Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lily Of The Desert Products Are Tested For Gluten Content And Can Be Considered "gluten-Free".


Glen Gillis PhD

Recommended Posts

Glen Gillis PhD Newbie

To the Administrators:

On Nov. 16, 2010, a post was made stating; Lily of the Desert Herbal Stomach Formula Not Gluten-Free.

As Vice President of Research and Chief Science Officer of Lily of the Desert Organic Aloeceuticals, we hereby request to the administrators the opportunity to rebut these statements. We understand that this site is not one that companies should be promoting their products; this is not our intent. But the comments made were derogatory and unfounded. In this we feel the right to speak to the topic and we hope those who read this forum will allow us to provide information as to our product safety. If allowed to comment, please post the following statements;

On Nov. 16, 2010, a post was made stating; Lily of the Desert Herbal Stomach Formula Not Gluten-Free.

As Vice President of Research and Chief Science Officer of Lily of the Desert Organic Aloeceuticals, we hereby request the opportunity to rebut these statements. We understand that this site is not one that companies should be promoting their products; this is not our intent. But the comments made were derogatory and unfounded. In this we feel the right to speak to the topic and we hope those who read this forum will allow us to provide information as to our product safety.

In review of the comments made, it is clear that this is a distraught individual who suffers from a terrible disease. But this individual also made an inappropriate rush to judgment. He has initiated verbal attacks on employees of Lily of the Desert, the company as a whole and what may be considered slander of Lily of the Desert over internet blogs such as Celiac.com. His comments are based on translation of the correspondence, not scientific fact or data.

We present the following scientific fact that can be labeled as public domain as well as both internal and independent test data in response to the accusations:

1. It is public domain that gluten-free products, as defined by the FDA, refers to products containing less than a quantity of 20 ppm (parts per million). The Celiac Association uses a much more aggressive approach by setting standards even lower (10 ppm) although this is not an officially accepted number. We at Lily of the Desert do accept this standard.

2. It is public domain that gluten is defined as a protein that exists in certain grain feedstock and as an additive in many processed foods. Major sources of gluten include wheat, barley and rye. Oat, the feedstock found in the Herbal Stomach Formula, does contain prolamin, a gluten-like substance. But the quantity of gluten present in this plant is considered extremely minor in comparison to other


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,112
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MissSmurf
    Newest Member
    MissSmurf
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...