Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Was Glutened...

mytummyhurts

Recommended Posts

mytummyhurts Contributor
mytummyhurts
Posted

I have been gluten free for a couple months now and on Weds I ate something that I thought was gluten free, but I looked at the box after I started to eat it and it said right on it "contains wheat." I know that was a huge mistake, lesson learned. But, nothing bad happened. And I ate a good amount of it. At least a few bites. What does this mean?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

Some people just don't get reactions. You could just get reactions some times and not other times which doesn't mean anything except that. It will still do the damage even if it doesn't cause the symptoms. Some people do get more sensitive to gluten the longer they are gluten free but others do not. I'm glad you didn't feel bad after eating it though :D

mytummyhurts Contributor
mytummyhurts
Posted
  • Author

I was glad too that I didn't get sick. But now I'm worried that if I am one of those people who doesn't have reactions when they get gluten that I may involuntarily eat it and not know that something has it in it and then eat it again. At least if you get sick you can sometimes trace it back to what you ate. I may be damaging my intestines and not even know it. That's what I'm worried about. :unsure:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,113
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jayme2037
    Newest Member
    Jayme2037
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      Endoscopy

      By Soleihey · Posted

      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Status Update...

      By TerryinCO · Posted

      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      Celiac or not?

      By trents · Posted

      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Celiac or not?

      By cristiana · Posted

      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      Vaccines

      By trents · Posted

      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...