Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Don't Revive Ancient Threads!


lovegrov

Recommended Posts

lovegrov Collaborator

Hi, folks. I'm posting this strictly as my own opinion.

Recently we've seen several threads that were more than six years old revived because somebody had a thought to add to them. New thoughts on any topic are always welcome, but when you revive a a thread from 2004, you're often reviving very old and inaccurate information, particularly since that was before the allergen labeling law. I realize that some of the folks who have done this are new to the board, but I thought I'd post this request anyway. Before you add to a topic, check its age. If it's really, really old, consider starting a new thread to air your thoughts.

thanks

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Food for Life



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
GliadinX


Lunabell Apprentice

Is there a way for mods to close the old threads, but still leave them up for reference? It might solve the problem. I have a small mom's forum and we sometimes do that, though it is usually spammer dredging up old threads for us.

psawyer Proficient

The moderators have the capability to lock any topic at any time. However, it is not our policy to do so except in very rare circumstances. There are less than ten locked topics on the entire board.

modiddly16 Enthusiast

THANK YOU! For posting this!!! It's such a pain when threads come up and the date is 2006 or 2008 and people are still commenting. Things change so quickly and I'd hate for anyone to get wrong information because the assumption is made that its up to date information. I don't know that I'd want anything to be deleted because its nice to search back and see what was discussed but I'm sure something old from 2006 doesn't apply to anything in todays' celiac standards!

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

The problem is that it's usually someone who is not a regular member here doing a google search that finds an old post here and revives it. Then a few people on the board see it and comment without realizing it's old. It would be better to just comment on it that "this post was started in 200X..." to let people know it's old and the info may have changed. I try to do that when I see one. To be honest though I don't mind the old posts. They are not always full of outdated info. Product info and restaurant menus may change but people's experiences/responses to the diet don't change. Sometimes they are about things I've wondered about myself and I learn something new from them. ;)

Lisa Mentor

If a last post is four years old, it might make sense to lock it. It still can be view.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,937
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ladyliv
    Newest Member
    Ladyliv
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Authentic Foods


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Daura Damm



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I would ask for a total IGA test (aka, Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and other names as well) to check for IGA deficiency. That test should always be ordered along with the TTG IGA. If someone is IGA deficient, their individual celiac IGA test scores will be artificially low which can result in false negatives. Make sure you are eating generous amounts of gluten leading up to any testing or diagnostic procedure for celiac disease to ensure validity of the results. 10g of gluten daily for a period of at least 2 weeks is what current guidelines are recommending. That's the amount of gluten found in about 4-6 slices of wheat bread.
    • jlp1999
      There was not a total IGA test done, those were the only two ordered. I would say I was consuming a normal amount of gluten, I am not a huge bread or baked goods eater
    • trents
      Were you consuming generous amounts of gluten in the weeks leading up to the blood draw for the antibody testing? And was there a Total IGA test done to test for IGA deficiency?
    • jlp1999
      Thank you for the reply. It was the TTG IGA that was within normal limits
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @jlp1999! Which IGA test do you refer to as being normal? TTG-IGA? Total IGA? DGP-IGA? Yes, any positive on an IGA or an IGG test can be due to something other than celiac disease and this is especially true of weak positives. Villous atrophy can also be cause by other things besides celiac disease such as some medications, parasitic infections and even some foods (especially dairy from an intolerance to the dairy protein casein). But the likelihood of that being the case is much less than it being caused by celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...