Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Biopsy Necessary?


countrylinda

Recommended Posts

countrylinda Newbie

Hi,

I recently had the Celiac Panel done. The doctor says it was positive and has referred me to a GI doctor. The GI doctor wants to do the endoscope and biopsy. I am on a very high deductible insurance plan, and have suffered from many financial emergencies this year and my budget is currently negative a gazillion dollars. I do not want to pay for this procedure. Is it really necessary? According to my first doctor, I should avoid gluten based on my Celiac Panel results, whether or not the biopsy confirms celiac disease. I have been gluten free for over 2 weeks now and I really dont want to eat gluten again, just for this biopsy.

I dont have the results of my Celiac Panel yet, they are mailing them to me, but I will post them when they arrive. I have Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and some of the other celiac disease symptoms (pretty mild, usually). My mother has Graves/Diverticulitis/joint pain/difficulty swallowing, her sister has Graves and Diabetes, her other sister has MS, and their mother said that she was allergic to flour/oats. I've read that all of these things could be related to celiac disease and that it tends to run in families. I already am noticing great improvement in the general way I feel just from being gluten free for a couple weeks. I am having less anxiety and depression and am sleeping better. Plus I lost 7 lbs.

Anyway, I just dont see the point in having the biopsy done. Will it effect my treatment in any way? From what I've read so far the only treatment for celiac disease is a gluten free diet which I plan on doing anyway. Please tell me if I'm missing something here.

Thanks!

Linda


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

It is up to you whether you want to have the biopsy done or not. You may even want to talk to the doctor that did the blood test and explain the insurance situation and tell him you are going to get on the diet. Some doctors will diagnose based on the combo of positive blood work and resolution of symptoms gluten free. The biopsy also has a chance of a false negative which is something else to consider.

Dixiebell Contributor

Welcome!

I would say the procedure is not necessary at this time since you have a positive celiac panel and you can't afford it. If you were to have some problems later, being gluten free will not interfere with other testing you might need done.

tarnalberry Community Regular

If you've been gluten free for a few weeks, you'd have to go back on gluten for a while.

There isn't any sort of prescription or the like that you need in order to be gluten free, so a biopsy-proven diagnosis is not really that important. (Unless you want to take part in studies on celiacs. They tend to require biopsy proof.)

Skylark Collaborator

You are not missing anything by skipping the biopsy. If you have other GI problems, they can be found later while you are gluten-free. Bloodwork and response to the diet is plenty of evidence that you're celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,294
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    TanyaW
    Newest Member
    TanyaW
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Since nearly 40% of the population have the genes for celiac disease, but only ~1% end up getting it, a genetic test will only tell you that it is possible that you could one day get celiac disease, it would not be able to tell whether you currently have it or not.
    • KDeL
      so much to it.  the genetic testing will help if i don’t have it right? If theres no gene found then I definitely don’t have celiac?  I guess genetic testing, plus ruling out h.pylori, plus gluten challenge will be a good way to confirm yes or no for celiac. 
    • Scott Adams
      With NCGS there isn't villi damage, so it would not be detected via an endoscopy/biopsy. There also may not be high levels of tTG-IgA or tTG-IgG (sometimes they can be elevated, but in the normal range), but these blood tests may be slightly elevated or even high in people with NCGS: DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG (Deamidated Gliadin Peptide), but, you can still have it even if all of these tests are normal.
    • KDeL
      That all makes sense thank you.    I was within normal ranges - a little on the lower end.  So, the NCGS would still show positive biopsy? 
    • Scott Adams
      Do you happen to have the reference ranges for those blood tests, as they vary from lab to lab? Just the results don't mean much without those ranges. A gluten challenge would be the only way to get a formal diagnosis of celiac disease, and if the idea of eating lots of gluten for weeks sounds horrible to you, then you likely have either celiac disease and/or non-celiac gluten sensitivity, so you will need to decide how badly you want a formal diagnosis. Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:        
×
×
  • Create New...