Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Intestinal Recovery Rate

bincongo

By bincongo
in Related Issues & Disorders

Recommended Posts

bincongo Contributor
bincongo
Posted

I read an article on Celiac.com, sorry I can't remember the name, it said that the intestinal recovery rate was only 34% at 2 years and 66% at 5 years. Three factors influence this rate, those who did not follow the gluten free diet well, those with diarrhea and weight loss and those who showed total villous atrophy on biopsy. I had total villous atrophy on my biopsy so where does that leave me? Some have said it depends on where they took the biopsy. I guess my question is if they did this study did they look at the entire intestine for damage and has anyone done a study on damage done based on where they took the biopsy? If you can point me to studies I would like more information. I know Celiac's feel better on the diet but if only 66% have intestional improvement doesn't that mean more cancer risk for those who don't improve?

I found the article - Mucosal Recovery and Mortality in Adults With Celiac Disease After Treatment With a Gluten-Free Diet

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Emilushka Contributor
Emilushka
Posted

Remember: one article isn't enough to create clinical guidelines. I found the article you were talking about. They only looked at 300 patients. Celiac is so different between people that I would wait until you see more studies before jumping to conclusions about yourself.

The key finding from this article is that there may be some usefulness to getting further biopsies to track recovery in adults with Celiac Disease.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The answer is that although Celiac predisposes to small bowel cancer and lymphoma, it does NOT predispose to colorectal cancer! YAY! (Didn't want to scare you by leaving the punchline until later.)

Open Original Shared Link

This one best addressed the lymphoma link. Basically what it says is that some people with refractory Celiac have such messed-up T-cells that they develop into a T-cell lymphoma. So this article basically linked the majority of the lymphoma risk to the refractory Celiac population.

Open Original Shared Link

The study of biopsy location seems to be stuck in the "Where should we biopsy?" stage. So I don't think anybody has done anything to figure out what damage where causes what outcomes. This research is all still very much in the baby stages, from what I can tell. However, interestingly enough, making sure there are duodenal bulb biopsies seems to be helpful for getting accurate diagnoses, so hopefully there will be an easier time getting answers for Celiac patients in the future.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

Well, keep in mind that studies also find that fewer than half of all diagnosed celiacs actually stay strictly gluten free.

sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

Well, keep in mind that studies also find that fewer than half of all diagnosed celiacs actually stay strictly gluten free.

You mean "try as we may" with unintentional CC from time to time...or do they intentionally eat foods that are a no-no?

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

You mean "try as we may" with unintentional CC from time to time...or do they intentionally eat foods that are a no-no?

Some in the studies admit to intentionally eating gluten. They tend to be the ones with the poorest and slowest healing, which is not a surprise.

sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

Some in the studies admit to intentionally eating gluten. They tend to be the ones with the poorest and slowest healing, which is not a surprise.

Well that's not at all a surprise then.

bincongo Contributor
bincongo
Posted
  • Author

Remember: one article isn't enough to create clinical guidelines. I found the article you were talking about. They only looked at 300 patients. Celiac is so different between people that I would wait until you see more studies before jumping to conclusions about yourself.

The key finding from this article is that there may be some usefulness to getting further biopsies to track recovery in adults with Celiac Disease.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The answer is that although Celiac predisposes to small bowel cancer and lymphoma, it does NOT predispose to colorectal cancer! YAY! (Didn't want to scare you by leaving the punchline until later.)

Open Original Shared Link

This one best addressed the lymphoma link. Basically what it says is that some people with refractory Celiac have such messed-up T-cells that they develop into a T-cell lymphoma. So this article basically linked the majority of the lymphoma risk to the refractory Celiac population.

Open Original Shared Link

The study of biopsy location seems to be stuck in the "Where should we biopsy?" stage. So I don't think anybody has done anything to figure out what damage where causes what outcomes. This research is all still very much in the baby stages, from what I can tell. However, interestingly enough, making sure there are duodenal bulb biopsies seems to be helpful for getting accurate diagnoses, so hopefully there will be an easier time getting answers for Celiac patients in the future.

Thanks for the information. I read somewhere that only 5% of Celiac's develop the more serious things like cancer. I figure it must be in the group of 34% whose intestines don't improve. So if I am unlucky enough to be in that group then I did the math and that gives me a 20% chance of not recovering and/or getting cancer. I would guess that 5% is the refractory Celiac population. I am starting out on the wrong foot by having a bad biopsy but what are my choices. I have to be gluten free and 80% odds are better than nothing. I have learned that I will ask for a repeat biopsy. I am not sure how often I should have it done. My Gasto doctor gave me the impression I didn't ever need to come back unless some new problem developed.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Emilushka Contributor
Emilushka
Posted

Thanks for the information. I read somewhere that only 5% of Celiac's develop the more serious things like cancer. I figure it must be in the group of 34% whose intestines don't improve. So if I am unlucky enough to be in that group then I did the math and that gives me a 20% chance of not recovering and/or getting cancer. I would guess that 5% is the refractory Celiac population. I am starting out on the wrong foot by having a bad biopsy but what are my choices. I have to be gluten free and 80% odds are better than nothing. I have learned that I will ask for a repeat biopsy. I am not sure how often I should have it done. My Gasto doctor gave me the impression I didn't ever need to come back unless some new problem developed.

Just keep doing what you're doing. Stay gluten-free, be as healthy as possible, see your doc for routine check-ups. Make sure you don't ignore problems. That's honestly the best any of us can do, since we can all get hit by a bus tomorrow and negate all those pesky lymphoma risks completely.

Don't try to take your odds from this research. There's just not enough there for you to know really what it means for you, and saying you have "80% chance" is too scary and potentially totally unrealistic. You may have 99% or 50% or be in a car crash.

All any of us can do is our best. Enjoy what you've got, and don't ignore any symptom that seems WRONG to you. Get your regular health screenings.

At least we have Celiac and not Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis! Those guys have it worse.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to mamaof7's topic in Parents, Friends and Loved Ones of Celiacs
      6

      Help understand results

      That test is saying that your daughter is not making normal amounts of any IGA antibodies. She's not making normal amounts of antibodies against gliadin, not against bacteria, not against viruses. She is deficient in total IGA, so the test for antigliadin antibodies is not valid. The test was a failure. The test only works if all different kinds of antibodies...
    2. knitty kitty
      0

      Vitamins I Take

    3. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to hjayne19's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      10

      Insomnia help

      @hjayne19, So glad you found the information helpful. I know how difficult my struggle with anxiety has been. I've been finding things that helped me and sharing that with others makes my journey worthwhile. I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex. It contains the easily activated forms of B vitamins needed by people with the MTHFR...
    4. trents
      - trents replied to pothosqueen's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Positive biopsy

      Welcome to the celiac.com community @pothosqueen! Can you be more specific about which IGA test was run that resulted in 114 score and said to be "normal" and could you please include the reference range for what would be normal? By the size of that number it looks like it may have been what we call "total IGA" but that test is not usually run...
    5. pothosqueen
      - pothosqueen posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Positive biopsy

      Upper endoscopy last week resulted in positive biopsy for celiac disease. The IgA they ran was normal (114). Does positive biopsy automatically mean definitive diagnosis?
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,992
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Elizabeth xxx
    Newest Member
    Elizabeth xxx
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Help understand results

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      That test is saying that your daughter is not making normal amounts of any IGA antibodies.  She's not making normal amounts of antibodies against gliadin, not against bacteria, not against viruses.  She is deficient in total IGA, so the test for antigliadin antibodies is not valid.  The test was a failure.  The test only works if all different kinds of antibodies were being made.  Your daughter is not making all different kinds of antibodies, so the test results are moot.  Your daughter should have the DGP IgG and TTG IgG tests done.   The tests should be performed while she is still consuming gluten.  Stopping and restarting a gluten containing diet can make her more sick, just like you refuse to eat gluten for testing.  Call the doctor's office, request both the IGG tests. Request to be put on the cancellation list for an appointment sooner.  Ask for genetic testing.   Celiac disease is passed on from parents to children.  You and all seven children should be tested for genes for Celiac disease.  Your parents, your siblings and their children should be tested as well.  Eating gluten is not required for genetic testing because your genes don't change.  Genetic testing is not a diagnosis of Celiac disease.  Just having the genes means there is the potential of developing Celiac disease if the Celiac genes are activated.  Genetic testing helps us decide if the Celiac genes are activated when coupled with physical symptoms, antibody testing, and biopsy examination. It's frustrating when doctors get it wrong and we suffer for it.  Hang in there.  You're a good mom for pursuing this!  
    • knitty kitty
      Insomnia help

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @hjayne19, So glad you found the information helpful.  I know how difficult my struggle with anxiety has been.  I've been finding things that helped me and sharing that with others makes my journey worthwhile. I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  It contains the easily activated forms of B vitamins needed by people with the MTHFR genetic variation often found with Celiac disease.   Avoid B Complex vitamins if they contain Thiamine Mononitrate if possible.  (Read the ingredients listing.)  Thiamine Mononitrate is the "shelf-stable" form of B 1 that the body can't utilize.  B vitamins breakdown when exposed to heat and light, and over time.  So "shelf-stable" forms won't breakdown sitting on a shelf in a bright store waiting to be bought.  (It's also very cheap.)  Thiamine Mononitrate is so shelf-stable that the body only absorbs about thirty percent of it, and less than that is utilized.  It takes thiamine already in the body to turn Thiamine Mononitrate into an active form.   I take MegaBenfotiamine by Life Extension.  Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing, neuropathy, brain function, glycemic control, and athletic performance.   I take TTFD-B1 Max by Maxlife Naturals, Ecological Formulas Allthiamine (TTFD), or Thiamax by EO Nutrition.  Thiamine Tetrahydrofurfuryl Disulfide (TTFD for short) gets into the brain and makes a huge difference with the anxiety and getting the brain off the hamster wheel.  Especially when taken with Magnesium Threonate.   Any form of Thiamine needs Magnesium to make life sustaining enzymes and energy.  I like NeuroMag by Life Extension.  It contains Magnesium Threonate, a form of magnesium that easily crosses the blood brain barrier.  My brain felt like it gave a huge sigh of relief and relaxed when I started taking this and still makes a difference daily.   Other brands of supplements i like are Now Foods, Amazing Formulas, Doctor's Best, Nature's Way, Best Naturals, Thorne, EO Nutrition. Naturewise.  But I do read the ingredients labels all the time just to be sure they are gluten and dairy free. Glad to help with further questions.  
    • trents
      Positive biopsy

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the celiac.com community @pothosqueen!   Can you be more specific about which IGA test was run that resulted in 114 score and said to be "normal" and could you please include the reference range for what would be normal? By the size of that number it looks like it may have been what we call "total IGA" but that test is not usually run without also running a TTG-IGA. Total IGA tests for IGA deficiency. If someone is IGA deficient, then the celiac-specific IGA tests like the TTG-IGA will be inaccurate. Was this the only IGA test that was run? To answer, your question, yes, a positive biopsy is normally definitive for celiac disease but there are some other medical conditions, some medications and even some food proteins in rare cases that can cause positive biopsies. But it is pretty unlikely that it is due to anything other than celiac disease.
    • pothosqueen
      Positive biopsy

      By pothosqueen · Posted

      Upper endoscopy last week resulted in positive biopsy for celiac disease. The IgA they ran was normal (114). Does positive biopsy automatically mean definitive diagnosis?
    • hjayne19
      Mallorca Guide

      By hjayne19 · Posted

      This is great thank you very much @Scott Adams
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.