months sometimes six months or longer. Perhaps when he is being accidentally glutened. I have Celiac and my son is gluten intolerant. So, I'm wondering if he is actually Celiac as well and getting DH. From my research the rashes resemble DH in every respect. Took him to an allergist and did full skin testing. Nothing turned up. She suggested a dermatologist to look for DH or something else. Did that. He said he would do 2 biopsies on the next rash. The 1st to look under a microscope and see if the visual is consistent with DH. Then, if so, do a 2nd biopsy to check for the antibodies. Well, we did the 1st biopsy and just got the results. The visual looks like eczema. So no 2nd biopsy. Since when is eczema super infrequent and painful (brings him to tears)? Hmmm.

My questions....Can you tell if something is DH with a visual only? Or do we need a new doctor and a antibody biopsy? Has anyone else had a doctor insist on a visual look only first?

I'd really appreciate some insight. Thanks!!!

Jillian


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

I have never heard of a procedure to look at the lesion itself. Common practice is to look for the antibodies in the skin adjacent to the lesion. Of course, some doctors don't know this and biopsy the lesion itself thinking this is the way to do it :P As for doing both, this is the first I ever heard of it. Jestgar might know if there are any changes observable in the skin itself that indicate DH, but it would sure be news to me. If there were, why do the other biopsy?

RoseTapper Newbie

I recently read on another thread that DH is a form of eczema.....maybe you should research that angle and challenge your doctor. To properly diagnose DH, the test DOES involve testing skin NEXT to the lesion. If the dermatologist doesn't know this, he needs to be informed (there's adequate literature on this that you can show him).

ChemistMama Contributor

I recently read on another thread that DH is a form of eczema.....maybe you should research that angle and challenge your doctor. To properly diagnose DH, the test DOES involve testing skin NEXT to the lesion. If the dermatologist doesn't know this, he needs to be informed (there's adequate literature on this that you can show him).

DH is similar to excema, but in the case of DH we actually know what causes it and what part of the immune system is involved. Not only does your Dr. need to biopsy next to the lesion, he has to do a direct immunofluorecence assay, which not many labs do. HEre is a link to print and show the doctor. Do not put your son on a gluten-free diet until he is properly diagnosed.

Open Original Shared Link

Here's a link to a lab who says they do this type of assay:

Open Original Shared Link

climbmtwhitney Apprentice

Thanks for the replies! Appreciate it!

My son is already gluten free. Has been for almost 2 years because he's gluten intolerant. But, now we think he might be Celiac like myself and my dd. The rash is very infrequent, but very severe. So, we (and his allergist) are thinking it's when he's glutened by mistake. I found a new dermatologist and registered my son. Now I just need to (gulp.) induce gluten and see if the rash appears. If so, I know we have our answer even without the test. But, I will go ahead and get another biopsy for a written diagnosis.

The first dermatologist makes me furious! :angry: Super arrogant. Usually the arrogant ones are the ones who haven't a clue what they're talking about. Figures. <_< Seems most everyone here in northern California uses UCSF lab for this stuff. Hopefully they can run the immunofluorecence assay properly. I knew we needed that. I just wanted to double check before I put my son thru another biopsy. He showed everyone at school his stitches. Poor little guy.

Thanks so much for the links. They actually mention how far away the skin sample needs to be from the lesions. So helpful!

Jillian

ChemistMama Contributor

Thanks for the replies! Appreciate it!

My son is already gluten free. Has been for almost 2 years because he's gluten intolerant. But, now we think he might be Celiac like myself and my dd. The rash is very infrequent, but very severe. So, we (and his allergist) are thinking it's when he's glutened by mistake. I found a new dermatologist and registered my son. Now I just need to (gulp.) induce gluten and see if the rash appears. If so, I know we have our answer even without the test. But, I will go ahead and get another biopsy for a written diagnosis.

Jillian-

After being gluten-free two years, the fluorecence test probably won't be useful, I'm afraid! After 2 years there isn't enough gluten built up in his skin, and unless it's a very new lesion, I have a feeling the test will come back negative. To get enough gluten, you'd have to have him eat gluten for about 4 weeks (!). This is what happenned to me, I was only gluten-free two months and the test was negative (done properly). He talked to someone in Dr. Fasano's Celiac clinic (U Maryland)and they said challenge 4-6 weeks. I didn't make it one day the pain was so bad.

If he's glutened by mistake, and you see lesions, you may want to try the iodine patch test, search the boards and you'll find it. Place a bandaid with the pad soaked in topical iodine near an active lesion. Leave it there as long as he can stand it, or 24 hours. If he has celiac the place where the patch is will be red and irritated and may even blister. That's proof he does have DH. HOwever, unless there's gluten in his system it won't work, and an accidental glutening may not even be enough, but it's something to try.

climbmtwhitney Apprentice

Jillian-

After being gluten-free two years, the fluorecence test probably won't be useful, I'm afraid! After 2 years there isn't enough gluten built up in his skin, and unless it's a very new lesion, I have a feeling the test will come back negative. To get enough gluten, you'd have to have him eat gluten for about 4 weeks (!). This is what happenned to me, I was only gluten-free two months and the test was negative (done properly). He talked to someone in Dr. Fasano's Celiac clinic (U Maryland)and they said challenge 4-6 weeks. I didn't make it one day the pain was so bad.

If he's glutened by mistake, and you see lesions, you may want to try the iodine patch test, search the boards and you'll find it. Place a bandaid with the pad soaked in topical iodine near an active lesion. Leave it there as long as he can stand it, or 24 hours. If he has celiac the place where the patch is will be red and irritated and may even blister. That's proof he does have DH. HOwever, unless there's gluten in his system it won't work, and an accidental glutening may not even be enough, but it's something to try.

ChemistMama,

Oh, I was afraid of that! I searched everywhere to try and figure out if you will still test positive after you've been gluten-free for awhile. Darn. We are still going to induce gluten next Sunday. We've got a week that's not too crazy so he won't be missing anything if he's miserable. I really hate doing it, but I'm quite sure it's the cause of his rash and we want an answer. We know that if he breaks out in the rash, it's Celiac, regardless of what the biopsy shows. He's already been extensively tested by his allergist, he has the genes, and tested as gluten intolerant. He also gets bad headaches and leg pains from gluten. Yep, feeling guilty already, but it's important to know. Thanks again for the help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,929
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    quinnmac
    Newest Member
    quinnmac
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      The first set of results show two positive results for celiac disease, so at the very least it looks like you could have it, or at the least NCGS.   Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.      
    • Scott Adams
      Elevated tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) levels are highly specific for celiac disease, and they are a key biomarker used in its diagnosis. However, there are some rare instances where elevated tTG-IgA levels have been reported in conditions other than celiac disease. While these cases are not common, they have been documented in the literature. Below are some examples and references to studies or reviews that discuss these scenarios:  1. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS)    - NCGS typically does not cause elevated tTG-IgA levels, as it is not an autoimmune condition. However, some individuals with NCGS may have mild elevations in tTG-IgA due to intestinal inflammation or other factors, though this is not well-documented in large studies.    - Reference: Catassi, C., et al. (2013). *Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: The New Frontier of Gluten-Related Disorders*. Nutrients, 5(10), 3839–3853. [DOI:10.3390/nu5103839](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5103839)  2. Autoimmune Diseases    - Elevated tTG-IgA levels have been reported in other autoimmune conditions, such as type 1 diabetes, autoimmune hepatitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This is thought to be due to cross-reactivity or polyautoimmunity.    - Reference: Sblattero, D., et al. (2000). *The Role of Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase in the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease*. Autoimmunity Reviews, 1(3), 129–135. [DOI:10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00022-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00022-3)  3. Chronic Liver Disease    - Conditions like chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis can sometimes lead to elevated tTG-IgA levels, possibly due to increased intestinal permeability or immune dysregulation.    - Reference: Vecchi, M., et al. (2003). *High Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Role for Gluten-Free Diet?* Gastroenterology, 125(5), 1522–1523. [DOI:10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.031](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.031)  4. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)    - Some patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis may have elevated tTG-IgA levels due to intestinal inflammation and damage, though this is not common.    - Reference: Walker-Smith, J. A., et al. (1990). *Celiac Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease*. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 10(3), 389–391. [DOI:10.1097/00005176-199004000-00020](https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-199004000-00020)  5. Infections and Parasites    - While infections (e.g., giardiasis) are more commonly associated with false-positive tTG-IgA results, chronic infections or parasitic infestations can sometimes lead to elevated levels due to mucosal damage.    - Reference: Rostami, K., et al. (1999). *The Role of Infections in Celiac Disease*. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 11(11), 1255–1258. [DOI:10.1097/00042737-199911000-00010](https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199911000-00010)  6. Cardiac Conditions    - Rarely, heart failure or severe cardiovascular disease has been associated with elevated tTG-IgA levels, possibly due to gut ischemia and increased intestinal permeability.    - Reference: Ludvigsson, J. F., et al. (2007). *Celiac Disease and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study*. American Heart Journal, 153(6), 972–976. [DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019)  Key Points: - Elevated tTG-IgA levels are highly specific for celiac disease, and in most cases, a positive result strongly suggests celiac disease. - Other conditions causing elevated tTG-IgA are rare and often accompanied by additional clinical findings. - If celiac disease is suspected, further testing (e.g., endoscopy with biopsy) is typically required for confirmation. If you’re looking for more specific studies, I recommend searching PubMed or other medical databases using terms like "elevated tTG-IgA non-celiac" or "tTG-IgA in non-celiac conditions." Let me know if you’d like help with that!
    • MaryMJ
      I called zero water and they state their filters do not contain gluten or gluten containing ingredients. 
    • trents
      I agree. Doesn't look like you have celiac disease. Your elevated DGP-IGG must be due to something else. And it was within normal at that after your gluten challenge so it is erratic and doesn't seem to be tied to gluten consumption.
    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
×
×
  • Create New...