Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Breastfeeding-- Does Gluten Travel Through Breastmilk?


BrooklynFamily

Recommended Posts

BrooklynFamily Apprentice

Hi,

I'm due with baby #2 in about 6 weeks. We recently found out that our son (28 months old) has Celiac Disease. He is doing amazingly on a gluten-free diet and we are thrilled beyond belief. At the same time, the Celiac diagnosis came out-of-the-blue for us since, as far as we know at this point, no one in either of our families has been diagnosed Celiac. In any case, I've been hearing conflicting things about whether or not gluten can travel through breastmilk or not. I do plan on breastfeeding the new baby, and I do still occasionally eat gluten. Will this travel to the new baby or not? Obviously, we don't know yet if the new baby will have Celiac Disease, but at the same time, if I can avoid seeing another one of my children go through the pain of undiagnosed Celiac Disease, I would love to. What have you heard?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

Though I haven't been looking for information on the subject, there have been many threads on this board about it. A search should turn them up.

However, seems to me the consensus is that the gluten you ingest will effect the baby, not just via the milk, but right now, before birth. Again, I've not been delving into the subject, but I'd say the antibodies will travel into the fetus. And, antibodies would also get into the milk. Not sure about gluten itself, but knowing how the developing baby will gain immunity from the mother, it makes sense that this would also be true for the intolerance to gluten. So I think the issue is more about the antibodies than the actual gluten, though I'm not ruling that out.

If any of the above isn't true, I'm sure others will quickly point it out.

HTH

mommida Enthusiast

If the mother ingests gluten, gluten is in the breastmilk.

my3monkees Rookie

I don't know about gluten. But I know alot can pass through. I could not have any dairy the entire 1 1/2 yrs. I nursed my daughter. If I had dairy she was gassy, cranky, mucous poop and broke out in eczema. HTH

tarnalberry Community Regular

RiceGuy: she's not gluten intolerant/celiac, her first kid is. So, no antibodies to pass to the fetus.

BrooklynFamily: yes, gluten is passed through breastmilk in such a way that a celiac baby would be adversely affected. celiac is not always "activated" at birth, so it's your choice whether or not to wait to see if the newborn has problems or not. it might be convenient, at this point, to take the whole family gluten-free (but I'm one who doesn't think it's too hard to do that ;) )

atouchofblue Newbie

my little boy was born 6 weeks early and was a healthy premmie. six weeks later at his due date he became very sick, constant vomiting, watery stools, trouble breathing, not sleeping, screaming for hours on end and producing a large quantity of mucus. by eight weeks he had had skin prick tests and blood tests, in which it was found he was allergic to wheat, soy and dairy. and diagnosed celiac. and since he was not even on solids it meant all his triggers where comimg through my breastmilk. after radically altering my diet, within two weeks he was gaining weight again, sleeping more, and even managed to stop screaming! It all came through my breastmilk but i managed and continued to breatfeed to 15months. If i made the slightest mistake we would know within 10 hours as he would be sick again, and then take a couple of days to clear. Fortunately we had a family history of it so we could push for testing sooner. we would have had to weight until he was one otherwise.

good luck and i hope your bubs is not going to be the same!

BrooklynFamily Apprentice

Thank you very much for the replies. Sounds like, yes, the gluten will travel through my breastmilk to the new baby. It's funny because I breastfed my son until he was 15 months old-- eating gluten all the time-- and he didn't start exhibiting celiac symptoms until we stopped breastfeeding and he was only eating solids. At 15 months, he just stopped/slowed growing. At 26 months, he became sick-- lethargic, extreme weight loss, etc.-- and that was when he was diagnosed. I'll talk to our pediatric GI doc about it, too. Thanks again for the replies.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



StephanieL Enthusiast

The benefits of breastfeeding far outweigh that of formula ESP. with food allergies! It may not be easy restricting your diet *if* your new baby has an issue but it is totally doable because of the positives! I had a long list oh no-no's while nursing my son but only dairy and egg for my second. Good luck to you!

RiceGuy Collaborator

RiceGuy: she's not gluten intolerant/celiac, her first kid is. So, no antibodies to pass to the fetus.

Yeah, I know she isn't intolerant/Celiac (as far as she knows). However, seems to me many get a negative on tests, even though some antibodies are detected. So I wouldn't feel comfortable thinking that there are absolutely zero antibodies present. Plus I never say never, when gluten intolerance is concerned. I mean, if it's in the family...

Not suggesting she is though, and hoping not of course!

scarlett77 Apprentice

Thank you very much for the replies. Sounds like, yes, the gluten will travel through my breastmilk to the new baby. It's funny because I breastfed my son until he was 15 months old-- eating gluten all the time-- and he didn't start exhibiting celiac symptoms until we stopped breastfeeding and he was only eating solids. At 15 months, he just stopped/slowed growing. At 26 months, he became sick-- lethargic, extreme weight loss, etc.-- and that was when he was diagnosed. I'll talk to our pediatric GI doc about it, too. Thanks again for the replies.

A couple of things I want to point out here...#1 as Raven said even if child #2 is predisposed it may not be ACTIVATED. As you said your first son was fine up until certain point. Mine was the same way. Activation could be triggered by just about anything at anytime from what I understand. #2 It was recommended to me by my GI that we introduce wheat and gluten to our youngest between 7-10 months. That apparently is the "window of opportunity" to be least likely to trigger. Be sure to check with your GI doc and see what s/he says.

My Celiac son was breastfed but started sliding down the charts after 9 months when his diet turned primarily solids (he was uninterested in BF). I never questioned breastfeeding his younger brother. But I was very watchful. So far so good. My household is gluten free though and the only time I have gluten is when I eat out at work for lunch.

  • 7 years later...
ch88 Collaborator

Here is some more information on the topic from my research and things I  have found online.

Anything under 20 ppm gluten is generally considered safe for someone with celiac disease. I have never heard of any milk containing gluten contamination above 20 ppm.

I don't know what the limit is for a wheat allergy but it may be much lower. Wheat is a common food allergy. 

Unless there is cross contamination that happens diary farm, there isn't any risk. Meat and blood is always gluten free even if the animal has been fed wheat.

Very very very trace amounts of gluten can get into milk but they are below the threshold for celiac disease. 

Open Original Shared Link

Also if someone has the genes for for celiac disease they may or may not develop celiac disease at some point in their life. Screening for celiac disease is a good idea. 

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.