Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Son Going For Follow Up- Test Question


Sharon C.

Recommended Posts

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son is going back for a follow up after being diagnosed last October with Celiac. They are testing him with this same test. They are not doing a Gliadin/IgG-IgA. Just a tTG, and also thyroid function and also CBC/platlet. Is this a normal way to check to see if levels have gone down?

Also, when my son was diagnosed, I asked my doctor to screen me. He had NEVER screened anyone for gluten intolerance before. He sent me for the Gliadin IgG-IgA test but NOT the tTG. He said it "seemed" like I was negative. Is this the proper way to screen someone?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikki-uk Enthusiast

Hi Sharon,

In answer to your question about your son-doing just a tTg test is normal to see if his level of antibodies have gone down since going gluten-free.

To gain the full facts your doctor would have done better to include a tTg test in your coeliac screen.The tTg test is only for coeliac disease(meaning it is only gluten intolerance that can give you a positive).Whereas a high IgA or IgG could point towards coeliac,but other conditions also cause raised levels

  • 2 weeks later...
Lesliean Apprentice

tTga misses up to 70% of celiacs so the anti-gliadin tests are very important. I am a lot less concerned about the relatively low sensitivity (being positive when you don't have it) than I am with a low sensitivity (being told you don't have it when you do) of the individual tests. The problem, as I see it, is that untill you have an advanced case with moderate to severe intestinal damage you may not show up positive on any one test. By that time you will no doubt have all sorts of medical problems and some of them are likely to not be reversable.

Autoantibodies and histogenesis of celiac disease.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies are used as markers for celiac disease (celiac disease) identifying patients with mucosal lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and role of the autoantibodies such as IgA antiendomysium (EMA), IgA antigliadin (AGA) and the IgA antitissue transglutaminase (tTGA) in histogenesis of celiac disease. METHODS: Seventy-nine cases including 30 untreated celiacs, 5 celiacs on gluten-free diet (GFD), 41 first degree relatives and 3 non-relatives suspected for celiac disease were investigated. Three untreated celiacs with IgA deficiency were excluded from this study group. IgA antibodies to tTGA were determined by ELISA, as described before. Twelve of 41 relatives and 2 cases of non relatives suspected with positive serology underwent a small intestinal biopsy. Results were correlated with the degrees of abnormality of the intestinal mucosa in patients with celiac disease. Intestinal biopsies obtained from study population were evaluated for histological quantification. RESULTS: Celiacs and suspected cases with positive EMA/AGA and or tTGA showed shorter villi (p < 0.007) and/or a higher number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) (p < 0.035). The sensitivity of serology (EMA, AGA, tTGA) in patients with Marsh IIIc was 100%. However, in patients with Marsh IIIa the sensitivity for EMA, AGA, and tTGA was 40%, 50% and 20% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of antibodies is related to the degree of mucosal infiltration by IELs. Although tTGA, like EMA provide a highly sensitive parameter for the detection of celiacs with severe mucosal damage, it appears to be less sensitive (even less than AGA) in celiac patients with milder histopathological abnormalities. However, it should be recognized that the substantial part of the celiac population present with these milder forms of mucosal abnormalities. Using tTGA as a single test in screening may result in missing up to 60-70% of celiacs with mild mucosal abnormalities. Combination with other screening tests (at least with AGA) is essential and strongly recommended.

Open Original Shared Link

nikki-uk Enthusiast

Interesting article,I didn't realise the tTg missed so many people.

I think my husband is a medical mystery!All his bloods were negative except for the tTg which was borderline.

When he had biopsy it showed extensive villous atrophy-so it doesn't necessarily correlate that high levels of antibodies means more intestinal damage.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
tTga misses up to 70% of celiacs so the anti-gliadin tests are very important. I am a lot less concerned about the relatively low sensitivity (being positive when you don't have it) than I am with a low sensitivity (being told you don't have it when you do) of the individual tests. The problem, as I see it, is that untill you have an advanced case with moderate to severe intestinal damage you may not show up positive on any one test. By that time you will no doubt have all sorts of medical problems and some of them are likely to not be reversable.

   

   

tTG is the most specific test for celiac. The tTG and EMA are the most important, along with the total serum IgA.

The other 2 tests(IgA and IgG) are not really relied on because they can be so inaccurate

The tTG test may take the place of a biopsy in diagnosis in children in the near future. It is a very sensitive test and the probability of it being false is slim to none.

I wouldn't trust all articles that you find on the Internet. Some are accurate but I have heard up to 50% of the info on the Internet is incorrect in some way.

celiac3270 Collaborator
tTG is the most specific test for celiac. The tTG and EMA are the most important, along with the total serum IgA.

The other 2 tests(IgA and IgG) are not really relied on because they can be so inaccurate

The tTG test may take the place of a biopsy in diagnosis in children in the near future. It is a very sensitive test and the probability of it being false is slim to none.

Yes...that's what I had heard from multiple knowledgeable doctors.

The biopsy is still the gold standard, but the tTG is the best serologic test we have right now--much, much better than the Anti-Gliadin IgA and IgG, and even better and less expensive than the EMA.

Lesliean Apprentice

I hear what you are saying. But these aren't articles on the web. They are abstracts from medical peer reviewed studies. My vote is for several tests to be done at one time and to not rely on one or two tests.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

which medical studies? some medical people dont exactly know what they are talking about..and obviously the research has been going well with the tTG testing that they are getting ready to use it to replace biopsy for diagnosis. I mean the research all points to that test being the best blood test and highly accurate. The rate of it being false is really low...but I guess possible. I think a full panel is beneficial but I think that the tTG is really the best test of the bunch

I would like to know who wrote that abstract you are referring to:)

key Contributor

Not all research articles are accurate, but I disagree with one blood test being 100% accurate for diagnoses. Especially in children under 2 years old. My son has it and his ttg was normal. He only had one blood level elevated and it was least sensitive for celiac. I think there is alot they don't know yet, so I thought the article was interesting.

Monica

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

In kids under the age of 2 all of the celiac tests can be inaccurate. In other cases, I think a full panel is beneficial to get done..I never recommend just one test be done...but from info I have gathered from many knowlegable doctors and many reliable articles it shows that the tTG is the best test for detecting the disease...

Lesliean Apprentice

Kaiti,

When people ask for what tests to be done I always wait for your answer. You put a great panel of tests up with clear guidance. The study link for my first post was on the post and here is the header to it that I did leave off: Rom J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;12(2):101-6. I brought this abstract in to show my specialist and he was very impressed by it.

Autoantibodies and histogenesis of celiac disease.

Rostami K, Mulder CJ, Stapel S, von Blomberg BM, Kerckhaert J, Meijer JW, Pena SA, Heymans HS.

Department of Gastroenterology Withybush General Hospital, Pembrokeshire, Haverfordwest, UK. krostami@hotmail.com. (see weblink in above posting)

In America we miss diagnosing most celiacs (studies show 1/133). I agree that the tTga is the best test currently to specifically diagnose celiac disease, but this study (as well as a few more recent ones I have read recently) are finding a coorelation between tTga's being positive and the amount of villi damage. They conclude the moderate and mild early cases will be missed (till later) and they recommend keeping AGA and AGG to help pick up those cases.

I like to see blood work used without biopsy. I just recommend a complete panel including tTga and AGA and AGG. This seems in line with your recommendations to people who write in.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Leslie-yep,I agree the full panel is definitely the way to go. I never recommend one test..its just to risky that way in my opinion

Thanks for posting the source of that info as well...I like to learn all views :D

anniej55 Apprentice

Kaiti,

I am so confused ... and if you don't me asking, how old are you? I can't figure it from the picture. You are so knowledgeable!

I never had the ttg test, but was diagnosed with the Iga and IGg. So now I'm wondering if I do have celiacs .... and to make it even tougher, I'm having a very difficult time staying away from the forbidden foods. Up until this week my life was wrapped up with school (I'm a middle school librarian) and medical tests (biopsy, colonoscopy, etc). Now that I have "down" time I find myself VERY angry that I cannot eat what I want to eat and very sad. Even though all the tests came back great ....

It's all I can do to stop myself from going to the local sub shop and getting a tuna sub on their great bread ... or spaghetti and meatballs ... or fried scallops. Yep, got it bad. And I do have the gluten-free food in the house - it is NOT what I want. :angry:

Thanks for listening

ann

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I'm 17 at the moment...I will be 18 in about 2 weeks!!!

If the doctor gave you a diagnosis with high IgA I would say you have it. IgA can be wrong when low due to IgA deficiency. Most of the time when it's high it will be accurate. You have antibodies so therefore there is a gluten problem

However, now a full panel which includes the tTG is recommended because that will be very thorough then.

You really need to make sure you are gluten free though...if not it can cause alot more problems.

Good luck with everything and feel free to email me if you need any more help with foods, etc.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,120
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ronald Y
    Newest Member
    Ronald Y
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Hello there! @Jordan Carlson , you said "Now the last 3 ish years I have been sick more than I ever have been in my life. Could it be my immune system was so tired/fatigued prior to diagnosis that it just wouldnt turn on anymore? And now that my stress and inflammation is down its functioning stronger?" I think you may have that backwards.  Your immune system was running in high gear with undiagnosed Celiac Disease, and therefore fighting infections like colds and viruses before you had any symptoms.  Now that you've gone gluten free, your immune system may be depressed and not able to mount a strong immune response to colds and viruses because it is running low in essential vitamins and minerals needed for that immune response.  Hence you have more infections and worse symptoms now.   For strong immune responses, our bodies need vitamins and minerals that may be lacking on the gluten free diet.  Supplementing with essential nutrients boosts our ability to absorb the vitamins and minerals while our intestinal villi are healing in the first few years of recovery.   Many are low in vitamins and minerals that help our immune system, like Vitamin D, Vitamin C, zinc, iron, the eight B vitamins, especially Thiamine, selenium, and magnesium.   Have you talked to your doctor and nutritionist about supplementing with vitamins and minerals?   Correcting nutritional deficiencies is frequently overlooked after diagnosis.  
    • Jordan Carlson
      @trents I do take all the recommended vitamins and excersize regularly. Basically do all things labeled as a healthy lifestyle haha. Thats why I was thinking more this is my immune system now having the energy to fight viruses rather than being too stressed out as I have heard that it is a common thing when your body is over stressed due to underlying autoimmune diseases
    • trents
      Jordan Carlson, Wheat flour is fortified with vitamins ("enriched") where as gluten free facsimile flours are not. So when you eliminate wheat flour from your diet you may lose a significant source of nutrition. At the same time, gluten-free prepackaged foods are practically devoid of vitamins and minerals, consisting mostly of highly processed high carbohydrate grain substitutes. Lots of rice flour and tapioca. Have you compensated by adding in some high quality gluten free vitamin and mineral supplements? We typically recommend this for new celiacs, especially at the front end of recovery before there has been very much healing of the small bowel villous lining and nutritional absorption is still poor. Edit: I edited my other post to direct it to Sanna King's post.
    • Jordan Carlson
      Hey there @trents. I wish I could edit my original post. I am talking about getting a cold way more often, not gluten poisoning.
    • trents
      Reply to Sanna King: As you have withdrawn gluten from your diet you have lost all tolerance to it that you had when consuming it on a regular basis. This is normal. Not everyone experiences it but it is common. It has been my experience as well. When I was consuming gluten every meal every day for years after the onset of celiac disease but before diagnosis I would experience mild GI symptoms like a little occasional diarrhea. After being gluten free for a significant time, any major exposure to gluten would make me violently ill. Hours of severe cramps and vomiting followed by hours of diarrhea. Like when my wife made me gluten-free biscuits and made herself wheat flour biscuits and I got them mixed up and ate a couple. I am not a super sensitive celiac in the sense of being made ill by small amounts of cross contamination but if I get a significant exposure like I just described it is awful. 
×
×
  • Create New...