Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I Really Need To Get A Biopsy?


jbaker

Recommended Posts

jbaker Newbie

After many years of feeling terrible and not getting any substantial guesses from doctors I read up on Celiac and asked to be tested. First there was one blood test, Doc said it "looked like I had a possible sensitivity to gluten." So I went gluten free for a couple weeks, I was feeling really improved but finding the food very costly. So I wanted a more certain answer, again asking the Doc to do further tests. Four more blood tests came back "positive." So now they want to do a biopsy...is there really a need for this? The gluten I had to ingest for the second round of blood tests made me terribly ill. I feel like I am fairly positive I have Celiac. Can anyone tell me the benefit of getting the biopsy. It feels a bit silly to have a surgery when all the other signs are fairly definite.

Thanks for your help.

Oh, and has anyone else seen anxiety attacks lessen on a gluten free diet?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RoseTapper Newbie

I can share with you what Dr. Alessio Fasano, a leading celiac expert, presented at the celiac conference at Stanford last month. He said that there are five tests for celiac: 1) positive blood tests, 2) positive gene test, 3) symptoms were present before going gluten free, 4) the symptoms resolved upon eating a gluten-free diet, and 5) biopsy. He explained that if a patient is positive for four of the five tests, that is adequate. Because biopsies are notoriously imprecise due to inexperience of either/both the surgeon and the pathologist, Dr. Fasano suggests that the biopsy should be the test that can be skipped. He and several colleagues will be publishing an article to this effect within the next month or so.

Unless your insurance company requires a definite diagnosis, I personally see no reason for having a biopsy. If your symptoms are alleviated by a gluten-free diet, that's all you really need to know. There are many people who would disagree with me on this matter, but this is the stance I have taken after attending numerous conferences on celiac and gluten sensitivity.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

I can't think of any advantage to getting a biospy with multiple positive blood tests. Maybe the experts here will chime in a reason why, though.

As far as the anxiety attacks, I'm not completely sure, but I might have been having anxiety attacks. They may have been asthma attacks or anxiety attacks. Sometimes I would go into a public place like a store and just start having difficulty breathing. I've had asthma since I was a child, but for about a year it was worse than it had ever been before. I was having frequent sinus infections and seasonal allergies, so I thought maybe that was making my asthma worse, but sometimes my inhaler did not help me. I would feel panicky because I couldn't breath. I would have to leave my groceries or whatever I was shopping for and retreat to my car and sit for a while before I felt better. A lot of times i couldn't go back and finish shopping. The strange thing is that it never happened when I was at home. Only when I was in a crowded public place. And once when I was in a car with my husband--we were driving out in the country and got lost (he was driving). For some reason I freaked out and couldn't breath. I haven't had one of those episodes since Christmas 2009 (Started gluten-free/elimination diet in Jan 2010). I also have not had any sinus infections and much lighter allergies this year. So I do think the gluten free diet has helped.

bluebonnet Explorer

first, i have definitely noticed a difference in anxiety levels ... for the better of course!

second, if you do the biopsy you will need to eat gluten again (which is what i did and it was awful and i feel like i reversed progress) BUT having the endoscopy revealed a couple other problems i was unaware of. if you feel like other issues are worth checking into and you have a great doctor than its certainly an option to think about. many people here had the biopsy and came back negative but they really do have celiac ... since you've been off gluten it could give you a false negative. you just have to decide how you will handle those results should they come up negative but to me it sounds like you've got your answer regarding celiac.

good luck! :)

jbaker Newbie

Thanks to all for your posts, very helpful. I think the biopsy is a no-go for me right now. Now I am curious and should probably search but GLUTEN has made me lazy, can someone explain the difference between gluten free diet and gluten/elimination diet?

Thanks again, it's great to be with people who don't just think I decided to hate bread!

Jane

1138 Newbie

I had a biopsy done last month. It was the easiest thing. A lot of people seem to be concerned with getting one. It's not really surgery. I don't find it to be invasive. But that's just me. The main reason was I had symptoms for what I thought was an ulcer all these years. So naturally I decided to get a gastroscopy done plus my brother was diagnosed with celiac months before. So I wanted to knock out both. Turns out it wasn't an ulcer at all. Just celiac. The biopsy took 30 minutes. 15 minutes for the scope to look around and 15 minutes for me to wake up. My throat wasn't scratchy or sore at all. I felt perfect. I'm glad I had the scope. Just looking at my lower intestine he could tell right off the bat there was damage consistant with celiac. The biopsy confirmed celiac. I felt better being able to see the amount of damage done to my villi (photo) so I had a better idea of what I was dealing with. He then followed it with a blood test where my tissue transglutaminase was off the charts.

Also your grocery bill can be tax deductible. Open Original Shared Link

bluebonnet Explorer

Thanks to all for your posts, very helpful. I think the biopsy is a no-go for me right now. Now I am curious and should probably search but GLUTEN has made me lazy, can someone explain the difference between gluten free diet and gluten/elimination diet?

Thanks again, it's great to be with people who don't just think I decided to hate bread!

Jane

i don't believe there is a difference between the two. if i'm wrong, someone let me know please and thank you. :)

to me its just a different way to say eliminate every spec of gluten from your diet. make sure to remember that cross contamination could be a source as well. it doesn't have to be a whole bite of something with gluten.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bluebonnet Explorer

I had a biopsy done last month. It was the easiest thing. A lot of people seem to be concerned with getting one. It's not really surgery. I don't find it to be invasive. But that's just me. The main reason was I had symptoms for what I thought was an ulcer all these years. So naturally I decided to get a gastroscopy done plus my brother was diagnosed with celiac months before. So I wanted to knock out both. Turns out it wasn't an ulcer at all. Just celiac. The biopsy took 30 minutes. 15 minutes for the scope to look around and 15 minutes for me to wake up. My throat wasn't scratchy or sore at all. I felt perfect. I'm glad I had the scope. Just looking at my lower intestine he could tell right off the bat there was damage consistant with celiac. The biopsy confirmed celiac. I felt better being able to see the amount of damage done to my villi (photo) so I had a better idea of what I was dealing with. He then followed it with a blood test where my tissue transglutaminase was off the charts.

Also your grocery bill can be tax deductible. Open Original Shared Link

wow, had no clue that some things can be tax deductible! thanks for the link. :)

Kelly&Mom Rookie

After my daughter's positive biopsy, our pediatrician/gastro recommended the rest of the family be tested but said that since Kelly's biopsy was positive, a positive blood test for the rest of us was sufficient, no biopsy needed. After my positive blood test, I went to see an adult gastro. and after going through my family history, he recommended one so that he would have a baseline for how things looked in there. My mom died of a celiac related cancer (she wasn't ever diagnosed but had gastro issues all her life)so I agreed. As an adult, he said I didn't need to go back to eating gluten before the biopsy because there would still be damage there, I even waited 2 mos. until school let out for the summer so as to not have to use sick days. I've had several surgeries and this biopsy was really nothing like that at all other than the IV. Very quick, painless, no side effects other than sleepy for a day.

If you don't have a family history of cancer, etc. you are probably fine w/out the biopsy.

Fey Rookie

I can't think of any advantage to getting a biospy with multiple positive blood tests. Maybe the experts here will chime in a reason why, though.

As far as the anxiety attacks, I'm not completely sure, but I might have been having anxiety attacks. They may have been asthma attacks or anxiety attacks. Sometimes I would go into a public place like a store and just start having difficulty breathing. I've had asthma since I was a child, but for about a year it was worse than it had ever been before. I was having frequent sinus infections and seasonal allergies, so I thought maybe that was making my asthma worse, but sometimes my inhaler did not help me. I would feel panicky because I couldn't breath. I would have to leave my groceries or whatever I was shopping for and retreat to my car and sit for a while before I felt better. A lot of times i couldn't go back and finish shopping. The strange thing is that it never happened when I was at home. Only when I was in a crowded public place. And once when I was in a car with my husband--we were driving out in the country and got lost (he was driving). For some reason I freaked out and couldn't breath. I haven't had one of those episodes since Christmas 2009 (Started gluten-free/elimination diet in Jan 2010). I also have not had any sinus infections and much lighter allergies this year. So I do think the gluten free diet has helped.

Those sound a lot like my anxiety attacks. When they were really bad, I couldn't go into stores without getting the racing heart/difficulty breathing. I also had them in my car, which is why I stopped driving for almost 2 years. Then I began having them as a passenger, out of the blue.

My anxiety has dropped about 80% since starting the gluten-free diet 2 weeks ago. The fact my anti-anxiety meds are not gluten-free isn't helping either, but I'm getting a gluten-free brand in 2 days :D

Skylark Collaborator

As Kelly&Mom mentioned, with all the positive blood tests you want to be sure there are no precancerous changes to the gastric mucosa. If you had anti-tTG and anti-endomysial antibodies, and you're unable to eat gluten there is really no question that you're either celiac or headed in that direction. You could be in an intermediate state where you have positive blood tests but not much mucosal damage but you have already decided you need to be on a celiac diet.

Talk to your doctor about how sick gluten makes you and ask if he can see what he needs on biopsy without you consuming gluten.

Yes, I had anxiety attacks lessen on a gluten-free diet and they return if I consume gluten. For complete mental health I personally need a pretty high-powered vitamin/micronutrient/mineral supplement as well as staying gluten-free.

A classic allergy elimination diet is when you eat a very limited selection of foods for a few weeks (lamb, rice, and pears for example) and then reintroduce foods one at a time.

Midwest Newbie

If you've been off gluten for a few months, what does a blood test measure and how effective is it at that point?

ravenwoodglass Mentor

If you've been off gluten for a few months, what does a blood test measure and how effective is it at that point?

The blood test measures the antibodies that are produced from the gluten reaction. If you have been off gluten for months you need to do a gluten challenge for aoubt 3 months for any chance of an accurate result. Even with a challenge or on a full gluten diet there is a 20% chance of a false negative.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Thanks to all for your posts, very helpful. I think the biopsy is a no-go for me right now. Now I am curious and should probably search but GLUTEN has made me lazy, can someone explain the difference between gluten free diet and gluten/elimination diet?

Thanks again, it's great to be with people who don't just think I decided to hate bread!

Jane

Sorry I just noticed this question. An elimination diet is where you eat only a few whole foods that you are pretty sure are not bothering you. Then you add new foods in one at a time to see how you react. I had blood sugar issues so I did my elimination diet by cutting out all grains, all sugar except for small amts of honey, anything that converts easily to sugar (corn and potatoes), all fruits except for berries, all dairy, yeast, all forms of soy and of course anything with gluten. I ate organic chicken, bison, lamb and a few veggies (peas, carrots, onions, garlic) and used only olive oil for one month. Then I added things in one food at a time to see how I felt.

Midwest Newbie

...If you have been off gluten for months you need to do a gluten challenge for aboubt 3 months for any chance of an accurate result...

You mean eat food with gluten in it for 3 months? No way in heck that's gonna happen!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...