Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Walk-In Clinic Doctor


Coinkey

Recommended Posts

Coinkey Apprentice

Alright. I finally went to the walk-in clinic doctor about my gluten free discovery, hoping he'd do a test to formally diagnose Celiac. He just said, "so there are no more symptoms now that you don't eat gluten? Great, keep doing that." He gave me a sheet to go get tested at a lab for a whole list of things but never explained why he was testing for those things. I was hoping someone here could try and enlighten me on why these tests would be done:

CBC, routine urine analysis, electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, CO2), Albumin, alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Bilirubin- total only, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, ferritin, glucose-random, GGT, Hemoglobin A1c, Lipase, Magnesium, Phosphate, Protein- Total, Thyroid (TSH and Free thyroxine), B12 and Vitamin D, E5R and something in doctor writing that starts with tissue tromglutaSCRIBBLE.

I am guessing they are all something to do with nutrition. I really wish that doctor would have been easier to talk to and explain stuff to me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



burdee Enthusiast

Alright. I finally went to the walk-in clinic doctor about my gluten free discovery, hoping he'd do a test to formally diagnose Celiac. He just said, "so there are no more symptoms now that you don't eat gluten? Great, keep doing that." He gave me a sheet to go get tested at a lab for a whole list of things but never explained why he was testing for those things. I was hoping someone here could try and enlighten me on why these tests would be done:

CBC, routine urine analysis, electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, CO2), Albumin, alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Bilirubin- total only, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, ferritin, glucose-random, GGT, Hemoglobin A1c, Lipase, Magnesium, Phosphate, Protein- Total, Thyroid (TSH and Free thyroxine), B12 and Vitamin D, E5R and something in doctor writing that starts with tissue tromglutaSCRIBBLE.

I am guessing they are all something to do with nutrition. I really wish that doctor would have been easier to talk to and explain stuff to me.

That last item is tissue transglutaminase (antibodies) which is a test for intestinal inflammation from gluten reactions. The rest are various indices for malabsorption of fats, protein, blood sugar, calcium, B12, etc. which can all occur with celiac damage to the intestines. Yes, those all are related to nutritional deficiencies which can occur with undiagnosed celiac disease.

However, his comment about gluten and 'keep doing that (avoiding gluten)' makes me wonder whether he's looking for other problems to diagnose or he's really well informed about celiac disease and the nutritional deficiencies that can occur with undiagnosed celiac. You could 'google' any of those tests for more info, to understand how those might relate to nutritional deficiencies or even celiac disease. Then you could 'explain stuff' to that doctor when you return very well informed about everything he didn't bother to explain to you.

SUE

T.H. Community Regular

First - this is an awesome doctor, IMO. :) If you can get him again, I'd go for it. I know regular doctors who don't do these tests, and they SHOULD.

I don't recognize all of them, but the ones I do recognize are for vitamin deficiencies, and I believe a couple check certain levels of 'something' that checks how certain organs are functioning. I recognize the thyroid test, for example - many celiacs have hypothyroidism.

Adult discovered celiacs often have vitamin deficiencies and can have some of their organs malfunctioning as well, so this guy is awesome!

Also, re: the celiac test? Are you still gluten free? The numbers I hear most are that you need to be eating a good amount of gluten for 6 weeks prior to the test or it can test negative, so if you are still gluten free, or have been until recently, a knowledgeable doctor wouldn't do the test.

Also, some doctors recommend you go back on gluten so they can do the test. Many people here, and some doctors, question that, since it means you have to deliberately hurt yourself (eat gluten) to the point that it affects your body so badly that they can see it in a test.

Some of us think that's seems counterproductive to being healthy, ya know?

You CAN get a genetic test done to see if you have the Celiac Gene. Many doctors will give you a celiac diagnosis if you have the gluten challenge - which you have - and the gene.

Alright. I finally went to the walk-in clinic doctor about my gluten free discovery, hoping he'd do a test to formally diagnose Celiac. He just said, "so there are no more symptoms now that you don't eat gluten? Great, keep doing that." He gave me a sheet to go get tested at a lab for a whole list of things but never explained why he was testing for those things. I was hoping someone here could try and enlighten me on why these tests would be done:

CBC, routine urine analysis, electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, CO2), Albumin, alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Bilirubin- total only, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, ferritin, glucose-random, GGT, Hemoglobin A1c, Lipase, Magnesium, Phosphate, Protein- Total, Thyroid (TSH and Free thyroxine), B12 and Vitamin D, E5R and something in doctor writing that starts with tissue tromglutaSCRIBBLE.

I am guessing they are all something to do with nutrition. I really wish that doctor would have been easier to talk to and explain stuff to me.

Coinkey Apprentice

So if that last item, the tissue transglutaminase test is to do with gluten antibodies- shouldn't I be eating gluten before I do the test? It's only been 6 weeks and I've accidently glutened myself at least once a week since doing it (and once on purpose- food courts and dizzy hungry BAD combo). I get to make an appointment with the lab to get them done, so do you guys think it would be better to gluten myself for a week and then do the tests just to get a more accurate result? I don't really want to put myself through that but I don't want to get a false negative either.

burdee Enthusiast

So if that last item, the tissue transglutaminase test is to do with gluten antibodies- shouldn't I be eating gluten before I do the test? It's only been 6 weeks and I've accidently glutened myself at least once a week since doing it (and once on purpose- food courts and dizzy hungry BAD combo). I get to make an appointment with the lab to get them done, so do you guys think it would be better to gluten myself for a week and then do the tests just to get a more accurate result? I don't really want to put myself through that but I don't want to get a false negative either.

I don't know how long TtG (tissue transglutaminase) antibodies survive in the blood (assuming you get a blood test for Ttg. However I took an Enterolab stool test over 2 months after I mostly stopped eating gluten, though I still was taking a digestive supplement which I didn't realize contained barley. My Ttg test was still positive enough to diagnose gut inflammation consistent with celiac disease. If you have had some accidents, even though you're trying to follow a gluten free diet, you may still have enough gut inflammation to produce enough TtG antibodies, even though you won't produce enough gluten antibodies to leak from your gut into your blood.

Nevertheless, that's just my guess, because I got a stool test for TtG, not a blood test. Maybe someone who's had a TtG blood test could share their experience/expertise ...

SUE

summerteeth Enthusiast

You CAN get a genetic test done to see if you have the Celiac Gene. Many doctors will give you a celiac diagnosis if you have the gluten challenge - which you have - and the gene.

My doctor diagnosed me based on dietary response, medical history, and family history (history of bowel cancers). From what I gather, more and more doctors are doing this.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,816
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shamrock HVAC Services
    Newest Member
    Shamrock HVAC Services
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Kiwifruit, I agree further testing is needed.  Disaccharidase deficiency is a symptom of Celiac disease.   On your test results, this line  "IgA: 0.9 g/l (norm 0.8 - 4.0)" is referring to Total IgA and it's very low.  People with low or deficient Total IgA should also have DGP IgG test done.  Low Total IgA means you are making low levels of tTg  IgA as well, leading to false negatives or "weak positives".  Maybe a DNA test for known Celiac genes.   Anemia, diabetes, and thiamine deficiency can cause test results like these.  Get checked for B12 deficiency anemia and have your iron (ferritin) checked.  Vitamin D deficiency is common, too.   Might be time to find a gastrointestinal doctor who is more familiar with diagnosing Celiac Disease.   Best wishes on your journey!  Please keep us posted on your progress.  
    • trents
      Yes, there is a trend in the medical community to forego the endoscopy/biopsy and grant an official celiac diagnosis based on high tTG-IGA antibody scores alone. This trend started in the UK and is spreading to the USA medical community. And yes, 5-10x the normal level is what I have been seeing as the threshold as well. Here is the relevant section dealing from the article above dealing with the importance of the total IGA test being ordered. See the embedded attachment.
    • hmkr
      Ok, interesting. Not what I was thinking that meant. I'm reading the article and trying to understand. I see this “According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy” My IgG is 90, which is 6 times. So to me that means it's highly likely I do have it. 
    • trents
      It just means you aren't IGA deficient, i.e., that IGA deficiency cannot have given you artificially low scores in the individual IGA celiac antibody tests. This is explained in the article Scott linked above.
    • hmkr
      Normal range: 70 - 400 mg/dL, a little above middle of the range. So what does that mean? Thank you! I will check out that page you linked. Appreciate it! 
×
×
  • Create New...