Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Nuvaring


jenvan

Recommended Posts

jenvan Collaborator

I was wondering if anyone has tried the Nuvaring birth control? I worry about my birth control being absorbed fully, and would just love to not have so many hormones too. The Nuvaring is like a 1/3 of the hormones of the pill b/c it goes directly into your blood stream. Anyone used it ?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

I used it for about a month, but my body *really* doesn't like the hormones in there - I think, in particular, the synthetic progestins. I didn't have a problem with it other than that.

jenvan Collaborator

do you mean it was comfortable or irritating ?

  • 1 month later...
zakismom Newbie

Ihave used the nuvaring for over a year and it is the easiest method for me. I have had no irritation and it's been perfectly unnoticeable. I had previously used bcp's and suffered with mood swings and pms. I have virtually no side effects to the nuvaring. I plan on keeping it for as long as necessary!

  • 4 weeks later...
CaliGirl Newbie

I recommend the patch, personally. I tried the pill before I knew about celiac disease, and the hormones completely whacked me out. The patch didn't do that to me. Also, I like how the chemicals are absorbed through my bloodstream instead of going through my GI tract--much more reliable delivery!

Rachel

ruddabega Apprentice

I used the Nuvaring for six or so months, and loved it. It's the most safe form of birthcontrol because the levels of hormones are constant, and thus can be very low levels. I am fairly small, so I was worried about comfort. It was great though! I deffinetly reccommend it. (No one sees it, unlike the patch during swim season) Also, you change it once a month, not once a week, which you do with the patch.

Talk to your doctor about this, but I just kept it in for a full four weeks and had no period. I took it out every 3 months. It was soooo nice!

ruddabega Apprentice
I recommend the patch, personally. I tried the pill before I knew about celiac disease, and the hormones completely whacked me out. The patch didn't do that to me. Also, I like how the chemicals are absorbed through my bloodstream instead of going through my GI tract--much more reliable delivery!

Rachel

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The NuvaRing is similar because it also absorbs through to the blood stream.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ruddabega Apprentice

I realized that I look like I'm sexually active (at 17, YIKES!) I'm not, I just thought I'd clarify that. Heehee. I have a messed up endocrine system, so I do birth control for the hormone replacement.

jenvan Collaborator

thanks for the info ladies!

  • 3 weeks later...
PreOptMegs Explorer

Is there any internet source where I could get a listing of gluten-free birth control pills. I haven't had a period for about 1.5 years and I have been checked out by my doctor and she wants to start me on SEASONALE at Halloween if I haven't started yet. Does anyone know about SEASONALE, or have they used it? I like the fact that it only allows 4 periods per year!

  • 3 months later...
CaliGirl Newbie

I can't use my patch anymore!!!

I guess my pharmacy, CVS, got scared from the health risks on the news and they cancelled all prescriptions for the patch. No letter, no warning, nothing. It completely messed up my cycle, which of course, destroys the effectiveness of birth control. A week passed before I figured out why their computerized system had no record of my prescription for the patch.

So, then I switched to Nuva ring and I don't like it. I've had it for a week now, and I feel like I'm constantly cramping. It keeps on moving. I'm so aggrivated! I just want my patch back!

Here's my question: does it get better after a while? Are they all "one size fits all"? I really don't want to take the pill, but this isn't working for me.

Thanks for your help, ladies!

jenvan Collaborator

Glad this thread came back up--I wanted to post on nuvaring... I started it about 3 weeks ago and so far its great! I don't notice it at all--(its also not a prob. during sex : ) for those who are curious, and I haven't noticed any other issues.

Caligirl--sorry you aren't having luck with it though! They are all one size...but some women have different shapes internally...so perhaps that is the problem. You sure you have inserted it correctly? You need to insert it as far back as it will go. You might get used to it after a while...but it may just not be a 'fit' for you. I would first make sure you are inserting it properly. If you want more detailed info :) just pm me. I might try and give it a little grace for a bit though--since it sounds like your cycle got messed up from the patch, and that might be part of the problem. I have read negative things on the patch...so maybe it will end up being a blessing? I had pretty good luck with the conventional pill (ortho) before nuvaring, so that's always an option too--but you would have to start thinking about it every day though.

tiffjake Enthusiast

My husband is in Iraq so now is the perfect time to get off of any birth control and try to have a normal cycle on my own, so that we can start trying for children when he gets home.

BUT- I got a Rx for the Ring first, and the Doc was SO RUDE!! I asked her how to use it and she said "there is an insert....." and I said "well, what if I have questions?" and she said "then you make another appointment"!!!!! Can you believe that! Needless to say, I will not be going back to her! And so I get home and open the insert to read it, and it says not to use if you have heart defects or a history of breast cancer in your family (and a long list of other things) and I have both of those, so I am not going to use it. I will also be sending the doctor a nasty note. That was when I decided to just go natural, but I know that not everyone can do that. I have heard great things about the ring from several people, so if you are looking for something, I would give it a try. But, personally, it is time for me to get my OWN cycle going, you know? I mean, I was on the pill for 7 years!!!!!!

About the patch-I am a pharmacy tech and there are a lot of concerns about the patch. Things are absorbed through the skin totally differently than they are through the stomach and digestive system. This system is not perfect and has shown bad health consequeces. I, personally, was interested in the patch a few months ago, but I am not willing to take the health risks.

jenvan Collaborator

Tiffany--

I did read thru the nuvaring risks and they seemed to be the same as the risks with my ortho. I think those risks you mentioned are similar for all BC, so beware of that. I totally understand your decision to opt out. I would love to do that myself too--but at this point I physically can not risk a pregnancy. I have been on BC for about 10 or 11 years...forever! I have ovarian cysts.... I think when I have kids, we will have them close together, then the dh will get the "snip, snip" and we'll call it quits with the BC for good! :)

Susan123 Rookie

I didn't agree with Nuvaring and if you ever take it out watch out you might spend the day in bed with a god awful migraine. I had to leave work it was so bad and sleep a minimum of 4 hours before I felt better. Also, I noticed an increase in dischargea and irritation after 3 weeks on. They say the patch isn't much better and they some doctors have stopped recommending it after some recent findings. Not sure what. I am back on the pill.

Kailynsmom Apprentice

I have been on the patch for almost 6 months and like it. Unlike the pill, I ahven't gained weight, actualy I've lost a few lbs, it's lessened my pms symptoms like irritability. However, I do get awful diahhrea before each period , which i never did on pill or without any bc. My only gripe is that I can't find a spot on me that clothes don't rub against the side of patch and cause it to pull away from skin. ANyone else had this problem?

Canadian Karen Community Regular
I think when I have kids, we will have them close together, then the dh will get the "snip, snip" and we'll call it quits with the BC for good! :)

I hope you have better luck with having hubby go for the "snip" than I did! Shortly after we were married, Terry got really bad kidney stones. He was in the hospital for two weeks, they were giving him meds and, believe it or not, BEER!, every day trying to get rid of them. They wouldn't budge, so they had to "go in" and crush them with a claw. (I can visualize all the men reading this shivering and cringing right now.... :lol::P ). This was the days before laser treatment! Ever since then, his philosophy is NOBODY GOES NEAR IT!!! (except me, of course..... ;) )

So after the boys were born, I had to go in to get sliced and diced! We couldn't take any chances, another pregnancy might have resulted in triplets!!!! :o

Hugs

Karen

CaliGirl Newbie

Hi, everyone. I have an update on my little birth control crisis. I felt terrible on the nuva-ring--it was like I was always having cramps, which I guess is unusual. It kept on moving, so I thought, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em! I gave up after 6 days and took it out entirely. I made an appointment with my gyno, and I guess it was just a screw-up at CVS, so she wrote me another prescription. She said she felt completely comfortable prescribing it, because I don't smoke, not everweight, no risks for excessive blood clots, etc. She also said that every BC on the market has much less estrogen than the older BC pills from the 1950's. It makes me wonder how much of this is truly safety related, and how much of this is liability protection.

So anyway, I got my patch back, and I'm happy. :)

Thanks for the advice, everyone.

Rachel

PS Kailynsmom--I usually put it somewhere on my back, and it's much more comfortable. I've found the key is to stick it to skin that doesn't have to move or flex very much.

tiffjake Enthusiast
Tiffany--

I did read thru the nuvaring risks and they seemed to be the same as the risks with my ortho. I think those risks you mentioned are similar for all BC, so beware of that. I totally understand your decision to opt out. I would love to do that myself too--but at this point I physically can not risk a pregnancy. I have been on BC for about 10 or 11 years...forever! I have ovarian cysts.... I think when I have kids, we will have them close together, then the dh will get the "snip, snip" and we'll call it quits with the BC for good! :)

Jen,

I totally understand. I am only able to do this now because my husband is overseas so I am not worried about getting preggers for another year, and after that we want to start trying. I too have cysts, and I was told that I would have to be on BC's for life to help with the pain, but I wanna try and see on my own, because I was on the pill when they told me that, so I am not just going to take their word for it....we all know (especially in this message board!) that docs can be wrong! LOL. My problem with the ring is that it is BRAND NEW and the pill has been around for 30+ years. The manufacturers list the same side effects because the main ingredients are the same, but that dosent mean that they will act the same when delivered differently to the body. Just like wheat eaten and wheat in lotion. Different reactions. Lotion does not enter the digestive tract.

Ortho (I am assuming you are refering to ortho try-cyclen, ortho cyclen, or ortho-novum 7/7/7) is a "second-generation" oral contraceptive. And Ortho try-cyclen contains the progestin norgestimate which is rapildy converted in the body to norgesterel. These are "proven" or tested technologies. In the 60's and 70's it was not uncommon for women to have major heart attacks and strokes because of the potent pills available. Things have been adjusted in the second generation of BC's. There is a really great book that I use for work called "Worst Pills, Best Pills; A consumers guide to avoiding drug-induced death or illness". It is really neat to see all of the info out there about the 200 most prescribed pills. It is a really big book, but I like having it around to check on side effects and interactions. Just a little info for you.

jenvan Collaborator

Tiffany-

Thanks for the info! I may ck that book out... Keep me updated on you--on any cysts etc after going off b/c. Hope things work out--and that your husband comes home soon!

Jnkmnky Collaborator

Why are condoms so not discussed here? There would be no discussion of the man's body reacting badly to a condom. Only the man, himself, not being thrilled. If you use bc for a medical condition, that's one thing, but to prevent pregnancy? You're screwing with your body. Why are so many women willing to alter their hormones to avoid pregnancy? Take a step back and think about the absurdity of it for a moment.

jenvan Collaborator

I do take it also for medical reasons, the cysts... I actually abhor condoms too, so it wouldn't be just my husband complaining. He is anti-meds, so I'm sure if I brought it up seriously and said I wanted to go off bc, he would support me. He has also volunteered to get the "snip snip" when we decide the time is right... I know not all ladies have a husband who would do that.

Jnkmnky Collaborator
I do take it also for medical reasons, the cysts... I actually abhor condoms too, so it wouldn't be just my husband complaining. He is anti-meds, so I'm sure if I brought it up seriously and said I wanted to go off bc, he would support me. He has also volunteered to get the "snip snip" when we decide the time is right... I know not all ladies have a husband who would do that.

I recall you saying earlier that YOU take it for med reasons. It just boggles my mind how many women take bcpills, etc. I can't leave a discussion on bcp without pointing out the insanity of taking them in the first place.... for bc, not med conditions. Our culture accepts them too freely. Where's the cry to rid them from our women? Bc has been "normalized" by a very crafty industry. We can easily point out abuses suffered by women in third world countries and those countries that reject women's rights, but we fail to see how an entire concept of "birth control" is dominated with the hormonal wreakage of a female body.

hlm34 Apprentice
I recall you saying earlier that YOU take it for med reasons. It just boggles my mind how many women take bcpills, etc. I can't leave a discussion on bcp without pointing out the insanity of taking them in the first place.... for bc, not med conditions. Our culture accepts them too freely. Where's the cry to rid them from our women? Bc has been "normalized" by a very crafty industry. We can easily point out abuses suffered by women in third world countries and those countries that reject women's rights, but we fail to see how an entire concept of "birth control" is dominated with the hormonal wreakage of a female body.

You are right. I DO fail to see how an "entire concept of birth control is dominated with the hormonal wreakage of the female body". I really don't think it is that at all.

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest cassidy

I've been on the ring for 1 1/2 years now. I love it. I hated the patch because it leaves a sticky bandaid type residue where you put it. Neither my husband or I can feel the ring at all and it has been great. I just took my last one out the other day - we are going to start trying to get pregnant in a few months and I want to have some non-birth control periods. I've never had a regular period in my life, but I'm hoping my new gluten-free diet may help with that (I saw that as a symptom somewhere).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,911
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deborah anne
    Newest Member
    Deborah anne
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jack Common
      My old results (almost a year ago) are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months and after I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   I didn't have any symptoms now except tiredness but I think it's just work. I'm not IgA deficient as you can see so I don't need to do this Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG test. But I do because it's sometimes not in the normal range. What do you think this time? I think I don't have celiac disease. But this test... 
    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
    • knitty kitty
      Wow, @plumbago, Curiouser, and curioser... Have you been fasting?  Apparently HDL levels increase after fasting... https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)31185-7/abstract   I must say it, try taking some Thiamine.  Thiamine helps regulate lipoproteins... Thiamine helped lower HDL in this study whether they had diabetes or not. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921172/#:~:text=Serum thiamine and its derivatives,supplementation (p %3D 0.009).
×
×
  • Create New...