Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dr Wants More Mammogram Films

Skylark

Recommended Posts

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I had my first screening mammogram a couple weeks ago. Didn't think anything of it. Yesterday I got a call out of the blue to schedule more films and an ultrasound. :unsure:

Dr's office didn't even call me to tell me there was an issue. I got on the phone and called them. A nurse called back, said there was no info in my chart, only the order for more films. She couldn't tell me anything else. I didn't get to talk to the Dr.

Now I'm scared half to death. Is it normal to go for more tests after a first mammogram so they know how things look? Has anyone else had this happen and it turned out to be nothing? I keep trying not to cry here at work from fear. The appointment is Monday and I don't know how I'm going to make it through the weekend.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

I had my first screening mammogram a couple weeks ago. Didn't think anything of it. Yesterday I got a call out of the blue to schedule more films and an ultrasound. :unsure:

Dr's office didn't even call me to tell me there was an issue. I got on the phone and called them. A nurse called back, said there was no info in my chart, only the order for more films. She couldn't tell me anything else. I didn't get to talk to the Dr.

Now I'm scared half to death. Is it normal to go for more tests after a first mammogram so they know how things look? Has anyone else had this happen and it turned out to be nothing? I keep trying not to cry here at work from fear. The appointment is Monday and I don't know how I'm going to make it through the weekend.

I'm so sorry you're scared half to death by this. They really don't know what dread these calls place in our hearts. It is not unusual to request follow-up fillms - I always used to expect them because I have very fibrocystic breasts and they could never visualize things properly or did not know what they were seeing. Most often it is nothing at all to worry about. I have had oodles of follow-up films, ultrasounds, biopsies, and still have both intact boobs :D. And I have a very strong family history of breast cancer to boot - grandmother, mother, two sisters. So while I know it is alarming, do try not to be too alarmed because it will most likely turn out to be nothing to worry about. But they do want to make sure, which is good :)

ksymonds84 Enthusiast
ksymonds84
Posted

This happened to me last year. For me it was that they needed to compress a little tighter on one side to see better. It was all good. It did scare me to death though. Like you they also waited a couple weeks to inform me that I needed to come back in for more images. The one thing they told me which may help you is that they don't wait two weeks if they see something suspicious, they haul you in that same day of your mammogram if they see something that could be serious. Will be thinking of you!

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

This happened to me too. I had to go back and have another film of the right side--they needed a clearer look because I had very dense breast tissue. Everything was fine, thank goodness, but I had the same sheer panic as you do now when I got the call. The nurse the day I went back told me that this happens sometimes.

(((hug))) take a deep breath :)

Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

It's hard not to think the worst. There are alot of reasons for follow up films. Women who have dense breast tissue are harder to see things on a mammogram. Tissue can be superimposed and can give the appearance of something abnormal. Other benign findings can be cysts, fibroadenomas and benign calcifications just to name a few. The ultrasound will help tell them if the area is fluid filled or solid and can help identify if the borders are irregular or smooth. Alot of the time they either need to do additional views to see if it is superimposed tissue or can do magnification views to see something better. In the breast center I worked at the radiologist would always come in and review the extra images with the patient and tell them what they saw before they left. I'm not sure that is how your center works or not.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted
  • Author

Thanks so much everyone. It helps a LOT to know that this is a normal process. Also helps to know that they would have hauled me right back if they saw something bad and not just a little unclear.

I'm new to the screening and I have a friend who had breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy last year so it's fresh in my mind. I'm er... well endowed... so I guess it's no surprise they couldn't visualize everything perfectly the first time round.

Darn210 Enthusiast
Darn210
Posted

I've had to do this too . . . sometimes immediately if the radiologist is there and sees them before I've left. Last year I got called back in the same week. I've had additional films and ultrasounds done.

I also have dense fibrocystic breasts. I tell the rad tech that I'm dense (*cough*)and to squeeze 'em good so I don't have to come back . . . that has actuall helped . . . :P I also asked the tech if women with fibrocystic breasts are at a higher risk for breast cancer. She said no, but they are MUCH more likely to be called back for second looks.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted
  • Author

Thanks, Janet

I got another call from the center confirming my appointment and they actually said something about dense tissue. I guess they just couldn't see everything.

You gals have been so helpful. I'm not worried any more, which is a great change from this morning. It's so nice to have a community of kind, supportive people to turn to! :wub:

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

I'm not worried any more, which is a great change from this morning.

The first thing I thought when I read your post yesterday was--jeesh, why do these things always seem to happen on a Friday! I'm glad you won't have to be anxious about it all weekend. :D

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

Thanks, Janet

I got another call from the center confirming my appointment and they actually said something about dense tissue. I guess they just couldn't see everything.

You gals have been so helpful. I'm not worried any more, which is a great change from this morning. It's so nice to have a community of kind, supportive people to turn to! :wub:

Many years ago, I used to read the mammogram reports to see if they found anything to put on the billing as a diagnosis for the people who needed repeat or extra x-rays & thus more charges. Most of them had dense tissue that required some extra angles and shots but nothing found. Since this was your first, they didn't have anything to compare it to. Next year should go smoother as they will know what is normal for you.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Yea I had this happen to me too and as you have seen from the other responses it is not unusual. I have had a couple times when they would send me straight in for an ultrasound after making me sit until the mammo was read. Try not to worry about it.

Juliebove Rising Star
Juliebove
Posted

I had the dense tissue too. Needed a 2nd one. But no problem in the end.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,210
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Sharon Camden
    Newest Member
    Sharon Camden
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      For people with celiac disease and corn intolerance from it: Is salt still okay for most people?

      By trents · Posted

      There is dextrose in table salt?
    • trents
      Gluten Free Beer - The Enzymatic Hydrolyzation Process Problem

      By trents · Posted

      Jason, I have a bone to pick with your terminology. There is "gluten intolerance" which I believe is synonymous with celiac disease and then there is "gluten sensitivity" which comes from Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or NCGS for short. It is true, however, that there is still a lot of inconsistency in the use of these terms.
    • Liquid lunch
      Medicinal mushrooms 🍄

      By Liquid lunch · Posted

      I can’t say this will work for everyone but for me the difference is incredible so might be worth trying. I’ve never been diagnosed celiac but via an elimination diet I realised I can’t eat any lectins, gluten soy and oats are particularly problematic. If I eat them I’m in bed for a week, then heavy bleeding and extreme pain for another, followed by a third week of bleeding on and off. My skin was a mess and it snowed when I brushed my hair. Since taking reishi and cordyceps mushroom tincture I can’t believe the difference, I’ve had a lot of help from this site so I want to return the favour. I took the tincture for my guts but the most apparent effect is that I feel like my brain works again, I can’t begin to describe how wonderful it is to be able to achieve basic things, I’ve barely been able to organise getting out of bed for so long, it feels like I haven’t been hit over the head with a mallet for the first time in years. Then I glutened myself, not necessarily gluten as so many things wipe me out but definitely ate something I shouldn’t have, I took a treble dose of the tincture and almost immediately felt much better so continued with the increased dose and three days (not weeks) later was back to feeling great, no bleeding involved. My skin is better than I can remember it ever being, I feel great 😊. I spend £1.50 a day on these but it’s worth every penny, I hope this helps someone else out there reading this. I wish I’d known about them 20 years ago. best wishes everyone 🍄 
    • Scott Adams
      Endoscopy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Given your history of a high TTG (167) that decreased to 16 on a gluten-free diet, along with genetic confirmation of celiac disease, it’s likely the negative biopsy is a false negative due to not eating gluten before the endoscopy. Gluten is necessary to trigger the intestinal damage seen in celiac disease, and avoiding it can lead to healing and a normal biopsy despite ongoing immune activity (reflected in your still-elevated TTG). The inflammation observed during the endoscopy (“diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa”) could be residual damage, mild ongoing inflammation, or another condition like peptic duodenitis, but it’s consistent with celiac disease in context. Continued positive blood markers suggest ongoing gluten exposure, possibly from cross-contamination or hidden sources. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet and follow-up testing are key to managing symptoms and reducing inflammation. Discuss these findings with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis and refine your dietary approach. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Biopsy results after 1,5 gfd

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Yes, it sounds like great progress, but what was the time frame between the two endoscopies? 
×
×
  • Create New...